Research Papers: Ocean Engineering

Turbulence Characteristics of Flow Under Combined Wave–Current Motion

[+] Author and Article Information
Santosh Kumar Singh

Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Laboratory,
Department of Aerospace Engineering
and Applied Mechanics,
Indian Institute of Engineering
Science and Technology (IIEST),
Shibpur, Howrah 711103, India
e-mail: fmsks84@gmail.com

Koustuv Debnath

Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Laboratory,
Department of Aerospace Engineering
and Applied Mechanics,
Indian Institute of Engineering
Science and Technology (IIEST),
Shibpur, Howrah 711103, India
e-mail: debnath_koustuv@yahoo.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 4, 2016; final manuscript received October 15, 2016; published online January 31, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Celso P. Pesce.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 139(2), 021102 (Jan 31, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: OMAE-16-1001; doi: 10.1115/1.4035139 History: Received January 04, 2016; Revised October 15, 2016

This paper describes an experimental study carried out in a laboratory flume with a smooth surface to investigate the effect of a surface wave on unidirectional current. The measured velocity data were analyzed within the framework of the phase averaging for combined wave–current flow and verified by velocity equations based on the phase-averaged Prandtl momentum-transfer theory. The results highlight the changes induced on the mean velocity profile, turbulence intensity, and Reynolds shear stress in a plane of symmetry due to the superposition of surface waves of different frequencies. Modifications in the mean velocities, the turbulence intensities, and the Reynolds shear stresses with respect to the current-only flow are explored. As the frequency of the surface waves in unidirectional current changes, the results show variations in the mean flow and in the turbulence statistics that may affect the local sediment mobility in the coastal region.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Grant, W. D. , and Madsen, O. S. , 1979, “ Combine Wave and Current Interaction With Rough Bottom,” J. Geophys. Res., 84(4), pp. 1797–1808. [CrossRef]
Brevik, I. , 1981, “ Oscillatory Rough Turbulent Boundary Layers,” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 107(3), pp. 175–188.
Myrhaug, D. , 1982, “ On a Theoretical Model of Rough Turbulent Wave Boundary Layers,” Ocean Eng., 9(6), pp. 547–565. [CrossRef]
Christofferson, J. B. , and Jonsson, I. G. , 1985, “ Bed Friction and Dissipation in a Combined Current and Wave Motion,” Ocean Eng., 12(5), pp. 387–423. [CrossRef]
Myrhaug, D. , and Slaattelid, O. H. , 1989, “ Combined Wave and Current Boundary Layer Model for Fixed Rough Seabeds,” Ocean Eng., 16(2), pp. 119–142. [CrossRef]
Johnson, H. K. , Karambas, T. V. , Avgeris, I. , Zanuttigh, B. , and Caceres, D. G. M. I. , 2005, “ Modelling of Waves and Currents Around Submerged Break Waters,” Coastal Eng., 52(10–11), pp. 949–969. [CrossRef]
Zheng, J. , and Tang, Y. , 2009, “ Numerical Simulation of Spatial Lag Between Wave Breaking Point and Location of Maximum Wave-Induced Current,” China Ocean Eng., 23, pp. 59–71.
Zhang, C. , Zheng, J. , and Wang, Y. , 2011, “ Modeling Wave–Current Bottom Boundary Layers Beneath Shoaling and Breaking Wave,” Geo-Mar. Lett., 31(3), pp. 189–201. [CrossRef]
Teles, M. J. , Pires-Silva, A. A. , and Benoit, M. , 2013, “ Numerical Modelling of Wave Current Interactions at Local Scale,” Ocean Modell., 68, pp. 72–87. [CrossRef]
Zhang, J. S. , Zhang, Y. , Jeng, D. S. , Liu, P. L. F. , and Zhang, C. , 2014, “ Numerical Simulation of Wave–Current Interaction Using RANS Solver,” Ocean Eng., 75, pp. 157–164. [CrossRef]
Mathisen, P. P. , and Madsen, O. S. , 1996b, “ Waves and Currents Over a Fixed Rippled Bed: Bottom Roughness Experienced by Waves in the Presence of Waves,” J. Geophys. Res., 101(7), pp. 16543–16550. [CrossRef]
Brevik, I. , and Aas, B. , 1980, “ Flume Experiment on Waves and Currents: I. Rippled Bed,” Coastal Eng., 3, pp. 149–177. [CrossRef]
Brevik, I. , 1980, “ Flume Experiment on Waves and Currents: II. Smooth Bed,” Coastal Eng., 4, pp. 89–110. [CrossRef]
Kemp, P. H. , and Simons, R. R. , 1982, “ The Interaction of Waves and a Turbulent Current: Waves Propagating With the Current,” J. Fluid Mech., 116, pp. 227–250. [CrossRef]
Kemp, P. H. , and Simons, R. R. , 1983, “ The Interaction of Waves and a Turbulent Current: Waves Propagating Against the Current,” J. Fluid Mech., 130, pp. 73–89. [CrossRef]
Singh, S. K. , Debnath, K. , and Mazumder, B. S. , 2016, “ Change in Turbulent Flow Structure Over Rough Bed Under Combined Wave–Current Motion,” ISH J. Hydraul Eng., 33(3), pp. 305–313. [CrossRef]
Mazumder, B. S. , and Ojha, S. P. , 2007, “ Turbulence Statistics of Flow Due to Wave–Current Interaction,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 18(3–4), pp. 129–138. [CrossRef]
Umeyama, M. , 2005, “ Reynolds Stresses and Velocity Distributions in a Wave–Current Coexisting Environment,” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 131(5), pp. 203–212. [CrossRef]
Umeyama, M. , 2009, “ Changes in Turbulent Flow Structure Under Combined Wave–Current Motions,” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 135(5), pp. 213–227. [CrossRef]
Nikora, V. I. , and Goring, D. G. , 1998, “ ADV Measurements of Turbulence: Can We Improve Their Interpretation?” J. Hydraul. Eng., 124(6), pp. 630–634. [CrossRef]
McLelland, S. J. , and Nicholas, A. P. , 2000, “ A New Method for Evaluating Errors in High-Frequency ADV Measurements,” Hydrolog Process., 14(3), pp. 351–366. [CrossRef]
Wahl, T. L. , 2000, “ Analyzing ADV Data Using Win-ADV,” Building Partnerships, R. H. Hotchkiss and M. Glade , eds., Sec., ASCE 75, Reston, NY, Chap. 3.
Dean, R. G. , and Dalrymple, R. A. , 2000, Water Waves Mechanics for Engineers and Scientists, World-Scientific, Singapore, Chap. 4.
Mattioli, M. , Mancinelli, A. , and Brocchini, M. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation of the Wave-Induced Flow Around a Surface-Touching Cylinder,” J. Fluids Struct., 37, pp. 62–87. [CrossRef]
Nezu, I. , and Rodi, W. , 1986, “ Open-Channel Measurement With a Laser Doppler Anemometer,” J. Hydraul. Eng., 112(5), pp. 335–355. [CrossRef]
Debnath, K. , Manik, M. K. , and Mazumder, B. S. , 2012, “ Turbulence Statistic of Flow Over Scoured Cohesive Sediment Bed Around Circular Cylinder,” Adv. Water Resour., 41, pp. 18–28. [CrossRef]
Schlichting, H. , 2000, Boundary Layer Theory, 8th ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, Chap. 2.
Nezu, I. , and Nakagawa, H. , 1993, Turbulence in Open-Channel Flows, A. A., Balkema , ed., CRC Press, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Chap. 3.
Umeyama, M. , and Gerritsen, F. , 1992, “ Velocity Distribution in Uniform Sediment-Laden Flow,” J. Hydraul. Eng., 118(2), pp. 229–245. [CrossRef]
Singh, S. K. , Debnath, K. , and Mazumder, B. S. , 2015, “ Turbulence Statistics of Wave–Current Flow Over a Submerged Cube,” ASCE J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 142(3), pp. 1–20.
Barman, K. , Debnath, K. , and Mazumder, B. S. , 2016, “ Turbulence Between Two Inline Hemispherical Obstacles Under Wave–Current Interactions,” Adv. Water Resour., 88, pp. 32–52. [CrossRef]
Huang, Z. , and Mei, C. , 2003, “ Effects of Surface Waves on a Turbulent Current Over a Smooth or Rough Seabed,” J. Fluid Mech., 497, pp. 253–287. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the flume

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Plot of the normalized error for the mean flow at measurement section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Normalized profile of (a) streamwise and bottom-normal mean velocities (û and ŵ), (b) streamwise turbulence intensity (Iu), (c) bottom-normal turbulence intensity (Iw), and (d) Reynolds shear stress (τ̂) based on present measurements on a flat surface. Here, the parameters are Bu = 1.9, Bw = 0.98, Cu = 1.04, and Cw = 0.51.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Normalized streamwise mean velocity profiles for combined wave–current flow. (a)–(c) represents velocity profiles f = 0.6, 1.5, and 2.5 Hz, respectively. Velocity profile for current-only is also presented for reference and the solid line represents the profile calculated by using Eqs. 10 and 11.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Vertical profiles of turbulence intensities for wave–current flow along with current-only is also presented for reference; (a) phase-averaged streamwise turbulent intensity and (b) phase-averaged bottom-normal turbulent intensity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Calculated mean phase-averaged Reynolds stress [14,18] profile for wave–current flow along with current-only is also presented for reference

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Probability density function (PDF) of streamwise velocity component for both current only and wave-induced cases: (a) at z/h = 0.02, (b) at z/h = 0.10, and (c) at z/h = 0.6




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In