0
Research Papers: Offshore Technology

Penetration and Removal of the Mooring Dolphin Platform With Three Caisson Foundations

[+] Author and Article Information
Puyang Zhang

e-mail: zpy_td@163.com, zpy@tju.edu.cn

Hongyan Ding

Professor
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering
Simulation and Safety,
Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety,
Ministry of Education,
School of Civil Engineering,
Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China

Conghuan Le

Associate Professor
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering
Simulation and Safety,
School of Civil Engineering,
Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 26, 2012; final manuscript received July 8, 2013; published online September 4, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Dong S. Jeng.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 135(4), 041302 (Sep 04, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-12-1096; doi: 10.1115/1.4025145 History: Received September 26, 2012; Revised July 08, 2013

Mooring dolphin platforms (MDPs) with three caisson foundations were installed in the ice-drifting Bohai Sea of China. Before installation, prototype tests of penetration and removal processing were conducted near the design site. To determine the lateral soil pressure and skin friction of the caisson, soil pressure and strain gauge transducers were fixed along the external skirt of caisson B of MDP1. The shaft skin friction was calculated from the strain difference between any two points of the strain gauges. The transducer results indicated that when the soil property determined by unconsolidated and undrained (UU) triaxial tests was used to calculate the unit skin friction resistance, a value of the adhesion factor α of 1.5–2.0 is recommended. The factor α is 1–0.4 during the suction-assisted penetration phase. The lateral earth pressure coefficient K decreased with penetration depth, most likely due to seepage caused by underpressure. In addition, the difference between the measured values obtained from the soil pressure transducers represented the small tilt of MDP1 during the installation phase. The skin friction and lateral earth pressure significantly decreased in the removal phase, 12 h after the penetration phase, mainly due to the soil disturbance caused by suction penetration around the caisson.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Mooring dolphin platform with three bucket foundations (unit: millimeter) (a) Top view (b) Side view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Picture of MDP and other structures at Bohai Sea site

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Layout of transducers on bucket B of MDP1 (unit: millimeter) (a) Soil pressure transducers (b) Strain gauge for skin friction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Particle distribution curves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Cohesion and friction angle from UU test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Sensitivity and over consolidation ratio (OCR) of soils

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Summary of friction resistance during penetration/removal at test/located site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Soil pressure of SP1 during penetration processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Soil pressure of SP2 during penetration processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Soil pressure of SP3 during penetration processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Skin friction of SK1 during penetration processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Skin friction of SK2 during penetration processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Skin friction of SK3 during penetration processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Soil pressure of SP1 during removal processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Soil pressure of SP2 during removal processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Soil pressure of SP3 during removal processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Skin friction based on SK1-03 during removal processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Skin friction based on SK3-01/02 during removal processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Skin friction based on SK3-02 with a 6.1 m spacing during removal processing on testing site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Soil pressure of SP1 during penetration processing on located site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Soil pressure of SP2 during penetration processing on located site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Soil pressure of SP3 during penetration processing on located site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Skin friction based on SK1-01/03 during penetration processing on located site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Skin friction based on SK2-02/03 during penetration processing on located site (caisson B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Skin friction based on SK3-01/02 during penetration processing on located site (caisson B)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In