0
Research Papers: Offshore Geotechnics

Reliability Analysis of Piles in Multilayer Soil in Mooring Dolphin Structures

[+] Author and Article Information
Reda Farag

Department of Structures and
Metallic Construction,
Housing and Building Research Center,
Giza 11511, Egypt
e-mail: red_bordany@yahoo.com

Achintya Haldar

Department of Civil Engineering
and Engineering Mechanics,
The University of Arizona,
Tucson, AZ 85721
e-mail: haldar@u.arizona.edu

Mahmoud El-Meligy

Department of Structural Engineering,
Mansoura University,
Dakahlia 35516, Egypt
e-mail: eggroup_egypt@yahoo.com

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 12, 2015; final manuscript received May 5, 2016; published online June 3, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Kazuhiro Iijima.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 138(5), 052001 (Jun 03, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-15-1026; doi: 10.1115/1.4033578 History: Received March 12, 2015; Revised May 05, 2016

Reliability of complicated mooring dolphin structures (MDS) is estimated using few deterministic evaluations and an improved response surface method denoted as IRSM-second-order reliability method (SORM). It is a hybrid approach consisting of an IRSM, SORM, and several advanced factorial schemes. For this type of sophisticated analysis, simulation-based algorithm is impractical to implement. The concept is applied to estimate the risk of an existing MDS at the shore of Nile Delta. It is a large diameter steel-pile embedded in the sea bed. The Pile–Soil-System is represented by a nonlinear finite element model (NLFEM). In NLFEM, the steel pile is assumed to behave linearly under the considered working loads, but the soil is considered to behave nonlinearly. Moreover, the contact nonlinearity between the pile and the soil is taken into account. It is demonstrated that the reliability information on MDS can be extracted using tens of deterministic evaluations. It has been found that incorporation of the contact nonlinearity into analysis has no effect on the pile behavior. In the probabilistic analysis, the uncertainties in loading, material properties, and geometric details are taken into account. Both operational and structural limit states are considered. For the MDS considered in this study, it has been observed that the strength limit state (flexural) is more critical than the operational limit state (drift). The most important variables are the mooring loads, the radius and thickness of the pile, and the modulus of elasticity of steel.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

American Concrete Institute (ACI), 2002, “ Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary,” Farmington Hills, MI, Standard No. 318-02.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), 2005, Manual of Steel Construction: Load and Resistance Factor Design, AISC, Chicago, IL.
American Wood Council (AWC), 1996, The Load and Resistance Factor Design LRFD, AWC, Washington, DC.
Farag, R. , Haldar, A. , and El-Meligy, M. , 2014, “ An Improved Reliability Analysis Method for Mooring Dolphin Structures,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 136(3), p. 034501. [CrossRef]
British Standard, 1994, “ Maritime Structures: Part 4: Code of Practice for Design of Fendering and Mooring Systems,” British Standard Institute (BSI), Standard No. BS 6349-4, pp. 31–34.
Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF), 2007, Mooring Equipment Guidelines, OCIMF, UK, pp. 1–6.
British Standard, 2000, “ Maritime Structures: Part 1: Code of Practice for General Criteria,” British Standard Institute (BSI), Standard No. BS 6349-1, pp. 92–108.
British Standard, 1988, “ Code of Practice for Marine Structures: Part 2: Design of Quay Walls,” Jetties and Dolphins, British Standard Institute (BSI), Standard No. BS 6349-2, pp. 6–94.
Eyres, D. J. , 2001, Ship Construction, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK, pp. 10–13, Chap. 2.
Structural Research and Analysis Corporation (SRAC), 2000, “ COSMOSM FE Program,” SRAC, Santa Monica, CA.
Tandjiria, V. , Teh, C. I. , and Low, B. K. , 2000, “ Reliability Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles Using Response Surface Methods,” Struct. Safety, 22(4), pp. 335–355. [CrossRef]
Paikowsky, S. , Lu, Y. , and Gurbuz, A. , 2007, “Prediction and Reliability of Pipe Piles Response to Lateral Loading (Part of Contemporary Issues in Deep Foundations),” ASCE, Geo-Denver, New Peaks in Geotechnics, Denver, CO.
Chan, C. L. , and Low, B. K. , 2012, “ Sensitivity Analysis of Laterally Loaded Pile Involving Correlated Non-Normal Variables,” Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 6(2), pp. 163–169. [CrossRef]
Bauer, J. , Kozubal, J. , Puła, W. , and Wyjadłowski, M. , 2012, “ Application of HDMR Method to Reliability Assessment of a Single Pile Subjected to Lateral Load,” Stud. Geotech. Mech., 34(3), pp. 37–51.
Haldar, A. , and Mahadevan, S. , 2000, Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design, Wiley, New York, pp. 181–223.
Box, G. E. , Hunter, W. G. , and Hunter, J. S. , 1978, Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building, Wiley, New York, pp. 173–313.
Khuri, A. I. , and Cornell, J. A. , 1996, Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 93–120.
Bucher, C. G. , and Bourgund, U. , 1990, “ A Fast and Efficient Response Surface Approach for Structural Reliability Problems,” Struct. Safety, 7(1), pp. 57–66. [CrossRef]
Rajashekhar, M. R. , and Ellingwood, B. R. , 1993, “ A New Look at the Response Surface Approach for Reliability Analysis,” Struct. Safety, 12(3), pp. 205–220. [CrossRef]
Reliability Consulting Programs (RCP), 1991–2003, “ Component Reliability Program (COMREL),” Munich, Germany.
Haldar, A. , and Mahadevan, S. , 2000, Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis, Wiley, New York, pp. 146–195.
API, 2000, “ Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms-Working Stress Design,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, Standard No. RP 2A-WSD, pp. 38–44.
API, 1983, “ API Pipes ERW and Seamless Pipes,” Chye Hin Hardware PTE LTD., API Mechanical and Chemical Standard No. API 5L.
NBS, 1980, “ Development of a Probability Based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58: Building Code Requirements for Minimum Design Loads in Buildings and Other Structures (Special Publication 577),” U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Standard No. A58.
Bednar, H. H. , 1986, Pressure Vessel Design Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, Malabar, FL, pp. 80–177.
Joint Committe on Structural Safety (JCSS), 2006, “Probabilistic Model Code: Soil Properties.”
2006, “ARCADIS Specifications Book 3, Damietta Port-Marine Terminal Specifications,” pp. 7–15.
Castalia, 1991–2010, “ SARAGON FE Program,” Milan, Italy.
StatSoft, 1984-2012, “Statistica,” Statsoft Inc.
EUROCODE, 1991, “ Basis of Design and Actions,” European Committee for Standardization, Standard No. EN 1990:2002 (E).

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Typical mooring pattern and mooring loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Principal ship dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Steel-pipe-pile system, suggested FEs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The efficiency of different schemes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Profile of MD3/MD4, coast of Nile Delta

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Determination of soil domain of interest

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Drift, moment, and shear force of the steel pile

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In