0
Research Papers: Materials Technology

Underwater Friction Stud Welding Optimal Parameter Estimation: Engineering Robust Design Based Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
R. M. Chandima Ratnayake

Department of Mechanical and Structural
Engineering and Materials Science,
University of Stavanger,
Stavanger N-4036, Norway
e-mail: chandima.ratnayake@uis.no

H. O. Ytterhaug

Department of Mechanical and Structural
Engineering and Materials Science,
University of Stavanger,
Stavanger N-4036, Norway
e-mail: hans_olav_ytterhaug@hotmail.com

P. Bogwald

Department of Mechanical and Structural
Engineering and Materials Science,
University of Stavanger,
Stavanger N-4036, Norway
e-mail: pbogwald@gmail.com

S. T. R. Nilsen

Department of Mechanical and Structural
Engineering and Materials Science,
University of Stavanger,
Stavanger N-4036, Norway
e-mail: str.nilsen@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 4, 2014; final manuscript received August 25, 2014; published online September 25, 2014. Assoc. Editor: John Halkyard.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 137(1), 011401 (Sep 25, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: OMAE-14-1021; doi: 10.1115/1.4028466 History: Received March 04, 2014; Revised August 25, 2014

Underwater friction stud welding (FRSW) without a shroud around the stud requires controlling welding parameters to achieve optimal joint strength. A hydraulic FRSW unit has been designed and fabricated to perform FRSW without a shroud via a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV). An experimental study has been initiated to investigate the optimal FRSW parameter combinations and corresponding values leading to optimal ultimate tensile load capacity (UTLC) values in the welded joint. The engineering robust design (ERD) approach has been deployed to run the experiment. Each weld has been made with a S355 M12 stud on S355 structural steel plate. This paper discusses the experimental approach, results and conclusions reached in the parameter evaluation, estimation, and experimentation.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

FRSW test rig: CAD model versus prototype

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A container to create underwater conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

A motor coupling to hold the stud and tightening of test stud into the motor coupling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Arrangement of stud and a sample plate in the FRSW test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

An arrangement of the plate inside the water container on the hydraulic cylinder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Plots of parameter effects versus levels. (a) Pressure versus S/N ratio, (b) speed versus S/N ratio, (c) FT versus S/N ratio, and (d) HT versus S/N ratio.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Approximate positions of hardness measurement zones

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Microstructure of the base plate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Microstructure at zone 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Microstructure at zone 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Microstructure at the extruded flash

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Base metal zone of the stud

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In