0
Research Papers: Structures and Safety Reliability

Criticality Analysis for Maintenance Purposes of Platform Supply Vessels in Remote Areas

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Marhaug

Department of Engineering and Safety,
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: andreasmarhaug@gmail.com

A. Barabadi

Department of Engineering and Safety,
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: abbas.b.abadi@uit.no

E. Stagrum

Leminkäinen Norge,
Tromsø 9020, Norway
e-mail: e_stagrum@hotmail.com

K. Karlsen

Fjellstrand AS,
Strandebarm 5630, Norway
e-mail: ketil.karlsen@hotmail.com

A. Olsen

NPRA Norway,
Tolvsrød 3150, Norway
e-mail: alfmolsen@gmail.com

Y. Z. Ayele

Department of Engineering and Safety,
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: yonas.z.ayele@uit.no

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 18, 2016; final manuscript received November 15, 2016; published online March 27, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Jonas W. Ringsberg.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 139(3), 031601 (Mar 27, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: OMAE-16-1117; doi: 10.1115/1.4035304 History: Received September 18, 2016; Revised November 15, 2016

The oil and gas industry is pushing toward new unexplored remote areas, potentially rich in resources but with limited industry presence, infrastructure, and emergency preparedness. Maintenance support is very important and challenging in such remote areas. A platform supply vessel (PSV) is an essential part of maintenance support. Hence, the acceptable level of its availability performance is high. Identification of critical components of the PSV provides essential information for optimizing maintenance management, defining a spare parts strategy, estimating competence needs for PSV operation, and achieving the acceptable level of availability performance. Currently, there are no standards or guidelines for the criticality analysis of PSVs for maintenance purposes. In this paper, a methodology for the identification of the critical components of PSVs has been developed, based on the available standard. It is a systematic screening process. The method considers functional redundancy and the consequences of loss of function as criticality criteria at the main and subfunction levels. Furthermore, at the component level, risk tools such as failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA), and fault tree analysis (FTA) will be applied in order to identify the most critical components. Moreover, the application of the proposed approach will be illustrated by a real case study.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Gao, X. , Barabady, J. , and Markeset, T. , 2010, “ An Approach for Prediction of Petroleum Production Facility Performance Considering Arctic Influence Factors,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 95(8), pp. 837–846. [CrossRef]
Barabadi, A. , Barabady, J. , and Markeset, T. , 2014, “ Application of Reliability Models With Covariates in Spare Part Prediction and Optimization–A Case Study,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 123, pp. 1–7. [CrossRef]
Kayrbekova, D. , Barabadi, A. , and Markeset, T. , 2011, “ Maintenance Cost Evaluation of a System to be Used in Arctic Conditions: A Case Study,” J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 17(4), pp. 320–336. [CrossRef]
Aas, B. , Halskau, Ø., Sr. , and Wallace, S. W. , 2009, “ The Role of Supply Vessels in Offshore Logistics,” Marit. Econ. Logist., 11(3), pp. 302–325. [CrossRef]
OffshoreBulletin, 2013, “ North Sea PSV Spot Market Continues to Return Healthy Day Rates,” Offshore Bulletin, Stavanger, Norway, last accessed June 20, 2016, https://offshorebulletin.wordpress.com/tag/day-rate/
NORSOK, 2001, Z-008: Criticality Analysis for Maintenance Purposes, Rev. 2., Norwegian Technology Centre, Lysaker, Norway.
Selvik, J. T. , and Aven, T. , 2011, “ A Framework for Reliability and Risk Centered Maintenance,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96(2), pp. 324–331. [CrossRef]
Rausand, M. , 1998, “ Reliability Centered Maintenance,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 60(2), pp. 121–132. [CrossRef]
de León Hijes, F. C. G. , and Cartagena, J. J. R. , 2006, “ Maintenance Strategy Based on a Multicriterion Classification of Equipments,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(4), pp. 444–451. [CrossRef]
MIL-STD-1629A, 1980, Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis, U.S. Department of Defense, Arlington, VA.
Ayele, Y. Z. , Barabadi, A. , and Barabady, J. , 2016, “ Dynamic Spare Parts Transportation Model for Arctic Production Facility,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage., 7(1), pp. 84–98. [CrossRef]
Stamatis, D. H. , 2003, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution, ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
Carot, V. , and Sanz, J. , 2000, “ Criticality and Sensitivity Analysis of the Components of a System,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 68(2), pp. 147–152. [CrossRef]
Boland, P. J. , and El-Neweihi, E. , 1995, “ Measures of Component Importance in Reliability Theory,” Comput. Oper. Res., 22(4), pp. 455–463. [CrossRef]
Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. , Rocco, C. M. , Gebre, B. A. , Coit, D. W. , and Tortorella, M. , 2006, “ New Insights on Multi-State Component Criticality and Importance,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(8), pp. 894–904. [CrossRef]
Boland, P. J. , El-Neweihi, E. , and Proschan, F. , 1992, “ Redundancy Importance and Allocation of Spares in Coherent Systems,” J. Stat. Plann. Inference, 29(1), pp. 55–65.
Wang, W. , Loman, J. , and Vassiliou, P. , 2004, “ Reliability Importance of Components in a Complex System,” Reliability and Maintainability, Annual Symposium-RAMS, IEEE, Jan. 26–29, pp. 6–11.
Borgonovo, E. , 2007, “ Differential, Criticality and Birnbaum Importance Measures: An Application to Basic Event, Groups and SSCs in Event Trees and Binary Decision Diagrams,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92(10), pp. 1458–1467. [CrossRef]
Kim, K. O. , Yang, Y. , and Zuo, M. J. , 2013, “ A New Reliability Allocation Weight for Reducing the Occurrence of Severe Failure Effects,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 117, pp. 81–88. [CrossRef]
Høyland, A. , and Rausand, M. , 2009, System Reliability Theory: Models and Statistical Methods, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Saadi, S. , Djebabra, M. , and Boubaker, L. , 2011, “ Proposal for a New Allocation Method of Environmental Goals Applied to an Algerian Cement Factory,” Manage. Environ. Qual. Int. J., 22(5), pp. 581–594. [CrossRef]
Carmignani, G. , 2009, “ An Integrated Structural Framework to Cost-Based FMECA: The Priority-Cost FMECA,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 94(4), pp. 861–871. [CrossRef]
Rosqvist, T. , and Tuominen, R. , 1999, “ Expert Judgment Models in Quantitative Risk Assessment,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, last accessed Feb. 12, 2015, http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollection-Store/_Public/31/016/31016454.pdf
Barabadi, A. , Gudmestad, R. , and Barabady, J. , 2015, “ RAMS Data Collection Under Arctic Conditions,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 135, pp. 92–99. [CrossRef]
Markeset, T. , 2008, “ Design for High Performance Assurance for Offshore Production Facilities in Remote Harsh and Sensitive Environments,” OPSEARCH, 45(3), p. 275.
Ayele, Y. Z. , Barabadi, A. , and Markeset, T. , 2013, “ Spare Part Transportation Management in High North,” International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions, Espoo, Finland.
Barabadi, A. , and Markeset, T. , 2011, “ Reliability and Maintainability Performance Under Arctic Conditions,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage., 2(3), pp. 205–217. [CrossRef]
Hora, S. C. , 2009, “ Expert Judgment in Risk Analysis,” Non-Published Research Reports, Paper No. 120, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Ayele, Y. Z. , Barabady, J. , and Droguett, E. L. , 2016, “ Dynamic Bayesian Network Based Risk Assessment for Arctic Offshore Drilling Waste Handling Practices,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct., 138(5), p. 051302. [CrossRef]
Ayele, Y. Z. , Barabadi, A. , and Droguett, E. L. , 2016, “ Risk-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Waste Handling Practices in the Arctic Drilling Operation,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct., 138(3), p. 031301. [CrossRef]
ISO, 2008, Petroleum, Petrochemical and Natural Gas Industries–Production Assurance and Reliability Management, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hokstad, P. , and Steiro, T. , 2006, “ Overall Strategy for Risk Evaluation and Priority Setting of Risk Regulations,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(1), pp. 100–111. [CrossRef]
Ådnanes, A. K. , 2003, Maritime Electrical Installations and Diesel Electric Propulsion, Vol. 4, ABB AS Marine, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 64–67.
Ortiz, N. , Wheeler, T. , Breeding, R. , Hora, S. , Meyer, M. , and Keeney, R. , 1991, “ Use of Expert Judgment in NUREG-1150,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 126(3), pp. 313–331. [CrossRef]
Chang, S. E. , McDaniels, T. , Fox, J. , Dhariwal, R. , and Longstaff, H. , 2014, “ Toward Disaster-Resilient Cities: Characterizing Resilience of Infrastructure Systems With Expert Judgments,” Risk Anal., 34(3), pp. 416–434. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cooke, R. M. , 1991, Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science, Oxford University Press, New York.
SFI Group System, 2002, “ A System for Classification of Technical and Economic Ship Information,” Inmarsat Group, London, UK, last accessed Jun. 6, 2015, http://www.engineeringmaintenance.info/cmmsasset-management-software-mainmenu-104/3474-sfi-group-system-a-system-for-classification-of-technical-and-economic-ship-information
Braglia, M. , 2000, “ MAFMA: Multi-Attribute Failure Mode Analysis,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 17(9), pp. 1017–1033. [CrossRef]
Bowles, J. B. , and Peláez, C. E. , 1995, “ Fuzzy Logic Prioritization of Failures in a System Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 50(2), pp. 203–213. [CrossRef]
OREDA, 2002, OREDA Offshore Reliability Data Handbook, DNV, Oslo, Norway.
OREDA, 2009, “ OREDA Handbook,” Topside Equipment, Vol. 1, OREDA, Oslo, Norway.
Panesar, S. S. , Kumar, R. , and Markeset, T. , 2008, “ Development of Maintenance Strategies for Offshore Production Facilities,” 3rd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and Intelligent Maintenance Systems (WCEAM-IMS 2008), Beijing, China, Oct. 28–30, pp. 1227–1232.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Identification of critical components: A systematic flowchart

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Oil and gas licenses in the West Greenland exploration blocks (see figure in color online)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Vessel layout with case-relevant systems highlighted and (b) Tromsø Caster managed by Troms Offshore

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Subfunction 3 (energy to water) FTA

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In