Research Papers: Piper and Riser Technology

Ovalization Defect in Energy Pipes Caused by Concentrated Load

[+] Author and Article Information
Hossein Ghaednia

Centre for Engineering Research in Pipelines (CERP),
University of Windsor,
Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
e-mail: ghaedni@uwindsor.ca

Sreekanta Das

Centre for Engineering Research in Pipelines (CERP),
University of Windsor,
Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
e-mail: sdas@uwindsor.ca

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received November 27, 2015; final manuscript received March 16, 2016; published online June 2, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Jonas W. Ringsberg.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 138(5), 051701 (Jun 02, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-15-1122; doi: 10.1115/1.4033181 History: Received November 27, 2015; Revised March 16, 2016

Steel pipes are used to build pipelines that carry gas and oil across a country or a continent. The majority of onshore pipelines run underground; hence, they are called buried pipelines. These buried pipelines must endure external interferences and complex loading that result from geotechnical causes, aggressive environments, and operational requirements. Many segments of an underground pipeline may rest on rock tips and other localized hard surfaces, resulting in concentrated reaction load acting on small area of the outer wall of the operating pipeline. As a result, permanent inward deformations in the pipe wall, known as dent defect, can form. In addition, a resulting cross-sectional irregularity, known as an ovalization defect, can also occur. Pipe ovalization defects are a concern of pipeline operating companies, as the defect may challenge a pipeline's operation and/or structural integrity and safety. This research was completed by the Centre of Engineering Research in Pipelines located at the University of Windsor to examine the effects that rock tip shape, operating (internal) pressure, and a pipe's diameter-to-thickness ratio (D/t) have on an NPS30 X70-grade pipe's ovalization defect when it is subjected to such a concentrated load. This article discusses the lab-based full-scale examinations, finite element analysis (FEA) simulations, results, and discussions.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Roovers, P. , Bood, R. , Gali, M. , Marewski, U. , Steiner, M. , and Zarea, M. , 2000, “ EPRG Methods for Assessing the Tolerance and Resistance of Pipelines to External Damage,” Pipeline Technol., 2, pp. 405–425.
Cosham, A. , and Hopkins, P. , 2004, “ The Effect of Dents in Pipelines-Guidance in the Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 81(2), pp. 127–139. [CrossRef]
Smith, R. B. , and Gideon, D. N. , 1979, “ Statistical Analysis of DOT-OPSO Data,” Annual Symposium—Society of Flight Test Engineers, pp. D.1–D.9.
Wang, K. C. , Smith, E. D. , Mineral, C. C. F. , and Program, E. T. E. R. , 1982, The Effect of Mechanical Damage on Fracture Initiation in Line Pipe: Dents, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, CANMET, Energy Research Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Zarea, M. F. , Toumbas, D. N. , Philibert, C. E. , and Deo, I. , 1996, “ Numerical Models for Static Denting and Dynamic Puncture of Gas Transmission Linepipe and Their Validation,” 1st International Pipeline Conference (IPC), pp. 777–784.
Lancaster, E. R. , 1996, “ Burst Pressures of Pipes Containing Dents and Gouges,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part E, 210(1), pp. 19–27. [CrossRef]
AER, 2013, “ Report 2013-B: Pipeline Performance in Alberta, 1990–2012,” Alberta Energy Regulator, Report No. 2013-B. Calgary, AB, Canada.
Bachut, J. , and Iflefel, I . B. , 2011, “ Analysis of Pipes Containing Plain and Gouged Dents,” Strain, 47(1), pp. e34–e51. [CrossRef]
Allouti, M. , Schmitt, C. , and Pluvinage, G. , 2014, “ Assessment of a Gouge and Dent Defect in a Pipeline by a Combined Criterion,” Eng. Failure Anal., 36, pp. 1–13. [CrossRef]
Ghaednia, H. , Das, S. , Wang, R. , and Kania, R. , 2015, “ Effect of Operating Pressure and Dent Depth on Burst Strength of NPS30 Linepipe With Dent–Crack Defect,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 137(3), p. 031402. [CrossRef]
Akbari Alashti, R. , Jafari, S. , and Hosseinipour, S. J. , 2015, “ Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Ductile Damage Effect on Load Bearing Capacity of a Dented API XB Pipe Subjected to Internal Pressure,” Eng. Failure Anal., 47, pp. 208–228. [CrossRef]
Hanif, W. , and Kenny, S. , 2014, “ Mechanical Damage and Fatigue Assessment of Dented Pipelines Using FEA,” 10th Biennial International Pipeline Conference (IPC), p. V002T06A052.
Allouti, M. , Schmitt, C. , Pluvinage, G. , Gilgert, J. , and Hariri, S. , 2012, “ Study of the Influence of Dent Depth on the Critical Pressure of Pipeline,” Eng. Failure Anal., 21, pp. 40–51. [CrossRef]
ASME, 2012, “ Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquids and Slurries,” ASME International, New York, Standard No. ASME B31.4.
ASME, 2014, “ Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems,” ASME International, New York, Standard No. ASME B31.8.
Yeh, M. K. , and Kyriakides, S. , 1986, “ On the Collapse of Inelastic Thick-Walled Tubes Under External Pressure,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 108(1), pp. 35–47. [CrossRef]
Yeh, M. K. , and Kyriakides, S. , 1988, “ Collapse of Deepwater Pipelines,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 110(1), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
CSA, 2015, “ Z662: Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems,” Canadian Standard Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
ISO, 2009, “ Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries—Pipeline Transportation Systems,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 13623.
DNV, 2012, “ Submarine Pipeline Systems,” Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, Norway, Standard No. OS-F101.
Bai, Y. , and Bai, Q. , 2005, Subsea Pipelines and Risers, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
API, 2012, Spec 5L: Specification for Line Pipe, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC.
ASTM, 2015, “ E8/E8M: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
SIMULIA, 2015, “ Analysis User's Manuals,” Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Rising Sun Mills, Providence, RI.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Strain gauge arrangements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Load-deformation behaviors: (a) specimens S1–S3 and S6 and (b) specimens S1, S4, and S5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Deformed and undeformed cross sections of a pipe specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Cross section distortion measured from various test specimens: (a) effect of internal pressure, (b) effect of plastic deformation, and (c) effect of LP size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Six LVDT's around the pipe: (a) schematic and (b) photo

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

FE model for half-pipe with meshing scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Stress–strain relationship for the material of the pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Photo of test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Two different LPs used to apply concentrate load: (a) short LP and (b) long LP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of a section of buried pipe resting on a rock tip

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

The relationship between dent depth and D/t: (a) square LP and (b) sphere LP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of load-deformation behavior for specimens S2 and S3: (a) specimen S2-SP-D4-P30 and (b) specimen S3-SP-D4-P60

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of cross section distortions for specimens S2 and S3: (a) specimen S2-SP-D4-P30 and (b) specimen S3-SP-D4-P60

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of strain distribution for specimens S2 and S3: (a) specimen S2-SP-D4-P30 and (b) specimen S3-SP-D4-P60

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Shapes of LPs utilized in the parametric study: (a) square LP and (b) spherical LP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Effect that D/t and operating pressure have on the maximum ovalization for the square LP: (a) displacement control method and (b) load control method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

The effect that D/t has on the maximum ovalization for a spherical LP: (a) displacement control method and (b) load control method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Effect that operating pressure has on the maximum ovalization for a spherical LP: (a) displacement control method and (b) load control method




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In