0
Research Papers: Offshore Technology

Dynamic Asynchronous Coupled Analysis and Experimental Study for a Turret Moored FPSO in Random Seas

[+] Author and Article Information
Shan Ma

College of Shipbuilding Engineering,
Harbin Engineering University,
Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China
e-mail: mashan01@hrbeu.edu.cn

Wen Y. Duan, Xu L. Han

College of Shipbuilding Engineering,
Harbin Engineering University,
Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received May 31, 2014; final manuscript received May 19, 2015; published online June 15, 2015. Assoc. Editor: M. H. (Moo-Hyun) Kim.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 137(4), 041302 (Aug 01, 2015) (13 pages) Paper No: OMAE-14-1060; doi: 10.1115/1.4030681 History: Received May 31, 2014; Revised May 19, 2015; Online June 15, 2015

The dynamic coupling analysis between floating platform and mooring/risers is one of the challenging topics in development of oil and gas exploration in deepwater area. In this paper, the dynamic coupled analysis model for a turret-moored floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) is developed. In order to improve the computational efficiency, the proposed asynchronous coupling model is extended to application for FPSO coupled dynamic analysis. In order to validate the developed dynamic coupling analysis model, the vessel global motion and mooring tensions for the turret moored tanker KVLCC2 were tested in China Ship Scientific Research Center (CSSRC) wave basin. In this paper, the numerically predicted coupled response is directly compared with those from model test in time domain. The research focus is in the following: (1) Through comparison of free decay surge motion in calm water/regular wave, the damping effect from mooring on drift motion is validated and confirmed; (2) The physical phenomena of wave drift damping effect on slowly varying surge motion are theoretically explained making use of the related hydrodynamic model and physical model test; (3) In random seas, the simulated vessel motions and mooring tensions generally show fairly good match in time records with model test. But there is phase difference between simulation and measurements after tens of minutes in model test scale, the exact reason is not known yet; and (4) Another interesting phenomena in model test are the existence of unstable horizontal sway and yaw motion, which are not well predicted by current numerical model, the further research is needed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ormberg, H., and Larsen, K., 1998, “Coupled Analysis of Floater Motion and Mooring Dynamics for a Turret-Moored Ship,” Appl. Ocean Res., 20(1–2), pp. 55–67. [CrossRef]
Pauling, J. R., and Webster, W. C., 1986, “A Consistent Large-Amplitude Analysis of the Coupled Response of a TLP and Tendon System,” 5th OMAE Conference, Tokyo, Japan, Vol. 3, pp. 126–133.
Ran, Z., and Kim, M. H., 1997, “Nonlinear Coupled Responses of a Tethered Spar Platform in Waves,” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 7(2), pp. 111–118.
Kim, M. H., Ran, Z., and Zheng, W., 1999, “Hull/Mooring/Riser Coupled Dynamic Analysis of a Truss Spar in Time Domain,” ISOPE ‘99, Brest, Vol. 1, pp. 301–308.
Ran, Z., 2000, “Coupled Dynamic Analysis of Floating Structures in Waves and Current,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Ma, W., Lee, M. Y., Zou, J., and Huang, E. W., 2000, “Deepwater Nonlinear Coupled Analysis Tool,” Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Paper No. OTC 12085. [CrossRef]
Zou, J., 2003, “TLP Hull/Tendon/Riser Coupled Dynamic Analysis in Deepwater,” 13th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, HI, pp. 160–166.
Rover, F. E., Rodrigues, M. V., and Jacob, B. P., 2004, “Coupled Motion Analysis of a Semisubmersible Platform in Campos Basin,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2004-51120. [CrossRef]
Low, Y. M., and Langley, R. S., 2006, “Time and Frequency Domain Coupled Analysis of Deepwater Floating Production Systems,” Appl. Ocean Res., 28(6), pp. 371–385. [CrossRef]
Low, Y. M., and Langley, R. S., 2008, “A Hybrid Time/Frequency Domain Approach for Efficient Coupled Analysis of Vessel/Mooring/Riser Dynamics,” Ocean Eng., 35(5–6), pp. 433–446. [CrossRef]
Rho, J. B., Korobkin, A. A., Jung, J. J., Shin, H. S., and Lee, W. S., 2007, “Coupled Analysis of Deepwater Floating System Including VIV in Time Domain,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2007-29523. [CrossRef]
Yang, M., Teng, B., Ning, D., and Shi, Z., 2012, “Coupled Dynamic Analysis for Wave Interaction With a Truss Spar and Its Mooring Line/Riser System in Time Domain,” Ocean Eng., 39(1), pp. 72–87. [CrossRef]
Jacob, B. P., Bahiense, R. A., Correa, F. N., and Jacovazzo, B. M., 2012, “Parallel Implementations of Coupled Formulations for the Analysis of Floating Production Systems, Part I: Coupling Formulations,” Ocean Eng., 55(1), pp. 206–218. [CrossRef]
Jacob, B. P., Franco, L. D., Rodrigues, M. V., Correa, F. N., and Jacovazzo, B. M., 2012, “Parallel Implementations of Coupled Formulations for the Analysis of Floating Production Systems, Part II: Domain Decomposition Strategies,” Ocean Eng., 55(1), pp. 219–234. [CrossRef]
Jing, X., Webster, W. C., Xu, Q., and Lambrakos, K., 2011, “Coupled Dynamic Modeling of a Moored Floating Platform With Risers,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2011-49553. [CrossRef]
Ma, S., and Duan, W. Y., 2013, “Asynchronous Coupling Analysis of Dynamic Response for Deepwater Moored Floating Platform,” 8th International Workshop on Ship Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, Paper No. IWSH2013-P3B-3.
Ma, S., and Duan, W. Y., 2014, “Dynamic Coupled Analysis of the Floating Platform Using the Asynchronous Algorithm,” J. Mar. Sci. Appl., 13(1), pp. 85–91. [CrossRef]
Kim, M. H., Koo, B. J., Mercier, R. M., and Ward, E. G., 2005, “Vessel/Mooring/Riser Coupled Dynamic Analysis of a Turret-Moored FPSO Compared With OTRC Experiment,” Ocean Eng., 32(14–15), pp. 1780–1802. [CrossRef]
Wichers, J. E. W., and Sluijsm, F. V., 1979, “The Influence of Waves on the Low-Frequency Hydrodynamic Coefficients of Moored Vessels,” Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Paper No. OTC 3625. [CrossRef]
Chen, X. B., 2010, Hydrostar for Experts User Manual, Bureau Veritas, Paris.
Newman, J. N., 1974, “Second-Order, Slowly Varying Forces on Vessels in Irregular Waves,” International Symposium on the Dynamics of Marine Vehicles and Structures in Waves, London, pp. 182–186.
Chen, X. B., and Rezende, F., 2009, “Efficient Computations of Second Order Low Frequency Wave Load,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2009-79522. [CrossRef]
Newman, J. N., 1993, “Wave Drift Damping of Floating Bodies,” J. Fluid Mech., 249(8), pp. 241–259. [CrossRef]
Faltinsen, O. M., 1990, Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, p. 160.
Nossen, J., Grue, J., and Palm, E., 1991, “Wave Forces on Three-Dimensional Floating Bodies With Small Forward Speed,” J. Fluid Mech., 227(12), pp. 135–160. [CrossRef]
Emmerhoff, J. K., and Sclavounops, D., 1992, “The Slow-Drift Motion of Arrays of Vertical Cylinders,” J. Fluid Mech., 242(18), pp. 31–60. [CrossRef]
Zhao, R., and Faltinsen, O. M., 1990, “Interaction Between Current, Waves and Marine Structures,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, K.Mori, ed., National Academy of Science Press, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 513–525.
Grue, J., and Palm, E., 1996, “Wave Drift Damping of Floating Bodies in Slow Yaw Motion,” J. Fluid Mech., 319(14), pp. 323–352. [CrossRef]
Aranha, J. A. P., 1991, “Wave Groups and Slow Motion of an Ocean Structure,” 6th International Workshop Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Woods Hole, MA.
Aranha, J. A. P., 1994, “A Formula for Wave Damping in the Drift of a Floating Body,” J. Fluid Mech., 275(18), pp. 147–155. [CrossRef]
Clark, P. J., Malenica, S., and Molin, B., 1993, “An Heuristic Approach to Wave Drift Damping,” Appl. Ocean Res., 15(1), pp. 53–55. [CrossRef]
Aranha, J. A. P., 1996, “Second-Order Horizontal Steady Forces and Moment on a Floating Body With Small Forward Speed,” J. Fluid Mech., 313(8), pp. 39–54. [CrossRef]
Molin, B., 2012, Hydrodynamics of Offshore Structures, 1st ed., National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, p. 226 (in Chinese).
OCIMF, 1994, Prediction of Wind and Current Loads on VLCCs, 2nd ed., Oil Companies International Marine Forum, London.
Tahar, A., and Kim, M. H., 2003, “Hull/Mooring/Riser Coupled Dynamic Analysis and Sensitivity Study of a Tanker-Based FPSO,” Appl. Ocean Res., 25(1), pp. 367–382. [CrossRef]
Ma, G., 2009, “Dynamic Research of Deepwater Mooring Line and Riser Based on Elastic Rod Theory,” M.S. thesis, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China.
Wichers, J. E. W., 1988, “A Simulation Model for a Single Point Moored Tanker” Publication No. 797, Maritime Research Institute Netherlands, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Papoulias, F. A., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1988, “Autonomous Oscillations, Bifurcations, and Chaotic Response of Moored Vessels,” J. Ship Res., 32(3), pp. 220–228.
Chung, J. S., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1992, “Dynamics of Two Line Ship Towing/Mooring Systems: Bifurcations, Singularities of Stability Boundaries, Chaos,” J. Ship Res., 36(2), pp. 123–140.
Garza-Rios, L. O., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1996, “Analytical Expressions of the Stability and Bifurcation Boundaries for General Spread Mooring Systems,” J. Ship Res., 40(4), pp. 337–350.
Garza-Rios, L. O., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1999, “Slow Motion Dynamics of Turret Mooring and Its Approximations as Single Point Mooring,” Appl. Ocean Res., 21(1), pp. 27–39. [CrossRef]
Matsuura, J. P. J., Bernitsas, M. M., and Garza-Rios, L. O., 2002, “Sensitivity and Robustness of Hydrodynamic Mooring Models,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 124(4), pp. 179–189. [CrossRef]
Bernitsas, M. M., Matsuura, J. P. J., and Andersen, T., 2004, “Mooring Dynamics Phenomena Due to Slowly-Varying Wave Drift,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 126(4), pp. 280–286. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The layout configuration of the mooring system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) The free decay simulation and comparison of surge motion with model test in calm water for relatively small initial offset and (b) the free decay simulation and comparison of surge motion with model test in calm water for relatively large initial offset

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The free decay simulation and comparison of surge motion with model test in regular wave with wave period of 15.75 s and wave height of 9.0 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The free decay simulation and comparison of surge motion with model test in regular wave with wave period of 9.22 s and wave height of 4.2 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The wave drift damping coefficient Bd11 in head seas for free restrained tanker

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Regular wave component amplitude via FFT of wave elevation at wave gauge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Wave elevation via FFT at wave gauge location and origin of earth fixed coordinates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) The comparison of surge motion history between 0 and 4000 s, (b) the comparison of surge motion history between 4000 and 8000 s, (c) the comparison of surge motion history after 8000 s, and (d) the comparison of surge motion energy spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) The comparison of heave motion history between 2000 and 2200 s, (b) the comparison of heave motion history between 5000 and 5200 s, (c) the comparison of heave motion history after 8000 s, and (d) the comparison of heave motion energy spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) The comparison of pitch motion history between 2000 and 2200 s, (b) the comparison of pitch motion history between 5000 and 5200 s, (c) the comparison of pitch motion history after 8000 s, and (d) the comparison of pitch motion energy spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) The comparison of No. 3 line axial tension time history between 600 and 2000 s, (b) the comparison of No. 3 line axial tension time history between 4000 and 6000 s, (c) the comparison of No. 3 line axial tension time history after 8000 s, and (d) the comparison of No. 3 line axial tension energy spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) The comparison of No. 5 line axial tension time history between 2000 and 2200 s, (b) the comparison of No. 5 line axial tension time history between 5000 and 5200 s, (c) the comparison of No. 5 line axial tension time history after 8000 s, and (d) the comparison of No. 5 line axial tension energy spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a) The LF sway motion measurement in model test and (b) the LF yaw motion measurement in model test

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In