Controlled Weld Toe Profiles for Fatigue Life Extension of T-Butt Joints: An Application to FSOs & FPSOs

[+] Author and Article Information
J. Efraín Rodríguez-Sánchez, Alejandro Rodríguez-Castellanos, Efrén Ayala-Uraga

 Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Eje Central Lazaro Cardenas Norte 152, San Bartolo Atepehuacan, 07730 Mexico D. F., Mexico

Manuel F. Carbajal-Romero

 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Seccion de Estudios de Posgrado, ESIME Azcapotzalco, Avenida de las Granjas 682, 02550 Mexico D. F., Mexico

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 131(1), 011401 (Nov 10, 2008) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2948947 History: Received April 25, 2007; Revised March 10, 2008; Published November 10, 2008

Application of controlled weld toe profiles can be considered an option to extend the fatigue life of welded connections when ongoing tankers are converted in dry docks to serve like offshore ships (FPSOs and FSOs). Very slim chances to implement such fatigue improvement will arise when these vessels are in service, since a converted ship is designed to be inspected, maintained, and repaired in situ and not in dry dock as it is uneconomical to interrupt production. Codes recognize fatigue life extension by means of a controlled weld toe profile (2004, NORSOK Standard N-004 Rev. 2 October). Application of a controlled weld toe profile during conversion in selected areas previously identified by stress analysis of the hull structure can lead to extend the converted vessel fatigue life to comply with an expected field life. The American Bureau of Shipping S-N curves allow a credit of 2.2 on fatigue life when suitable toe grinding and NDE are provided. A controlled weld toe profile can be applied during dry dock ship conversion to FSO or FPSO to welds in a noncracked condition but that were identified prone to fatigue cracking in a stress assessment analysis under new service conditions. Credit on fatigue life in various codes and results from experimental data obtained from fatigue tested specimens with a controlled weld toe profile are given. Comments on the design of a controlled weld toe profiles and recommendations based on experimental experience for the implementation of equipment to perform a controlled weld toe profile are also given. A fracture mechanics approach for the assessment of controlled weld toe profiles for fatigue life extension purposes is described. Initially, a comparison of stress concentration factors for a typical T-butt ship hull plate connection with and without weld toe profile control determined by finite element analysis (FEA) is presented. Results obtained from the FEA connection such as through plate stress distribution are used in a fracture mechanics analysis to compare the fatigue crack growth curve in as-welded condition to that with controlled weld toe profile. It is demonstrated that weld toe profile control is a feasible method to be implemented to improve fatigue life in the order of 2 of T-butt welded connections of ships, which are under conversion to serve as FPSOs or FSOs. This fatigue life extension factor should not be considered at the design stage.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Grinding on welds according to NORSOK (1)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Disk cutters for machining crack repair profiles and weld toes, R in mm (4)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Edge U-shaped repair profile and parameters (7)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

SCFs for edge repaired T-butts under tension

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

SCFs for edge repaired T-butts under bending

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

SCFs for edge U-shaped repair profiles on T-butts under tension (T=30mm)(7)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

SCFs for edge U-shaped repair profiles on T-butts under bending (T=30mm)(7)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Stress distribution through the thickness for a T-butt plate under bending

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Weld geometry correction factor Yg for a T-butt

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Fatigue crack growth during initiation in a T-butt (TSC ACPD array used for crack monitoring)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Fatigue crack growth for as-welded and controlled weld toe profile R4D1 in a T-butt

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Experimental fatigue crack growth in a butt specimen in as-welded condition (first curve), and crack growth for the same specimen after the surface crack at the weld toe was repaired by machining a short repair and controlled weld toe profiles were machined at both sides of the repair (second curve)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In