Analytical Predictions of the Air Gap Response of Floating Structures

Lance Manuel; Bert Sweetman; Steven R. Winterstein

doi:10.1115/1.1372195

Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering | Volume 123 | Issue 3 | TECHNICAL PAPERS

< Previous Article Next Article >

TECHNICAL PAPERS

Analytical Predictions of the Air Gap Response of Floating Structures

Lance Manuel, Bert Sweetman and Steven R. Winterstein

[+] Author and Article Information

Lance Manuel

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712e-mail: lmanuel@mail.utexas.edu

Bert Sweetman, Steven R. Winterstein

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 123(3), 112-117 (Feb 16, 2001) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1372195 History: Received March 01, 2000; Revised February 16, 2001

Article

References

Figures

Tables

Citing Articles

Purchase this Content

$25.00

Purchase

Learn about subscription and purchase options

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Definition of the instantaneous air gap, a(t), in terms of the net wave elevation and the net vertical displacement

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Plan view showing four columns of the Troll semi-submersible and the three field points (Nos. 1, 5, and 6) studied

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Veslefrikk air gap response (peak factor in 3 h)—measurements versus analytical predictions at nine different field points for two seastates; H_s=12 and 14 m

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Web of Science® Times Cited: 8

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

PDF
Email

You must be logged in as an individual user to share content.

Return to: Analytical Predictions of the Air Gap Response of Floating Structures

Copyright in the material you requested is held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Privacy Policy for further information.
Share
Get Citation

Manuel L, Sweetman B, Winterstein SR. Analytical Predictions of the Air Gap Response of Floating Structures. ASME. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2001;123(3):112-117. doi:10.1115/1.1372195.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

© Copyright
Get Alerts

Processing your request... Please Wait.

Analytical Predictions of the Air Gap Response of Floating Structures

References

Figures

Definition of the instantaneous air gap, a(t), in terms of the net wave elevation and the net vertical displacement

Plan view showing four columns of the Troll semi-submersible and the three field points (Nos. 1, 5, and 6) studied

Veslefrikk air gap response (peak factor in 3 h)—measurements versus analytical predictions at nine different field points for two seastates; H_s=12 and 14 m

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Analytical Predictions of the Air Gap Response of Floating Structures

References

Figures

Definition of the instantaneous air gap, a(t), in terms of the net wave elevation and the net vertical displacement

Plan view showing four columns of the Troll semi-submersible and the three field points (Nos. 1, 5, and 6) studied

Veslefrikk air gap response (peak factor in 3 h)—measurements versus analytical predictions at nine different field points for two seastates; Hs=12 and 14 m

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Veslefrikk air gap response (peak factor in 3 h)—measurements versus analytical predictions at nine different field points for two seastates; H_s=12 and 14 m