0
Research Papers: Ocean Engineering

Response Based Identification of Critical Wave Scenarios

[+] Author and Article Information
Marco Klein

e-mail: klein@naoe.tu-berlin.de
Ocean Engineering Division,
Technical University Berlin,
Berlin 10623, Germany

Nuno Fonseca

Centre for Marine Technology and Engineering,
Technical University of Lisbon,
Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received July 16, 2012; final manuscript received April 10, 2013; published online June 6, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Wei Qiu.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 135(3), 031107 (Jun 06, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-12-1069; doi: 10.1115/1.4024269 History: Received July 16, 2012; Revised April 10, 2013

In the past few years the identification and investigation of critical wave sequences in terms of offshore structure responses became one of the main topics in the ocean engineering community. Thereby the area of interest covers the entire field of application spectra at sea—from efficient and economic offshore operations in moderate sea states to reliability as well as survival in extreme wave conditions. For most cases, the focus lies on limiting criteria for the design, such as maximum global loads, maximum relative motions between two or more vessels, or maximum accelerations, at which the floating structure has to operate or to survive. These criteria are typically combined with a limiting characteristic sea state (Hs, Tp) or a rogue wave. For the investigation of offshore structures as well as the identification of critical wave sequences, different approaches are available—most of them are based on linear transfer functions as it is an efficient procedure for the fast holistic evaluation. But, for some cases the linear method approach implies uncertainties due to nonlinear response behavior, in particular in extreme wave conditions. This paper presents an approach to these challenges, a response based optimization tool for critical wave sequence detection. This tool, which has been successfully introduced for the evaluation of the applicability of a multibody system based on the linear method approach, is adjusted to a nonlinear task—the vertical bending moment of a chemical tanker in extreme wave conditions. Therefore a nonlinear strip theory solver is introduced into the optimization routine to capture the nonlinear effects on the vertical bending moment due to steep waves. The goal of the procedure is to find a worst case wave sequence for a certain critical sea state. This includes intensive numerical investigation as well as model test validation.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Topics: Waves , Optimization , Ships , Stress
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Clauss, G., Lehmann, E., and Östergaard, C., 1992, Offshore Structures, Vol. 1: Conceptual Design and Hydrodynamics, Springer, London.
Jacobsen, K., and Clauss, G. F., 2006, “Time-Domain Simulations of Multi-Body Systems in Deterministic Wave Trains,” OMAE 2006-25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2006-92348.
Clauss, G. F., Schmittner, C. E., Hennig, J., Guedes Soares, C., Fonseca, N., and Pascoal, R., 2004, “Bending Moments of an FPSO in Rogue Waves,” OMAE 2004-23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2004-51504.
Clauss, G., and Birk, L., 1996, “Hydrodynamic Shape Optimization of Large Offshore Structures,” Appl. Ocean Res., 18(4), pp. 157–171. [CrossRef]
Clauss, G., Klein, M., Sprenger, F., and Testa, D., 2010, “Evaluation of Critical Conditions in Offshore Vessel Operation by Response Based Optimization Procedures,” OMAE 2010-29th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, OMAE2010-21071.
Clauss, G., Hennig, J., and Cramer, H., 2002, “Evaluation of Capsizing Risk by Deterministic Analysis of Extreme Roll Motions,” ITTC 2002-23rd International Towing Tank Conference.
Fonseca, N., and Guedes Soares, C., 2002, “Comparison of Numerical and Experimental Results of Nonlinear Wave-Induced Vertical Ship Motions and Loads,” J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 6, pp. 139–204. [CrossRef]
Rajendran, S., Fonseca, N., Guedes Soares, C., Clauss, G., and Klein, M., 2011, “Time Domain Comparison With Experiments for Ship Motions and Structural Loads on a Container Ship in Abnormal Waves,” OMAE 2011-30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2011-50316.
Clauss, G. F., Klein, M., and Dudek, M., 2010. “Influence of the Bow Shape on Loads in High and Steep Waves,” OMAE 2010-29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2009-20142.
Torhaug, R., Winterstein, S., and Braathen, A., 1998, “Nonlinear Ship Loads: Stochastic Models for Extreme Response,” J. Ship Res., 42(1), pp. 46–55.
Pastoor, L. W., 2002, “On the Assessment of Nonlinear Ship Motions and Loads,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Adegeest, L., Braathen, A., and Vada, T., 2000, “Evaluation of Methods for Estimation of Extreme Nonlinear Ship Responses Based on Numerical Simulations and Model Tests,” Twenty-Second Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, pp. 84–99.
Drummen, I., Wu, M., and Moan, T., 2009, “Numerical and Experimental Investigations Into the Application of Response Conditioned Waves for Long-Term Nonlinear Analyses,” Mar. Struct., 22, pp. 576–593. [CrossRef]
Alford, L. K., 2008, “Estimating Extreme Responses Using a Non-Uniform Phase Distribution,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rowan, T., 1990, “Functional Stability Analysis of Numerical Algorithms,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
GL, 2009, “Germanischer Lloyd,” Rules & Guidelines.
Fonseca, N., and Guedes Soares, C., 1998, “Time-Domain Analysis of Large-Amplitude Vertical Motions and Wave Loads,” J. Ship Res., 42(2), pp. 100–113.
Fonseca, N., and Soares, C. G., 1998, “Nonlinear Wave Induced Responses of Ships in Irregular Seas,” Proceedings 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE98), New York.
Cummins, W., 1962, “The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions,” Schiffstechnik, 9(47), pp. 101–109.
Salvesen, N., Tuck, E., and Faltisen, O., 1970, “Ship Motions and Sea Loads,” Trans. SNAME 78.
St. Denis, S., and Pierson, W., 1953, “On the Motions of Ships in Confused Seas,” Trans. SNAME 61.
Buchner, B., 1995, “On the Impact of Green Water Loading on Ship and Offshore Unit Design,” PRADS95-6th Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Mobile Units.
Fonseca, N., Guedes Soares, C., and Pascoal, R., 2006, “Ship Structural Loads Induced by Abnormal Wave Conditions on a Containership,” J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 11, pp. 245–259. [CrossRef]
Fonseca, N., Pascoal, R., and Guedes Soares, C., 2008, “Global Structural Loads Induced by Abnormal Waves and Design Storms on a FPSO,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 130(2), p. 021005. [CrossRef]
Clauss, G. F., Dudek, M., and Klein, M., 2011, “Influence of Wave Group Characteristics on Loads in Severe Seas,” OMAE 2011-30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2011-49940.
Miche, A., 1944, “Mouvements Ondulatoires de la Mer en Profondeur Croissante ou Décroissante. Première Partie. Mouvements Ondulatoires Périodiques et Cylindriques en Profondeur Constante,” Ann. Ponts Chaussées, 114, pp. 42–78.
Toffoli, A., Babanin, A., Onorato, M., and Waseda, T., 2010, “Maximum Steepness of Oceanic Waves: Field and Laboratory Experiments,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 37(5), pp. 790–795. [CrossRef]
Clauss, G., and Kühnlein, W., 1996, “Nonlinear Transient Wave Excitation As a New Tool in Model Testing,” OMAE 96-552.
Clauss, G. F., and Schmittner, C. E., 2005, “Experimental Optimization of Extreme Wave Sequences for the Determinsitic Analysis of Wave/Structure Interaction,” OMAE 2005-24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2005-67049.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scheme of the response based optimization procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

JONSWAP energy density spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Progress of the objective function

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Results of the optimizations. The results are shifted in the time domain for a better comparability.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Results of random phase simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Model of the investigated chemical tanker

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the measured and calculated RAOs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Model test results versus results of the optimizations. The results are shifted in time domain for a better comparability.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Results of the optimizations with maximum wave steepness constraint. The results of the first optimization runs (runs 1–5, cf. Fig. 4) are indicated in light gray. The results are shifted in time domain for a better comparability.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In