0
Research Papers: Structures and Safety Reliability

Reliability Analysis of Offshore Production Facilities Under Arctic Conditions Using Reliability Data From Other Areas

[+] Author and Article Information
Abbas Barabadi

Associate Professor
Department of Engineering and Safety,
University of Tromsø,
Tromsø N-9037, Norway
e-mail: Abbas.b.abadi@uit.no

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received May 1, 2013; final manuscript received December 5, 2013; published online January 20, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Arne Gürtner.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 136(2), 021601 (Jan 20, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: OMAE-13-1043; doi: 10.1115/1.4026240 History: Received May 01, 2013; Revised December 05, 2013

The development of offshore energy resources involves highly complex and extensive technological processes. Reliability evaluation of offshore production facilities provides essential information in the design and operation phase. Historical reliability data play an important role in reliability analysis, and as such data reflect the effect of influencing factors that production facilities have experienced during their life cycle. Due to there being less offshore activity in the Arctic region compared with other areas, there is a lack of data and little experience available regarding operational equipment. In contrast to the Arctic region, oil and gas companies have a lot of experience and information related to the design and operation of offshore production facilities in the other parts of the world. Using this type of data and information, collected from similar systems but under different operational conditions, in design processes for the Arctic region may lead to incorrect design. This may increase health, safety, and environmental (HSE) risk or operating and maintenance costs. This paper develops a methodology for the application of the accelerated failure time model (AFT) to predict the reliability of equipment to be used in the Arctic region based on the available data. In the methodology used here, the available data is assumed to reflect the behavior of the equipment under low stress conditions, and using the AFT models the reliability of equipment in the Arctic environment, which represents high stress, is predicted. An illustrative example is used to demonstrate how the methodology can be applied in a real case.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Gudmestad, O. T., and Strass, P., 1994, “Technological Challenges for Hydrocarbon Production in the Barents Sea,” Hydrotech. Constr., 28(8), pp. 460–471. [CrossRef]
Heredia-Zavoni, E., Campos, D., and Ramírez, G., 2004, “Reliability Based Assessment of Deck Elevations for Offshore Jacket Platforms,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 126(4), pp. 331–336. [CrossRef]
Bea, R., Iversen, R., and Xu, T., 2001, “Wave-In-Deck Forces on Offshore Platforms,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 123(1), pp. 10–21. [CrossRef]
OREDA Participants, 2002, Offshore Reliability Data Handbook, DNV, Trondheim, Norway.
Sandtorv, H. A., Hokstad, P., and Thompson, D. W., 1996, “Practical Experience With a Data Collection Project: The Oreda Project,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 51(2), pp. 159–167. [CrossRef]
Kalbfleisch, J. D., and Prentice, R. L., 2011, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Interscience, New York.
Gao, X., Barabady, J., and Markeset, T., 2010, “An Approach for Prediction of Petroleum Production Facility Performance Considering Arctic Influence Factors,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 95(8), pp. 837–846. [CrossRef]
Kayrbekova, D., Barabadi, A., and Markeset, T., 2011, “Maintenance Cost Evaluation of a System to be Used in Arctic Conditions: A Case Study,” J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 17(4), pp. 320–336. [CrossRef]
Heredia-Zavoni, E., Silva-González, F., and Montes-Lturrizaga, R., 2008, “Reliability Analysis of Marine Platforms Subject to Fatigue Damage for Risk Based Inspection Planning,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 130(4), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Cox, D. R., 1972, “Regression Models and Life-Tables,” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 34(2), pp. 187–220.
Kumar, D., and Klefsjö, B., 1994, “Proportional Hazards Model: A Review,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 44(2), pp. 177–188. [CrossRef]
Nelson, W. B., 2009, Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analysis, Interscience, New York
Kleinbaum, D. G., 1998, “Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text,” Biom. J., 40(1), pp. 107–108. [CrossRef]
Mccullagh, P., 1980, “Regression Models for Ordinal Data,” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 42(2), pp. 109–142.
Barabadi, A., Barabady, J., and Markeset, T., 2011, “Maintainability Analysis Considering Time-Dependent and Time-Independent Covariates,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96(1), pp. 210–217. [CrossRef]
Kay, R., and Kinnersley, N., 2002, “On the Use of the Accelerated Failure Time Model as an Alternative to the Proportional Hazards Model in the Treatment of Time to Event Data: A Case Study in Influenza,” Drug Inf. J., 36(3), pp. 571–579. [CrossRef]
Lin, D., Wei, L., and Ying, Z., 1998, “Accelerated Failure Time Models for Counting Processes,” Biometrika, 85(3), pp. 605–618. [CrossRef]
Meeker, W. Q., and Escobar, L. A., 1993, “A Review of Recent Research and Current Issues in Accelerated Testing,” Int. Statist. Rev., 61(1), pp. 147–168. [CrossRef]
Meeker, W. Q., Escobar, L. A., and Lu, C. J., 1998, “Accelerated Degradation Tests: Modeling and Analysis,” Technometrics, 40(2), pp. 89–99. [CrossRef]
Blischke, W. R., and Murthy, D. P., 2003, Case Studies in Reliability and Maintenance, Interscience, New York.
Misra, K. B., 2008, The Handbook of Performability Engineering, Springer, New York.
Patel, K., Kay, R., and Rowell, L., 2006, “Comparing Proportional Hazards and Accelerated Failure Time Models: An Application in Influenza,” Pharm. Stat., 5(3), pp. 213–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Newby, M., 1988, “Accelerated Failure Time Models for Reliability Data Analysis,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 20(3), pp. 187–197. [CrossRef]
Escobar, L. A., and Meeker, W. Q., 2006, “A Review of Accelerated Test Models,” Stat. Sci., 21(4), pp. 552–577. [CrossRef]
Reliasoft, 2007, Accelerated Life Testing Reference, Reliasoft Publishing, Tucson, AZ.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The process of reliability analysis using AFT model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Temperature profile for selected component in production facility no. 1 (adapted from www.yr.no)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Residual plot for Arrhenius–Weibull (a) and Arrhenius-exponential (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Covariates profile of the target area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Reliability of the item in the target and reference area (production facility no. 1)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In