0
Research Papers: Structures and Safety Reliability

Statistics of Extreme Wind Speeds and Wave Heights by the Bivariate ACER Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Arvid Naess

Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures;
Department of Mathematical Sciences,
Norwegian University of Science
and Technology,
Trondheim NO-7491, Norway
e-mail: arvid.naess@ntnu.no

Oleh Karpa

Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures,
Norwegian University of Science
and Technology,
Trondheim NO-7491, Norway
e-mail: oleh.karpa@ntnu.no

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 30, 2013; final manuscript received December 3, 2014; published online January 20, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Lance Manuel.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 137(2), 021602 (Apr 01, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: OMAE-13-1091; doi: 10.1115/1.4029370 History: Received September 30, 2013; Revised December 03, 2014; Online January 20, 2015

In the reliability engineering and design of offshore structures, probabilistic approaches are frequently adopted. They require the estimation of extreme quantiles of oceanographic data based on the statistical information. Due to strong correlation between such random variables as, e.g., wave heights and wind speeds (WS), application of the multivariate, or bivariate in the simplest case, extreme value theory is sometimes necessary. The paper focuses on the extension of the average conditional exceedance rate (ACER) method for prediction of extreme value statistics to the case of bivariate time series. Using the ACER method, it is possible to provide an accurate estimate of the extreme value distribution of a univariate time series. This is obtained by introducing a cascade of conditioning approximations to the true extreme value distribution. When it has been ascertained that this cascade has converged, an estimate of the extreme value distribution has been obtained. In this paper, it will be shown how the univariate ACER method can be extended in a natural way to also cover the case of bivariate data. Application of the bivariate ACER method will be demonstrated for measured coupled WS and wave height data.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Gumbel, E. J., 1960, “Multivariate Extremal Distributions,” Bull. l'Institut Int. Stat., 37(2), pp. 471–475.
Gumbel, E. J., 1960, “Bivariate Exponential Distributions,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 55(292), pp. 698–707. [CrossRef]
Gumbel, E. J., 1961, “Bivariate Logistic Distributions,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 56(294), pp. 335–349. [CrossRef]
Gumbel, E. J., and Mustafi, C. K., 1967, “Some Analytical Properties of Bivariate Extremal Distributions,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 62(318), pp. 569–588. [CrossRef]
Coles, S. G., and Tawn, J. A., 1991, “Modeling Extreme Multivariate Events,” J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 53(2), pp. 377–392.
Coles, S. G., and Tawn, J. A., 1994, “Statistical Methods for Multivariate Extremes: An Application to Structural Design,” J. R. Stat. Soc. C, 43(1), pp. 1–48.
Zachary, S., Feld, G., Ward, G., and Wolfram, J., 1998, “Multivariate Extrapolation in the Offshore Environment,” Appl. Ocean Res., 20(5), pp. 273–295. [CrossRef]
de Haan, L., and de Ronde, J., 1998, “Sea and Wind: Multivariate Extremes at Work,” Extremes, 1(1), pp. 7–45. [CrossRef]
Coles, S., 2001, An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values (Springer Series in Statistics), Springer-Verlag, London, UK. [CrossRef]
Waal, D., and Gelder, P., 2005, “Modeling of Extreme Wave Heights and Periods Through Copulas,” Extremes, 8, pp. 345–356. [CrossRef]
Tawn, J. A., 1988, “Bivariate Extreme Value Theory: Models and Estimation,” Biometrika, 75(3), pp. 397–415. [CrossRef]
Pickands, J., 1981, “Multivariate Extreme Value Distributions,” Proceedings of the 43rd Session of the International Statistical Institute, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 49, pp. 859–878.
Balakrishnan, N., and Lai, C.-D., 2009, Continuous Bivariate Distributions, Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
Kaufmann, E., and Reiss, R.-D., 1995, “Approximation Rates for Multivariate Exceedances,” J. Stat. Plann. Inference, 45(12), pp. 235–245. [CrossRef]
Naess, A., 2011, “A Note on the Bivariate ACER Method,” Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Preprint Statistics No. 01/2011.
Sklar, M., 1959, Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges, Publications of the Institute of Statistics of the University of Paris, Paris, France, Vol. 8, pp. 229–231.
Nelsen, R. B., 2006, An Introduction to Copulas (Springer Series in Statistics), Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
Gudendorf, G., and Segers, J., 2010, “Extreme-Value Copulas,” Copula Theory and Its Applications, P.Jaworski, F.Durante, W.Härdle, and T.Rychlik, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, Chap. 6. [CrossRef]
Hougaard, P., 1986, “A Class of Multivariate Failure Time Distributions,” Biometrika, 73(3), pp. 671–678. [CrossRef]
Tiago de Oliveira, J., 1984, “Bivariate Models for Extremes; Statistical Decision,” Statistical Extremes and Applications, Springer, New York, pp. 131–153.
Yue, S., Ouarda, T., Bobée, B., Legendre, P., and Bruneau, P., 1999, “The Gumbel Mixed Model for Flood Frequency Analysis,” J. Hydrol., 226(1–2), pp. 88–100. [CrossRef]
Yue, S., 2000, “The Gumbel Mixed Model Applied to Storm Frequency Analysis,” Water Resour. Manage., 14(5), pp. 377–389. [CrossRef]
Yue, S., 2001, “The Gumbel Logistic Model for Representing a Multivariate Storm Event,” Adv. Water Resour., 24(2), pp. 179–185. [CrossRef]
Yue, S., 2001, “A Bivariate Extreme Value Distribution Applied to Flood Frequency Analysis,” Nord. Hydrol., 32(1), pp. 49–64. [CrossRef]
Yue, S., and Wang, C. Y., 2004, “A Comparison of Two Bivariate Extreme Value Distributions,” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 18(2), pp. 61–66. [CrossRef]
Tiago de Oliveira, J., 1982, “Bivariate Extremes: Models and Statistical Decision,” Center for Stochastic Processes, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, Technical Report No. 14.
Karpa, O., and Naess, A., 2013, “Extreme Value Statistics of Wind Speed Data by the ACER Method,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 112, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Naess, A., and Gaidai, O., 2009, “Estimation of Extreme Values From Sampled Time Series,” Struct. Saf., 31(4), pp. 325–334. [CrossRef]
Karpa, O., 2012, “ACER User Guide,” http://folk.ntnu.no/karpa/ACER/ACER_User_guide.pdf
Naess, A., 1985, “The Joint Crossing Frequency of Stochastic Processes and Its Application to Wave Theory,” Appl. Ocean Res., 7(1), pp. 35–50. [CrossRef]
Naess, A., 1990, “Approximate First-Passage and Extremes of Narrow-Band Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Random Vibrations,” J. Sound Vib., 138(3), pp. 365–380. [CrossRef]
Watson, G. S., 1954, “Extreme Values in Samples From m-Dependent Stationary Stochastic Processes,” Ann. Math. Stat., 25(4), pp. 798–800. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Map of the part of Scandinavia with marked location

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Coupled observations of WS data (ξ axis) and Hs data (total sea, η axis)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison between ACER estimates for different degrees of conditioning. WS data.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison between ACER estimates for different degrees of conditioning. Hs (total sea).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Plot of ɛ∧2(ξ) versus WS ξ on a logarithmic scale for the optimized parameter values; ξ1=14.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Plot of ɛ∧2(η) against wave heights η on a logarithmic scale for the optimized parameter values; η1=4.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison between bivariate ACER surface estimates for different degrees of conditioning. E∧k(ξ,η) surfaces are plotted on a logarithmic scale.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Contour plot of the empirically estimated E∧2(ξ,η) surface (•), optimized GL, GL2(ξ,η), (°), and optimized logistical, AL2(ξ,η), (—) surfaces. Boxes indicate levels on a logarithmic scale

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contour plot of the return period levels for E∧2(ξ,η) surface (•), optimized AL, AL2(ξ,η), (—), and optimized GL, GL2(ξ,η), (°) surfaces. Boxes indicate return period levels in years.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In