0
Research Papers: Polar and Arctic Engineering

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Dynamic Positioning in Level Ice

[+] Author and Article Information
Ivan Metrikin

Department of Civil and Transport Engineering,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology,
Trondheim 7491, Norway;
Arctic Design and Operations,
Statoil ASA,
Trondheim 7053, Norway
e-mail: ivan.metrikin@ntnu.no

Sofien Kerkeni

D-ICE Engineering,
Nantes 44000, France;
DCNS Research/Sirehna,
Nantes 44300, France

Peter Jochmann

Ice and Offshore Department,
Hamburg Ship Model Basin,
Hamburg 22305, Germany

Sveinung Løset

Department of Civil and Transport Engineering,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology,
Trondheim 7491, Norway

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 6, 2013; final manuscript received March 8, 2015; published online April 8, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Søren Ehlers.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 137(3), 031501 (Jun 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-13-1085; doi: 10.1115/1.4030042 History: Received September 06, 2013; Revised March 08, 2015; Online April 08, 2015

Offshore operations in ice-covered waters are drawing considerable interest from both the public and private sectors. Such operations may require vessels to keep position during various activities, such as lifting, installation, crew change, evacuation, and possibly drilling. In deep waters, mooring solutions become uneconomical and, therefore, dynamic positioning (DP) systems are attractive. However, global loads from drifting sea ice can be challenging for stationkeeping operations of DP vessels. To address this challenge, the current paper investigates DP in level ice conditions using experimental and numerical approaches. The experimental part describes a set of ice model tests which were performed at the large ice tank of the Hamburg Ship Model Basin (HSVA) in the summer and autumn of 2012. Experimental design, instrumentation, methods, and results are presented and discussed. The numerical part presents a novel model for simulating DP operations in level ice, which treats both the vessel and the ice floes as separate independent bodies with six degrees-of-freedom. The fracture of level ice is calculated on-the-fly based on numerical solution of the ice material failure equations, i.e., the breaking patterns of the ice are not precalculated. The numerical model is connected to a DP controller and the two systems interchange data dynamically and work in a closed-loop. The structures of the models, as well as the physical and mathematical assumptions, are discussed in the paper. Finally, several ice basin experiments are reproduced in the numerical simulator, and the results of the physical and numerical tests are compared and discussed.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Ice , Vessels , Simulation
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Gürtner, A., Baardson, B. H. H., Kaasa, G.-O., and Lundin, E., 2012, “Aspects of Importance Related to Arctic DP Operations,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2012-84226. [CrossRef]
Hamilton, J. M., 2011, “The Challenges of Deep-Water Arctic Development,” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 21(4), pp. 241–247.
Keinonen, A., Wells, H., Dunderdale, P., Pilkington, R., Miller, G., and Brovin, A., 2000, “Dynamic Positioning Operation in Ice, Offshore Sakhalin, May–June 1999,” Proceedings of the 10th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, J. S.Chung, R. M. W.Frederking, H.Saeki, and W.Koterayama, eds., International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Seattle, WA, Vol. 1, pp. 683–690.
Moran, K., Backman, J., and Farrell, J. W., 2006, “Deepwater Drilling in the Arctic Ocean's Permanent Sea Ice,” Proceedings of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, J.Backman, K.Moran, D. B.McInroy, and L. A.Mayer, eds., Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc., Edinburgh, Scotland, Vol. 302, Paper No. MS 302-106.
Rohlén, Å., 2009, “Relationship Between Ice-Management and Station Keeping in Ice,” Proceedings of the Dynamic Positioning Conference, Marine Technology Society, Houston, TX.
Baardson, B. H. H., 2012, “Dynamic Positioning of Arctic Drillship in Managed Ice,” MSc. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Jenssen, N. A., Hals, T., Jochmann, P., Haase, A., dal Santo, X., Kerkeni, S., Doucy, O., Gürtner, A., Støle Hetschel, S., Moslet, P. O., Metrikin, I., and Løset, S., 2012, “DYPIC—A Multi-National R&D Project on DP Technology in Ice,” Dynamic Positioning Conference, Marine Technology Society, Houston, TX.
van der Werff, S., 2012, “Dynamic Positioning in Ice,” MSc. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Deter, D., Doelling, W., Lembke-Jene, L., and Wegener, A., 2009, “Stationkeeping in Solid Drift Ice,” Dynamic Positioning Conference, Marine Technology Society, Houston, TX.
Hals, T., and Efraimsson, F., 2011, “DP Ice Model Test of Arctic Drillship,” Dynamic Positioning Conference, Marine Technology Society, Houston, TX.
Hals, T., and Jenssen, N. A., 2012, “DP Ice Model Test of Arctic Drillship and Polar Research Vessel,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2012-83352. [CrossRef]
Jenssen, N. A., Muddesitti, S., and Phillips, D., 2009, “DP in Ice Conditions,” Dynamic Positioning Conference, Marine Technology Society, Houston, TX.
Kuehnlein, W. L., 2009, “Philosophies for Dynamic Positioning in Ice-Covered Waters,” Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC, Houston, TX, Paper No. OTC 20019.
van der Werff, S., Haase, A., Huijsmans, R., and Zhang, Q., 2012, “Influence of the Ice Concentration on the Ice Loads on the Hull of a Ship in a Managed Ice Field,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2012-83927. [CrossRef]
Eik, K. J., 2010, “Ice Management in Arctic Offshore Operations and Field Developments,” Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Løset, S., Shkhinek, K. N., Gudmestad, O. T., and Høyland, K. V., 2006, Actions From Ice on Arctic Offshore and Coastal Structures, LAN, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 2015, “Class Notations—Propulsion and Machinery,” https://exchange.dnv.com/Exchange/en/MainClass.html, Last Accessed: Mar. 3, 2015.
Häusler, F., Hellmann, J.-H., Rupp, K.-H., and Evers, K.-E., 1998, “Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung einer Eisdecke, inbesondere für Modellversuche mit Schiffen oder Meeresbauwerken,” U.S. Patent No. DE 4106930 C2.
dal Santo, X., and Jochmann, P., 2012, “Model DP System for Ice-Tank Research,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2012-83383. [CrossRef]
Haase, A., van der Werff, S., and Jochmann, P., 2012, “DYPIC—Dynamic Positioning in Ice: First Phase of Model Testing,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2012-83455. [CrossRef]
Haase, A., and Jochmann, P., 2013, “DYPIC—Dynamic Positioning in Ice: Second Phase of Model Testing,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2013-10789. [CrossRef]
Kerkeni, S., dal Santo, X., and Metrikin, I., 2013, “Dynamic Positioning in Ice: Comparison of Control Laws in Open Water and in Ice,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2013-10918. [CrossRef]
Marchenko, A., Kvamstad, B., Fjørtoft, K., Høyland, K., and Brazhnikov, D., 2011, “Characteristics of Ice Drift in the Western Barents Sea Reconstructed by the Data of Ice Trackers Deployed on Drifting Ice of the Barents Sea in 2008 and 2010,” Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions, Montréal, Canada, Paper No. POAC11-147.
Kerkeni, S., Metrikin, I., and Jochmann, P., 2013, “Capability Plots of Dynamic Positioning in Ice,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2013-10912. [CrossRef]
Metrikin, I., Løset, S., Jenssen, N. A., and Kerkeni, S., 2013, “Numerical Simulation of Dynamic Positioning in Ice,” Mar. Technol. Soc. J., 47(2), pp. 14–30. [CrossRef]
Nguyen, D. T., Sørbø, A. H., and Sørensen, A. J., 2009, “Modeling and Control for Dynamic Positioned Vessels in Level Ice,” Proceedings of the 8th International IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft, Elsevier, Guaruja, SP, Brazil, pp. 229–236.
Zhou, L., Moan, T., Riska, K., and Su, B., 2013, “Heading Control for Turret-Moored Vessel in Level Ice Based on Kalman Filter With Thrust Allocation,” J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 18(4), pp. 460–470. [CrossRef]
Zhou, Q., and Peng, H., 2014, “Numerical Simulation of a Dynamically Controlled Ship in Level Ice,” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 24(3), pp. 184–191.
Metrikin, I., 2014, “A Software Framework for Simulating Stationkeeping of a Vessel in Discontinuous Ice,” Model., Identif. Control, 35(4), pp. 211–248. [CrossRef]
CMLabs, 2015, “Vortex Dynamics Software,” http://www.cm-labs.com/market/robotics/products/vortex-dynamics-software, Last Accessed: Mar. 3, 2015.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Sketch of the large ice model basin of HSVA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Body plan of the DP vessel: Left: bow view and right: stern view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Model of the DP vessel: Left: bow view and right: stern view. White marks indicate the waterline.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Propellers of the DP vessel: Left: bow propellers (all three are the same), middle: stern starboard (same as stern port), and right: stern center

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Thrust–RPS relationship for the propellers of the DP vessel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental setup for DP in level ice

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Trace of the DP vessel in ice basin trials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Heading offset of the DP vessel in ice basin trials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Ice loads on the DP vessel in ice basin trials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Trajectories of the ice motion around the vessel seen from underwater cameras: Left: port side and right: starboard side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Cusps and wedges of broken ice in the channel behind the DP vessel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Drillship on DP at 15 deg oblique angle in level ice

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Trace of the DP vessel at 0 deg ice drift angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Ice loads estimated by the DP system at 0 deg ice drift angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Surface mesh of the DP vessel used in numerical simulations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Screenshots from a numerical simulation of DP in level ice

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Simulated trace of the DP vessel at 0 deg ice drift angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Ice loads estimated by the DP system at 0 deg ice drift angle in simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Estimated ice loads on the DP vessel in simulations at high ice drift angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Trace of the DP vessel in simulations at high ice drift angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Comparison between experiments and simulation at 30 deg ice drift angle

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In