0
Research Papers: Ocean Engineering

Rigid-Body Water–Surface Impact Dynamics: Experiment and Semianalytical Approximation

[+] Author and Article Information
Ravi Challa

Graduate Research Assistant

Solomon C. Yim

Glenn Willis Holcomb Professor
School of Civil and Construction Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97330

C. P. Vendhan

Professor
Department of Ocean Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600036, India

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 25, 2010; final manuscript received October 5, 2013; published online November 12, 2013. Assoc. Editor: .

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 136(1), 011102 (Nov 12, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-10-1096; doi: 10.1115/1.4025653 History: Received September 25, 2010; Revised October 05, 2013

An experimental study of the dynamics of a generic rigid body during water impact and an equivalent-radius approximate analytical procedure is developed and calibrated in this study. The experimental tests in a wave basin covered a range of drop heights using a 1/6th-scale model of a practical water-landing object prototype for two drop mechanisms to determine the water impact and contact effects. The first mechanism involved a rope and pulley arrangement, while the second mechanism employed an electromagnetic release to drop the rigid body. Hydrodynamic parameters including peak acceleration and touchdown pressure were measured and the maximum impact/contact force was estimated for various entry speeds (corresponding to various drop heights) and weights of the rigid body. Results from the tests show that the impact acceleration and touchdown pressure increases approximately linearly with increasing drop height and the data provides conditions that keep impact accelerations under specified limits for the rigid-body prototype. The experimentally measured maximum accelerations were compared with classical von Karman and Wagner approximate closed-form solutions. In this study, an improved approximate solution procedure using an equivalent radius concept integrating experimental results with the von Karman and Wagner closed-form solutions is proposed and developed in detail. The resulting semianalytical estimates are calibrated against experimental results and found to provide close matching.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Von Karman, T., 1929, “The Impact of Seaplane Floats During Landing,” NACA TN 321, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC.
Baker, E., and Westine, S., 1967, “Model Tests for Structural Response of Apollo Command Module to Water Impact,” J. Spacecraft Rockets, 4(2), pp. 201–208. [CrossRef]
Kaplan, A., 1968, “Simplified Dynamic Analysis of Apollo Water Impact, Including Effects of the Flexible Heat Shield,” 11176-11176-6004-R0-00, TRW, Redondo Beach, CA.
Miloh, T., 1991, “On the Initial-Stage Slamming of a Rigid Sphere in a Vertical Water Entry,” Appl. Ocean Res., 13(1), pp. 43–48. [CrossRef]
Brooks, J. R., and Anderson, L. A., 1994, “Dynamics of a Space Module Impacting Water,” J. Spacecraft Rockets, 31(3), pp. 509–515. [CrossRef]
Zhao, R., Faltinsen, O. M., and Aarsnes, J. V., 1996, “Water Entry of Arbitrary Two-Dimensional Sections With and Without Flow Separation,” Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 408–423.
Faltinsen, O. M., 1990, Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Faltinsen, O. M., 1997, “The Effect of Hydroelasticity on Slamming,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Sect. A, 355, pp. 575–591. [CrossRef]
Faltinsen, O. M., 1999, “Water Entry of a Wedge by Hydroelastic Orthotropic Plate Theory,” J. Ship Res., 43(3), pp. 180–193.
Scolan, Y. M., and Korobkin, A. A., 2001, “Three-Dimensional Theory of Water Impact. Part 1. Inverse Wagner Problem,” J. Fluid Mech., 440, pp. 293–326. [CrossRef]
Korobkin, A. A., 2005, “Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Theory of Water Impact,” Proc. 18th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM), Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Korobkin, A. A., and Scolan, Y. M., 2006, “Three-Dimensional Theory of Water Impact. Part 2. Linearized Wagner Problem,” J. Fluid Mech., 549, pp. 343–373. [CrossRef]
Seddon, C. M., and Moatamedi, M., 2006, “Review of Water Entry With Applications to Aerospace Structures,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 32, pp. 1045–1067. [CrossRef]
Scolan, Y. M., and Korobkin, A. A., 2012, “Hydrodynamic Impact (Wagner) Problem and Galin's Theorem,” Proc. 27th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faltinsen, O. M., 2005, Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Wagner, H., 1932, “Transformation Phenomena Associated With Impacts and Sliding on Liquid Surfaces,” Math. Mech., 12(4), pp. 193–215.
Wang, J. T., and Lyle, K. H., 2007, “Simulating Space Capsule Water Landing With Explicit Finite Element Method,” 48th AIAA/ASME Conference, April, Waikiki, HI, pp. 23–26.
Hirano, Y., and Miura, K., 1970, “Water Impact Accelerations of Axially Symmetric Bodies,” J. Spacecraft Rockets, 7(6), pp. 762–764. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Overall configuration of WLO prototype (all dimensions are in mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Measured data of a 5 m drop test: Acceleration time history of a sample test case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Measured data of a 5 m drop test: Pressure time history of a sample test case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Consistency of measured peak acceleration and peak pressure versus sampling rate (PC based data acquisition)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Consistency of measured peak acceleration and peak pressure versus sampling rate (oscilloscope capture)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Electromagnet with protruding strut: (a) Up-close view of the setup for drop test II and (b) WLO touchdown with water surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Measured electromagnetic release data of a 5 m drop test: (a) Acceleration time history and (b) pressure time history

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Maximum impact force versus square of impact velocity (drop tests I and II)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Maximum impact pressure versus square of normalized impact velocity (drop tests I and II)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Equivalent radius of the WLO model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Maximum acceleration using von Karman and Wagner solutions (drop test II)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Maximum acceleration using von Karman and Wagner solutions (drop test I)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Maximum impact accelerations calculated based on the mean equivalent radius (r*) of the WLO for different normalized velocities of impact for drop test II using von Karman and Wagner approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Maximum impact accelerations calculated based on the mean equivalent radius (r*) of the WLO for different normalized velocities of impact for drop test I using von Karman and Wagner approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Equivalent radius (r) of the WLO for different normalized velocities of impact for drop test I and drop test II using von Karman and Wagner approaches

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In