0
Research Papers: Offshore Technology

Reliability-Based Factors of Safety for Vortex Induced Vibration Fatigue Using Field Measurements

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael Tognarelli, Pierre Beynet

BP America Production Company,
Houston, TX 77079

Emmanuel Fontaine, Hayden Marcollo

AMOG Consulting,
Melbourne, VIC 3167,
Notting Hill, Australia

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 5, 2011; final manuscript received September 17, 2011; published online July 15, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Antonio C. Fernandes.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 135(4), 041301 (Jul 15, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: OMAE-11-1026; doi: 10.1115/1.4023794 History: Received March 05, 2011; Revised September 17, 2011

The development of a vortex induced vibration (VIV) fatigue factor of safety (FoS) consistent with state-of-the-art industry design practice is cast within the coherent framework of reliability analysis. The proposed methodology consists of the following steps: (i) define the failure criteria or limit-state function (ii) setup a deterministic analysis model (iii) characterize the uncertainties involved in the problem (iv) propagate the uncertainties through the deterministic model and assess the probability of failure due to VIV fatigue and (v) calculate the FoS required to achieve a given failure probability. The proposed methodology is demonstrated by determining the FoS associated with using state-of-the-art VIV prediction models to attain varying reliability levels (probabilities of failure) in a hypothetical design scenario. Prediction uncertainty is based herein on measured flow and response data for several full-scale drilling risers working in the field. Results indicate that depending on the reliability level required of a particular design, different FoS than those that currently appear in guidance may be appropriate. Results also indicate the sensitivity of the FoS to the riser and prevailing current type, analysis program and input parameters, and accumulation of conservatism in aggregate versus single-event damage predictions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Marcollo, H., Vandiver, K., and Chaurasia, H., 2007, “Phenomena Observed in VIV Bare Riser Field Tests,” Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2007-29562.
Trim, A., Braaten, H., Lie, H., and Tognarelli, M., 2005, “Experimental Investigation of Vortex-Induced Vibration of Long Marine Risers,” J. Fluids Struct., 21(3), pp. 335–361. [CrossRef]
Tognarelli, M., Taggart, S., and Campbell, M., 2008, “Actual VIV Fatigue Response of Full Scale Drilling Risers: With and Without Suppression Devices,” Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore, Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2008-57046.
Tognarelli, M. A., Slocum, S. T., Frank, W. R., and Campbell, R. B., 2004, “VIV Response of a Long Flexible Cylinder in Uniform and Linearly Sheared Currents,” OTC 16338, Offshore Technical Conference.
Vandiver, J. K., Leverette, S., Wajnikonis, C. J., and Marcollo, H., 2007, User Guide for SHEAR7 Version 4.5, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Chaplin, J. R., Bearman, P. W., Cheng, Y., Fontaine, E., Graham, J. M. R., Herfjord, K., Huera Huarte, F. J., Isherwood, M., Lambrakos, K., Larsen, C. M., Meneghini, J. R., Moe, G., Pattenden, R. J., Triantafyllou, M. S., and Willden, R. H. J., 2005, “Blind Predictions of Laboratory Measurements of Vortex-Induced Vibrations of a Tension Riser,” J. Fluids Struct., 21(1), pp. 25–40. [CrossRef]
Bearman, P. W., Chaplin, J. R., Fontaine, E., Graham, J. M. R., Herfjord, K., Lima, A., Meneghini, J. R., Schulz, K. W., and Willden, R. H. J., 2006, “Comparison of CFD Predictions of Multi-Mode Vortex-Induced Vibrations of a Tension Riser with Laboratory Measurements,” Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on FSI, AE and FIV+N, ASME PVP Division Summer Meeting, ASME PVP2006-ICPVT11-93177.
Tognarelli, M. A., Yin, F., Campbell, M., and Achanta, V., 2009, “Benchmarking of SHEAR7v4.5: Comparisons to Full Scale Data and Legacy Analyses,” Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, ASME, OMAE2009-79443.
Chasparis, F., Modarres-Sadeghi, Y., Hover, F. S., Triantafyllou, M. S., Tognarelli, M. A., and Beynet, P. A., 2009, “Lock-in, Transient and Chaotic Response in Riser VIV,” Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore & Arctic Engineering, ASME, OMAE2009-79444.
Vandiver, K., Swithenbank, S., Jaiswal, V., and Marcollo, H., 2006, “The Effectiveness of Helical Strakes in the Suppression of High-Mode Number VIV,” Offshore Technical Conference, OTC 18276.
Winterstein, S. R., Jha, A. K., and Kumar, S., 1999, “Reliability of Floating Structures: Extreme Response and Load Factor Design,” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 125(4), pp. 163–169. [CrossRef]
Lemaire, M., and Pendola, M., 2006, “PHIMECA-SOFT,” Structural Safety, 28(1–2), pp. 130–149. [CrossRef]
Iranpour, M., and Taheri, F., 2006, “The State-Of-The-Art Review of Risers VIV Fatigue,” Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2006-92636.
Leira, B., Meling, T., Larsen, C. M., Berntsen, V., Stahl, B., and Trim, A., 2005, “Assessment of Fatigue Safety Factors for Deep-Water Risers in Relation to VIV,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Engineering, 127, pp. 353–358. [CrossRef]
Mork, K., Sodal, N., and Souza, L., 2001, “Present and Future Fatigue Analysis Procedure for Dynamic Risers,” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2001/OFT-1272.
Stahl, B., and Banon, H., 2002, “Fatigue Safety Factor for Deepwater Risers,” Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2002-28405.
Leira, B., Meling, T. S., Larsen, C., Berntsen, V., Stahl, B., and Trim, A., 2003, “Assessment of Fatigue Safety Factors for Deepwater Risers in Relation to VIV,” Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2003-37346.
Chezhian, M., Mork, K., Ronaess, M., Meling, T. S., 2005, “Application of DNV-RP-F204 for Determining Riser VIV Safety Factors,” Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2005-67021.
Sigurdsson, G., Mork, K., and Fyrileiv, O., 2006, “Calibration of Safety Factors for DNV-RP-F105 Free-Spanning Pipelines,” Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2006-92099.
Chezhian, M., Mork, K., Sodahl, N., Meling, T. S., and Leira, B., 2003, “Risk Based Fatigue Factor of Safety for Deepwater Risers,” 15th Deep Offshore Technology Conference DOT.
Tognarelli, M., Gabbai, R., and Campbell, M., 2009, “An Approach to Include Observed VIV Likelihood in Drilling Riser Fatigue Analyses,” Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore & Arctic Engineering, ASME OMAE2009-79443.
DetNorske Veritas, 2005, “Recommended Practice: Riser Fatigue,” DNV RP-F204. Available at: http://www.dnv.com
Melchers, R. E., 1987, Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Predicted versus measured damage rate for drilling risers subject to VIV (default analysis parameters, maximum damage along riser length)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Predicted versus measured damage rate for drilling risers subject to VIV (calibrated analysis parameters, maximum damage along riser length)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Safe and unsafe design scenarios for VIV fatigue

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Example fitting of the bias PDF (all risers included)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Design points (straight lines), observed bias frequency (bars), and fitted distribution for Riser 6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Fatigue damage prediction error comparison between SHEAR7v4.5 and VIVANA 3.7.7, maximum damage along riser length

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In