0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Temporal Variability in Corrosion Modeling and Reliability Updating

[+] Author and Article Information
Daniel Straub

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710straub@ce.berkeley.edu

Michael Havbro Faber

 Institute of Structural Engineering (IBK), ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerlandfaber@ibk.baug.ethz.ch

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 129(4), 265-272 (May 26, 2006) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2355517 History: Received July 21, 2005; Revised May 26, 2006

Many parameters influencing corrosion degradation are time variant and the corrosion process is thus subject to temporal variability, the real characteristics of which are commonly neglected in reliability assessment. After a short overview on the quantitative modeling of corrosion loss, a comparison is made between different temporal models of corrosion degradation and the consequences of applying an inappropriate model are investigated. The effect of temporal variability is then investigated in detail and illustrated in an example considering CO2 corrosion in pipelines. It is demonstrated how the time-variant corrosion process can be consistently represented by time-invariant random variables, using equivalent values of the corrosion rate. Finally, the influence of temporal variability on reliability updating following inspections is investigated and it is shown how this effect can be accounted for in inspection planning.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

One realization of the two random processes and the consequent corrosion rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

The distribution of re(t=5year)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

The standard deviation of the equivalent corrosion rate σre as a function of νt

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Correlation of the equivalent corrosion rate in the period before the inspection and the total time period t

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Common quantitative temporal corrosion models

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Comparing two corrosion models. The shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Reliability index obtained with the two corrosion models, with and without inspection

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In