Research Papers: Ocean Engineering

Three-Dimensional Fluid-Structure-Sediment Interaction Modeling With Application to Local Scouring Around a Movable Cylinder

[+] Author and Article Information
Tomoaki Nakamura

Designated Associate Professor
Institute for Advanced Research,
Nagoya University,
Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku,
Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
e-mail: tnakamura@nagoya-u.jp

Solomon C. Yim

Fellow ASME
School of Civil and Construction Engineering,
Oregon State University,
220 Owen Hall Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: solomon.yim@oregonstate.edu

Norimi Mizutani

Department of Civil Engineering,
Nagoya University,
Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku,
Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
e-mail: mizutani@civil.nagoya-u.ac.jp

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 10, 2011; final manuscript received December 5, 2012; published online May 24, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Dong S. Jeng.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 135(3), 031105 (May 24, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: OMAE-11-1078; doi: 10.1115/1.4023797 History: Received September 10, 2011; Revised December 05, 2012

Complex multidisciplinary physical fields formed by the dynamic interaction between fluid flows, structure motion, and seabed profile evolution are natural in a marine environment. Modeling and analysis of such fluid-structure-sediment interactions are essential for predicting and analyzing the nonlinear behavior of movable structures and their surrounding sediments under wave action. However, no analytical and numerical tools which consider the detailed physics of the entire coupled fluid-structure-sediment system are currently available. In this study, a three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure-sediment interaction model is developed to provide an overarching computational framework for simulating the dynamic behavior of multidisciplinary physical systems. The model consists of an extended Navier-Stokes solver that computes incompressible viscous multiphase flow, a volume-of-fluid module that tracks air-water interface motion, an immersed boundary module that tracks structure motion, and a sediment transport module that tracks suspended sediment motion and seabed profile evolution. For validation, the model is applied to hydraulic experiments on local scouring around a movable short cylinder supported at the base. It is found that the model predicts scour patterns around the cylinder reasonably well, consistent with experimental results measured in the hydraulic experiments. In addition, the computational applicability of the model is demonstrated to predict and analyze a general complex fluid-structure-sediment interaction phenomenon in the marine environment.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lee, K.-H., and Mizutani, N., 2009, “A Numerical Wave Tank Using Direct-Forcing Immersed Boundary Method and Its Application to Wave Force on a Horizontal Cylinder,” Coastal Eng. J., 51(1), pp. 27–48. [CrossRef]
Liu, X., and García, M. H., 2008, “Three-Dimensional Numerical Model With Free Water Surface and Mesh Deformation for Local Sediment Scour,” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 134(4), pp. 203–217. [CrossRef]
Nakamura, T., and Yim, S. C., 2011, “A Nonlinear Three-Dimensional Coupled Fluid-Sediment Interaction Model for Large Seabed Deformation,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 133(3), p. 031103. [CrossRef]
Voropayev, S. I., Testik, F. Y., Fernando, H. J. S., and Boyer, D. L., 2003, “Burial and Scour Around Short Cylinder Under Progressive Shoaling Waves,” Ocean Eng., 30, pp. 1647–1667. [CrossRef]
Catano-Lopera, Y. A., Demir, S. T., and Garcia, M. H., 2007, “Self-Burial of Short Cylinders Under Oscillatory Flows and Combined Waves Plus Currents,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 32(1), pp. 191–203. [CrossRef]
Gilbert, R. W., Zedler, E. A., Grilli, S. T., and Street, R. L., 2007, “Progress on Nonlinear-Wave-Forced Sediment Transport Simulation,” IEEE J. Ocean, Eng., 32(1), pp. 236–248. [CrossRef]
Hatton, K. A., Foster, D. L., Traykovski, P., and Smith, H. D., 2007, “Numerical Simulations of the Flow and Sediment Transport Regimes Surrounding a Short Cylinder,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 32(1), pp. 249–259. [CrossRef]
Kunugi, T., 2000, “MARS for Multiphase Calculation,” Comp. Fluid Dyn. J., 9(1), p. IX–563.
Kajishima, T., Takiguchi, S., Hamasaki, H., and Miyake, Y., 2001, “Turbulence Structure of Particle-Laden Flow in a Vertical Plane Channel Due to Vortex Shedding,” JSME Int. J. Ser. B, 44(4), pp. 526–535. [CrossRef]
Roulund, A., Sumer, B. M., Fredsøe, J., and Michelsen, J., 2005, “Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Flow and Scour Around a Circular Pile,” J. Fluid Mech., 534, pp. 351–401. [CrossRef]
Nakamura, T., Mizutani, N., and Fujima, K., 2010, “Three-Dimensional Numerical Analysis on Deformation of Run-Up Tsunami and Tsunami Force Acting on Square Structures,” Proc. 32nd Int. Conf. on Coastal Eng., ASCE, Vol. 32, currents, 14, 10 p.
Brackbill, J. U., Kothe, D. B., and Zemach, C., 1992, “A Continuum Method for Modeling Surface Tension,” J. Comp. Phys., 100, pp. 335–354. [CrossRef]
Mizutani, N., McDougal, W. G., and Mostafa, A. M., 1996, “BEM-FEM Combined Analysis of Nonlinear Interaction Between Wave and Submerged Breakwater,” Proc. 25th Int. Conf. on Coastal Eng., ASCE, pp. 2377–2390.
Salvetti, M. V., and Banerjee, S., 1995, “A Priori Tests of a New Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Model for Finite Difference Large-Eddy Simulations,” Phys. Fluids, 7(11), pp. 2831–2847. [CrossRef]
Coastal Development Institute of Technology (CDIT), 2001, “Research and Development of Numerical Wave Flume (Super Roller Flume for Computer Aided Design of Maritime Structure),” 296 p. (in Japanese).
Hinatsu, M., 1992, “Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Viscous Nonlinear Waves Using Moving Grid System Fitted on a Free Surface,” J. Kansai Soc. Naval Arch., 217, pp. 1–11. Available at http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003871898/en/
Cruz, E., Yokoki, H., Isobe, M., and Watanabe, A., 1993, “Nonreflecting Boundary Condition for Nonlinear Wave Equation,” Proc. Coastal Eng., 40, pp. 46–50 (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W. H., 1991, “A Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Eddy Viscosity Model,” Phys. Fluids A, 3(7), pp. 1760–1765. [CrossRef]
Engelund, F., and Fredsøe, J., 1976, “A Sediment Transport Model for Straight Alluvial Channels,” Nordic Hydrol., 7, pp. 293–306.
Brooks, H. N., 1963, “Discussion on “Boundary Shear Stresses in Curved Trapezoidal Channels,” by A. T. Ippen and P. A. Drinker,” J. Hydraulic Div., 89(3), pp. 327–333. Available at http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?258785
Nielsen, P., Svendsen, I. A., and Staub, C., 1978, “Onshore-Offshore Sediment Movement on a Beach,” Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Coastal Eng., ASCE, pp. 1475–1492.
Nielsen, P., 1992, “Coastal Bottom Boundary Layers and Sediment Transport,” Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering, World Scientific, Singapore, Vol. 5, 340 pp.
Testik, F. Y., Voropayev, S. I., and Fernando, H. J. S., 2005, “Flow Around a Short Horizontal Bottom Cylinder Under Steady and Oscillatory Flows,” Phys. Fluids, 17, 11 p. 031103.
Jeong, J., and Hussain, F., 1995, “On the Identification of a Vortex,” J. Fluid Mech., 285, pp. 69–94. [CrossRef]
Miura, H., and Kida, S., 1998, “Identification and Visualization of Low-Pressure Vortices In Turbulence,” Nagare Multimedia, JSFM, http://www2.nagare.or.jp/mm/98/miura/index.htm (in Japanese).


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Typical computational domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Artificial damping zone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Coupling procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Computational domain for local scouring around a movable short cylinder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Final scour depth zsf after 50 wave periods: (a) H = 0.05 m, T = 1.5 s, d50 = 0.20 mm, and (b) H = 0.03 m, T = 3.0 s, d50 = 0.12 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Snapshots of wave deformation around the cylinder [H = 0.05 m, T = 1.5 s, d50 = 0.20 mm, the same case as in Fig. 5(a)]: (a) during run-up, and (b) during drawdown

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Snapshots of wave deformation and vortex structures (λ2 = –10) around the cylinder for large scour evolution (H = 0.05 m, T = 1.5 s, d50 = 0.10 mm): (a) t/T = 14.0, (b) t/T = 17.0, (c) t/T = 28.0, (d) t/T = 29.0, (e) t/T = 30.0, and (f) t/T = 32.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Position and angle of the cylinder for large scour evolution (H = 0.05 m, T = 1.5 s, d50 = 0.10 mm, the same case as in Fig. 7)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Position and angle of the cylinder dropped from above the still water surface (H = 0.05 m, T = 1.5 s, d50 = 0.20 mm, the same case as in Fig. 9)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Snapshots of the behavior of the cylinder during the airdrop, impact on the water surface, sinkage, and impact on the seabed surface and the resulting response of the surrounding seabed (H = 0.05 m, T = 1.5 s, d50 = 0.20 mm): (a) t/T = 0.05, (b) t/T = 0.11, (c) t/T = 0.15, (d) t/T = 0.20, (e) t/T = 0.40, and (f) t/T = 10.0




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In