0
Research Papers: Ocean Engineering

A Comparative Assessment of Simplified Models for Simulating Parametric Roll

[+] Author and Article Information
Abhilash S. Somayajula

Marine Dynamics Laboratory,
Department of Ocean Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: s.abhilash89@gmail.com

Jeffrey Falzarano

Professor
Marine Dynamics Laboratory,
Department of Ocean Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: jfalzarano@civil.tamu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 5, 2016; final manuscript received September 25, 2016; published online January 31, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Robert Seah.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 139(2), 021103 (Jan 31, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: OMAE-16-1035; doi: 10.1115/1.4034921 History: Received April 05, 2016; Revised September 25, 2016

The motion of a ship/offshore platform at sea is governed by a coupled set of nonlinear differential equations. In general, analytical solutions for such systems do not exist and recourse is taken to time-domain simulations to obtain numerical solutions. Each simulation is not only time consuming but also captures only a single realization of the many possible responses. In a design spiral when the concept design of a ship/platform is being iteratively changed, simulating multiple realizations for each interim design is impractical. An analytical approach is preferable as it provides the answer almost instantaneously and does not suffer from the drawback of requiring multiple realizations for statistical confidence. Analytical solutions only exist for simple systems, and hence, there is a need to simplify the nonlinear coupled differential equations into a simplified one degree-of-freedom (DOF) system. While simplified methods make the problem tenable, it is important to check that the system still reflects the dynamics of the complicated system. This paper systematically describes two of the popular simplified parametric roll models in the literature: Volterra GM and improved Grim effective wave (IGEW) roll models. A correction to the existing Volterra GM model described in current literature is proposed to more accurately capture the restoring forces. The simulated roll motion from each model is compared against a corresponding simulation from a nonlinear coupled time-domain simulation tool to check its veracity. Finally, the extent to which each of the models captures the nonlinear phenomenon accurately is discussed in detail.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Topics: Simulation , Waves , Ships , Hull
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Somayajula, A. , and Falzarano, J. , 2015, “ Large-Amplitude Time-Domain Simulation Tool for Marine and Offshore Motion Prediction,” Mar. Syst. Ocean Technol., 10(1), pp. 1–17.
Paulling, J. R. , 1961, “ The Transverse Stability of a Ship in a Longitudinal Seaway,” J. Ship Res., 4(4), pp. 37–49.
Neves, M. A. , and Rodriguez, C. , 2005, “ A Coupled Third Order Model of Roll Parametric Resonance,” Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Ocean and Coastal Resources—Volume 1: Vessels for Maritime Transportation, C. G. Soares, Y. Garbatov, and N. Fonseca , eds., Taylor and Francis Group Plc, London, pp. 243–253.
Neves, M. A. , and Rodríguez, C. A. , 2007, “ Influence of Non-Linearities on the Limits of Stability of Ships Rolling in Head Seas,” Ocean Eng., 34(11), pp. 1618–1630. [CrossRef]
Bulian, G. , 2006, “ Development of Analytical Nonlinear Models for Parametric Roll and Hydrostatic Restoring Variations in Regular and Irregular Waves,” Ph.D. thesis, Università degli studi di trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Spyrou, K. J. , Tigkas, I. , Scanferla, G. , and Gavriilidis, N. , 2005, “ Problems and Capabilities in the Assessment of Parametric Rolling,” 10th International Ship Stability Workshop, Vol. 4, pp. 47–55.
Spyrou, K. J. , Tigkas, I. , Scanferla, G. , Pallikaropoulos, N. , and Themelis, N. , 2008, “ Prediction Potential of the Parametric Rolling Behaviour of a Post-Panamax Containership,” Ocean Eng., 35(11–12), pp. 1235–1244. [CrossRef]
Moideen, H. , Falzarano, J. M. , and Sharma, S. , 2012, “ Parametric Roll of Container Ships in Head Waves,” Int. J. Ocean Syst. Eng., 2(4), pp. 239–255. [CrossRef]
Moideen, H. , Somayajula, A. , and Falzarano, J. M. , 2013, “ Parametric Roll of High Speed Ships in Regular Waves,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2013-11602.
Grim, O. , 1961, “ Beitrag zu dem Problem der Sicherheit des Schiffes im Seegang,” Schiff Hafen, 6, pp. 490–497.
Umeda, N. , Hashimoto, H. , and Vassalos, D. , 2004, “ Nonlinear Dynamics on Parametric Roll Resonance With Realistic Numerical Modelling,” Int. Shipbuild. Prog., 51(2), pp. 205–220.
Hashimoto, H. , and Umeda, N. , 2006, “ Experimental and Numerical Studies on Parametric Roll of a Post-Panamax Container Ship in Irregular Waves,” 9th International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Vol. 1, pp. 181–190.
Bulian, G. , Francescutto, A. , Umeda, N. , and Hashimoto, H. , 2008, “ Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics of Parametric Ship Rolling in Random Waves in the Light of Physical Model Experiments,” Ocean Eng., 35(17–18), pp. 1661–1675. [CrossRef]
Hashimoto, H. , Umeda, N. , Ogawa, Y. , Taguchi, H. , Iseki, T. , Bulian, G. , Ishida, S. , Toki, N. , and Matsuda, A. , 2008, “ Prediction Methods for Parametric Rolling With Forward Velocity and Their Validation—Final Report of SCAPE Committee (Part 2),” 6th Osaka Colloquium on Seakeeping and Stability of Ships, pp. 265–275.
Hua, J. , Wang, W. , and Chang, J. , 1999, “ A Representation of GM-Variation in Waves by the Volterra System,” J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 7(2), pp. 94–100.
Moideen, H. , Somayajula, A. , and Falzarano, J. M. J. , 2014, “ Application of Volterra Series Analysis for Parametric Rolling in Irregular Seas,” J. Ship Res., 58(2), pp. 97–105.
Somayajula, A. , Guha, A. , Falzarano, J. , Chun, H.-H. , and Jung, K. H. , 2014, “ Added Resistance and Parametric Roll Prediction as a Design Criteria for Energy Efficient Ships,” Int. J. Ocean Syst. Eng., 4(2), pp. 117–136. [CrossRef]
Somayajula, A. , and Falzarano, J. M. , 2014, “ Non-Linear Dynamics of Parametric Roll of Container Ship in Irregular Seas,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2014-24186.
Guha, A. , and Falzarano, J. , 2015, “ The Effect of Hull Emergence Angle on the Near Field Formulation of Added Resistance,” Ocean Eng., 105, pp. 10–24. [CrossRef]
Guha, A. , and Falzarano, J. M. , 2015, “ Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces and Motion of Ships With Steady Forward Speed,” Int. Shipbuild. Prog., 62(3–4), pp. 113–138.
Guha, A. , Somayajula, A. , and Falzarano, J. , 2016, “ Time Domain Simulation of Large Amplitude Motions in Shallow Water,” 21st SNAME Offshore Symposium, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Houston, TX.
Somayajula, A. , and Falzarano, J. M. , 2015, “ Validation of Volterra Series Approach for Modelling Parametric Rolling of Ships,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2015-41467.
Moideen, H. , 2010, “ Prediction of Parametric Roll of Ships in Regular and Irregular Sea,” Master's thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
France, W. , Levadou, M. , Treakle, T. W. , Paulling, J. R. , Michel, R. K. , and Moore, C. , 2003, “ An Investigation of Head-Sea Parametric Rolling and Its Influence on Container Lashing Systems,” Mar. Technol., 40(1), pp. 1–19.
Webster, W. , 1989, “ Motion in Regular Waves—Transverse Motions,” Principles of Naval Architecture, Vol. III, E. Lewis , ed., SNAME, Jersey City, NJ.
Somayajula, A. , and Falzarano, J. , “ Critical Assessment of Reverse-MISO Techniques for System Identification of Coupled Roll Motion of Ships,” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. (published online).
Somayajula, A. , and Falzarano, J. , 2016, “ Estimation of Roll Motion Parameters Using R-MISO System Identification Technique,” 26th International Offshore and Polar Engineering (ISOPE 2016) Conference, Rhodes, Greece, June 26–July 2, J. S. Chung, M. Muskulus, T. Kokkinis, and A. M. Wang , eds., International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE), Cupertino, CA, Vol. 3, pp. 568–574.
Himeno, Y. , 1981, “ Prediction of Ship Roll Damping—A State of the Art,” The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Technical Report No. 239.
Falzarano, J. , Somayajula, A. , and Seah, R. , 2015, “ An Overview of the Prediction Methods for Roll Damping of Ships,” Ocean Syst. Eng., 5(2), pp. 55–76. [CrossRef]
Roberts, J. , 1982, “ The Effect of Parametric Excitation on Ship Rolling Motion in Random Waves,” J. Ship Res., 26(4), pp. 246–253.
Bulian, G. , 2008, “ On an Improved Grim Effective Wave,” Ocean Eng., 35(17), pp. 1811–1825. [CrossRef]
Bulian, G. , 2005, “ Nonlinear Parametric Rolling in Regular Waves—A General Procedure for the Analytical Approximation of the GZ Curve and Its Use in Time Domain Simulations,” Ocean Eng., 32(3–4), pp. 309–330. [CrossRef]
Silva, S. R. E. , Soares, C. G. , Turk, A. , Prpic-Orsic, J. , and Uzunoglu, E. , 2010, “ Experimental Assessment of the Parametric Rolling on a C11 Class Containership,” HYDRALAB III Joint User Meeting.
Belenky, V. L. , Weems, K. M. , Lin, W.-m. , and Paulling, J. R. , 2011, “ Probabilistic Analysis of Roll Parametric Resonance in Head Seas,” Contemporary Ideas on Ship Stability and Capsizing in Waves, Vol. 97, M. Almeida Santos Neves, V. L. Belenky, J. O. Kat, K. Spyrou, and N. Umeda, eds., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 555–569.
Wheeler, J. D. , 1970, “ Method for Calculating Forces Produced by Irregular Waves,” J. Pet. Technol., 249, pp. 359–367. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Body plan of the C11 hull form

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Separation of C11 hull form into 200 two-dimensional strips

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Variation of G1(x) and G2(x) along the length for C11 hull form

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

First-order transfer function for GM variation for C11 hull form in 5 kn forward speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Plot of the second-order transfer function g1(ωm, ωn) for C11 hull form in 5 kn forward speed: (a) real part of g1(ωm, ωn) and (b) imaginary part of g1(ωm, ωn)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Plot of the second-order transfer function g2(ωm, ωn) for C11 hull form in 5 kn forward speed: (a) real part of g2(ωm, ωn) and (b) imaginary part of g2(ωm, ωn)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of Volterra first-order GM variation with simulated GM variation for C11 hull form in 5 kn forward speed subjected to an input wave realized from Bretschneider spectrum with significant wave height Hs = 3 m and modal period Tp = 14.1 s: (a) GM time series comparison and (b) power spectral density comparison of δGM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Square of IGEW transfer functions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of IGEW and Grim effective wave with actual wave elevation from Bretschneider spectrum with Hs = 3 m and Tp = 14.1 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of GM variation using IGEW with simulated GM variation for C11 hull form in 5 kn forward speed subjected to an input wave realized from Bretschneider spectrum with significant wave height Hs = 3 m and modal period Tp = 14.1 s: (a) GM time series comparison and (b) power spectral density comparison of δGM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

GZ variation calculation using IGEW: (a) GZ curve for a 4 m high regular wave, (b) quasi-static trim for a 4 m high regular wave, and (c) comparison of quasi-static trim with dynamic pitch for C11 hull form in 5 kn forward speed subjected to an input wave realized from Bretschneider spectrum with significant wave height Hs = 3 m and modal period Tp = 14.1 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of parametric roll amplitudes from SIMDYN simulations with experiments [33]: (a) H = 6 m, (b) H = 8 m, and (c) H = 10 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of roll time histories from simplified models with SIMDYN for C11 hull form in 5 kn forward speed subjected to the same input wave realized from Bretschneider spectrum with significant wave height Hs = 3 m and modal period Tp = 14.1 s: (a) wave elevation used in SIMDYN and 1DOF models, (b) Volterra model, (c) GM variation model using IGEW, and (d) GZ variation model using IGEW

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

SIMDYN simulation of parametric roll for C11 hull form in 5 kn forward speed subjected to regular wave (T = 14.1 s) with and without nonlinear Froude–Krylov force: (a) H = 2 m and (b) H = 3 m

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In