0
Special Section Articles

Aero-Hydro-Elastic Simulation of a Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
Maxime Philippe

LHEEA Lab. (ECN-CNRS),
École Centrale Nantes,
LUNAM Université,
Nantes 44321, France
e-mail: maxime.philippe@ec-nantes.fr

Aurélien Babarit

LHEEA Lab. (ECN-CNRS),
École Centrale Nantes,
LUNAM Université,
Nantes 44321, France
e-mail: aurelien.babarit@ec-nantes.fr

Pierre Ferrant

LHEEA Lab. (ECN-CNRS),
École Centrale Nantes,
LUNAM Université,
Nantes 44321, France
e-mail: pierre.ferrant@ec-nantes.fr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 15, 2013; final manuscript received May 8, 2013; published online March 24, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Krish Thiagarajan.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 136(2), 020908 (Mar 24, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: OMAE-13-1006; doi: 10.1115/1.4025031 History: Received January 15, 2013; Revised May 08, 2013

This paper presents an aero-hydro-elastic model of a semi-submersible floating wind turbine. A specific attention is drawn to hydrodynamic modeling options and their effect on the dynamic response of the platform. The NREL 5 MW reference wind turbine mounted on the historical concept of semi-submersible platform Dutch tri-floater is considered. A specific hydrodynamic model of loads on a semi-submersible platform is used within the wind turbine design code FAST from NREL. This hydrodynamic model includes nonlinear hydrostatic and Froude-Krylov forces, diffraction/radiation forces obtained from linear potential theory, and Morison forces to take into account viscous effects on the braces and damping plates. The effect of the different hydrodynamic modeling options is investigated. As one could have expected, it is found that the effect of viscous drag on braces, and nonlinear Froude-Krylov loads, becomes larger with increasing wave height. Their effect remains of small order. Simulations also are run with directional waves, it is found that wave directionality induces larger transverse motions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Roddier, D., Peiffer, A., Aubault, A., and Weinstein, J., 2011. “A Generic 5 MW Windfloat for Numerical Tool Validation and Comparison Against Generic Spar,” International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
Henderson, A., and Witcher, D., 2010, “Floating Offshore Wind Energy-A Review of the Current Status and an Assessment of the Prospects,” Wind Eng., 34(1), pp. 1–16. [CrossRef]
Wayman, E., Sclavounos, P., Butterfield, S., Jonkman, J., and Musial, W., 2006, “Coupled Dynamic Modeling of Floating Wind Turbine Systems,” 2006 Offshore Technology Conference, 1-4 May 2006, Houston, TX.
Jonkman, J., 2007, “Dynamics Modelling and Load Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Whithee, J., 2004, “Fully Coupled Dynamic Analysis of a Floating Wind Turbine System,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Ocean Engineering, MIT.
Jonkman, J., 2009, “Dynamics of Offshore Floating Wind Turbines - Model Development and Verification,” Wind Energy, 12, pp. 459–492. [CrossRef]
Cermelli, C., Roddier, D., and Aubault, A., 2009, “Windfloat: A Floating Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines Part Ii: Hydrodynamic Analysis,” International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
Ormberg, H., Passano, E., and Luxcey, N., 2011, “Global Analysis of a Floating Wind Turbine Using an Aero-Hydro-Elastic Model: Part 1-Code Development and Case Study,” International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
Jonkman, J., and Buhl, M., 2005, FAST User Guide, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
ECN, MARIN, L. t. W. T. T. M., 2002. Study to Feasibility of and Boundary Conditions for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines, Technical Report.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S., Cartwright, D. E., and Smith, N. D., 1961. “Observations of the Directional Spectrum of Sea Waves Using the Motions of a Floating Buoy,” Proc. Ocean Wave Spectrum, pp. 111–122.
Goda, Y., 2010, Random Seas and Design of Maritime Structures, Vol. 33, World Scientific, Singapore.
Kat, J. D., and Paulling, J., 1989, “The Simulation of Ship Motions and Capsizing in Severe Sea State,” Trans. SNMAE, 97, pp. 139–168.
Gilloteaux, J., Babarit, A., Ducrozet, G., Durand, M., and Clément, A., 2007. “A Non-Linear Potential Model to Predict Large-Amplitude-Motions: Application to the Searev Wave Energy Converter,” International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
Morison, J., O'Brien, M., Johnson, J., and Schaaf, S., 1950, “The Force Exerted By Surface Waves on Piles,” Petrol. Trans., 189, pp. 149–154. [CrossRef]
Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scott, G., 2009, “Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development,” Technical Report NREL/TP-500-39060, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Delhommeau, G., 1993. “Seakeeping Codes Aquadyn and Aquaplus,” 19th WEGEMT School Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamics: Ships and Offshore Structures.
Cermelli, C. A., and Roddier, D. G., 2005, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Stabilizing Effects of a Water-Entrapment Plate on a Deepwater Minimal Floating Platform,” International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
Ishihara, T., Waris, M., and Sukegawa, H., 2009, “A Study on Influence of Heave Plate on Dynamic Response of Floating Offshore Wind Turbine System,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Offshore Wind Conference and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 14–16.
Bearman, P., Downie, M., Graham, J., and Obasaju, E., 1985, “Forces on Cylinders in Viscous Oscillatory Flow at Low Keulegan-Carpenter Numbers,” J. Fluid Mech., 154(1), pp. 337–356. [CrossRef]
Sarpkaya, T., and Isaacson, M., 1981, Mechanics of Wave Forces on Offshore Structures, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Tao, L., and Cai, S., 2004, “Heave Motion Suppression of a sapr With a Heave Plate,” Ocean Eng., 31, pp. 669–692. [CrossRef]
Orcina, 2010, OrcaFlex User Manual v 9.4a. Orcina Ltd.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Directional wave spectrum for γ = 1 (Pierson-Moskowitz) and s = 40

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Simulation of the Dutch tri-floater in irregular directional waves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) View of the platform, (b) mesh of the braces for Morison drag loads calculation, (c) mesh of Dutch tri-floater platform used with Aquaplus for potential flow calculation, and (d) mesh used for nonlinear Froude-Krylov loads calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Picture of the mooring system modeling with OrcaFlex [23]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effective RAOs of the platform surge, heave, pitch, and yaw motions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effective RAOs of the tower top deflection and out of plane blade tip deflection

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Amplitude of pitch motion and tower base pitching moment around a mean value with regards to wave amplitude for an incident wave of pulsation ω = 1 rad s−1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Amplitude of pitch motion and tower base pitching moment around a mean value with regards to wave amplitude for an incident wave of pulsation ω = 0.6 rad s−1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Wave elevation for irregular directional waves and unidirectional waves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of pitch and yaw motions in irregular directional waves and unidirectional waves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of tower base moment for the case of irregular unidirectional and directional waves

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In