Research Papers: Piper and Riser Technology

The Model Test of Deep Water S-Lay Stinger Using Dynamical Substructure Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Xiangfeng Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis
and Industrial Equipment,
Dalian University of Technology,
Dalian 116024, China
Geophysical Department Subsea Engineering
and Technical Center,
China Oilfield Services Limited,
Tianjin 300452, China
e-mail: zxfdut@outlook.com

Qianjin Yue

State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis
and Industrial Equipment,
Dean of School of Ocean
Science and Technology,
Dalian University of Technology,
Dalian 116024, China
e-mail: yueqj@dlut.edu.cn

Wenshou Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis
and Industrial Equipment,
Dalian University of Technology,
Dalian 116024, China
e-mail: wszhang@dlut.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received August 13, 2013; final manuscript received October 15, 2014; published online November 17, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Longbin Tao.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 137(1), 011701 (Feb 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: OMAE-13-1076; doi: 10.1115/1.4028879 History: Received August 13, 2013; Revised October 15, 2014; Online November 17, 2014

Deep water pipeline installations by S-lay present many challenges, especially in the overbend section. The S-lay requires a long curved and stiff stinger to support the pipeline weight. The interaction between the overbend pipe and stinger is complicated such that the numerical structure analysis could not sufficiently predict the mechanical behavior of the installing process. A dynamic substructure model test method with 1:20 length scale for 2000 m water depth is addressed in this paper, where the large scale model structure can be tested to simulate the vessel movements during installation. The roller forces influenced by the stinger stiffness and vessel movements are discussed based on the test platform.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The principle of the substructure simulation platform

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Static roller loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Partial cycles of hull motions: (a) Heave, (b) roll, and (c) pitch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Dynamic roller loads for different roller locations: (a) roller 2, (b) roller 5, and (c) roller 8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Dynamic roller loads for different wave approach angles: (a) 0 deg, (b) 45 deg, and (c) 90 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The impact of stinger structural rigidity on roller contact states

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

The ΔRd envelope

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variations of roller forces with ν

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Concentrated roller loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Finite element model of stinger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Mechanical model of the stinger in substructure 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Substructures and the overbend section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Substructure models: (a) stinger and overbend model, (b) sagbend model, and (c) pipelay vessel model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The pup piece and the roller arrangement




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In