0
Research Papers: Offshore Technology

Benchmarking of a Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Numerical Wave Tank for Studying Wave Load Effects on Fixed and Floating Offshore Structures

[+] Author and Article Information
Ali Nematbakhsh

Mem. ASME
Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures,
Department of Marine Technology,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology,
Trondheim NO-7491, Norway
e-mail: ali.nematbakhsh@ntnu.no

Zhen Gao

Professor
Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures;
Centre for Autonomous Marine
Operations and Systems,
Department of Marine Technology,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Trondheim NO-7491, Norway
e-mail: zhen.gao@ntnu.no

Torgeir Moan

Professor
Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures;
Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations
and Systems,
Department of Marine Technology,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology,
Trondheim NO-7491, Norway
e-mail: torgeir.moan@ntnu.no

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 14, 2016; final manuscript received November 25, 2016; published online April 5, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Yi-Hsiang Yu.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 139(3), 031301 (Apr 05, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: OMAE-16-1027; doi: 10.1115/1.4035475 History: Received March 14, 2016; Revised November 25, 2016

Abstract

A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based numerical wave tank (NWT) is developed and verified to study wave load effects on fixed and free floating offshore structures. The model is based on solving Navier–Stokes equations on a structured grid, level set method for tracking the free surface, and an immersed boundary method for studying wave–structure interaction. This paper deals with establishing and verifying a CFD-based NWT. Various concerns that arise during this establishment are discussed, namely effects of wave reflection which might affect the structure response, damping of waves in downstream, and three-dimensional (3D) effects of the waves. A method is described and verified to predict the time when incoming waves from wave generator are affected by reflecting waves from the structure which can help in better designing the dimensions of NWT. The model is then used to study sway, heave, and roll responses of a floating barge which is nonuniform in density and limited in sway direction by a spring and damper. Also, it is used to study wave loads on a fixed, large diameter, surface piercing circular cylinder. The numerical results are compared with the experimental and other numerical results, and in general very good agreement is observed in all range of studied wave frequencies. It is shown that for the studied fixed cylinder, the Morison equation leads to promising results for wavelength to diameter ratio larger than $2π$ (kD < 1), while for shorter wavelengths results in considerable over prediction of wave loads, due to simplification of wave diffraction effects.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ohyama, T. , and Nadaoka, K. , 1991, “ Development of a Numerical Wave Tank for Analysis of Nonlinear and Irregular Wave Field,” Fluid Dyn. Res., 8(5), pp. 231–251.
Boo, S. Y. , Kim, C. H. , and Kim, M. H. , 1994, “ A Numerical Wave Tank for Nonlinear Irregular Waves by 3-D Higher Order Boundary Element Method,” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 4(4), pp. 265–272.
Tanizawa, K. , and Naito, S. , 1998, “ A Study of Parametric Roll Motions by Fully Nonlinear Numerical Wave Tank,” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 8(4), pp. 251–257.
Buchmann, B. , Skourup, J. , and Cheung, K. F. , 1998, “ Run-Up on a Structure Due to Second-Order Waves and a Current in a Numerical Wave Tank,” Appl. Ocean Res., 20(5), pp. 297–308.
Boo, S. , 2002, “ Linear and Nonlinear Irregular Waves and Forces in a Numerical Wave Tank,” Ocean Eng., 29(5), pp. 475–493.
Falnes, J. , 2002, “ Optimum Control of Oscillation of Wave-Energy Converters,” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 12(2), pp. 147–155.
Babarit, A. , Hals, J. , Muliawan, M. , Kurniawan, A. , Moan, T. , and Krokstad, J. , 2012, “ Numerical Benchmarking Study of a Selection of Wave Energy Converters,” Renewable Energy, 41, pp. 44–63.
Nematbakhsh, A. , Michailides, C. , Gao, Z. , and Moan, T. , 2015, “ Comparison of Experimental Data of a Moored Multibody Wave Energy Device With a Hybrid CFD and BIEM Numerical Analysis Framework,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2015-41732.
Bachynski, E. E. , and Moan, T. , 2014, “ Ringing Loads on Tension Leg Platform Wind Turbines,” Ocean Eng., 84, pp. 237–248.
Chan, G. K. , Sclavounos, P. D. , Jonkman, J. , and Hayman, G. , 2015, “ Computation of Nonlinear Hydrodynamic Loads on Floating Wind Turbines Using Fluid-Impulse Theory,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2015-41053.
Ghasemi, A. , Olinger, D. J. , and Tryggvason, G. , 2015, “ Computational Simulation of Tethered Undersea Kites for Power Generation,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2015-50809.
Schloer, S. , Paulsen, B. T. , and Bredmose, H. , 2014, “ Application of CFD Based Wave Loads in Aeroelastic Calculations,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2014-24684.
Bokmann, A. , Pakozdi, C. , Kristiansen, T. , Hyunchul, J. , and Kim, J. , 2014, “ An Experimental and Computational Development of a Benchmark Solution for the Validation of Numerical Wave Tanks,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2014-24710.
Ren, N. , Li, Y. , and Ou, J. , 2014, “ Coupled Wind-Wave Time Domain Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Method,” J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 6(2), p. 023106.
Liou, M. S. , and Kao, K. H. , 1994, “ Progress in Grid Generation: From Chimera to DRAGON Grids,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No. NASA-TM-106709.
Ferziger, J. H. , and Peric, M. , 2012, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd ed., Springer Science and Business Media, New York, Chap. 2, pp. 25–31.
Yang, J. , and Stern, F. , 2009, “ Sharp Interface Immersed-Boundary/Level-Set Method for Wave-Body Interactions,” J. Comput. Phys., 228(17), pp. 6590–6616.
Kim, J. W. , Jang, H. , Kyoung, J. , Baquet, A. , and O'Sullivan, J. , 2015, “ CFD-Based Numerical Wave Basin for Offshore Floater Design,” Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Paper No. OTC-26060-MS.
Mittal, R. , and Iaccarino, G. , 2005, “ Immersed Boundary Methods,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 37(1), pp. 239–261.
Peskin, C. S. , 2002, “ The Immersed Boundary Method,” Acta Numerica, 11, pp. 479–517.
Mittal, R. , Dong, H. , Bozkurttas, M. , Najjar, F. , Vargas, A. , and Von Loebbecke, A. , 2008, “ A Versatile Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary Method for Incompressible Flows With Complex Boundaries,” J. Comput. Phys., 227(10), pp. 4825–4852. [PubMed]
Seo, J. H. , and Mittal, R. , 2011, “ A Sharp-Interface Immersed Boundary Method With Improved Mass Conservation and Reduced Spurious Pressure Oscillations,” J. Comput. Phys., 230(19), pp. 7347–7363. [PubMed]
Park, J. C. , Kim, M. H. , and Miyata, H. , 1999, “ Fully Non-Linear Free-Surface Simulations by a 3D Viscous Numerical Wave Tank,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 29(6), pp. 685–703.
Bihs, H. , and Ong, M. C. , 2013, “ Numerical Simulation of Flows Past Partially-Submerged Horizontal Circular Cylinders in Free Surface Waves,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2013-10529.
Hu, C. , and Kashiwagi, M. , 2004, “ A CIP-Based Method for Numerical Simulations of Violent Free-Surface Flows,” J. Mar. Sci. Tech., 9(4), pp. 143–157.
Zhao, X. , and Hu, C. , 2012, “ Numerical and Experimental Study on a 2D Floating Body Under Extreme Wave Conditions,” Appl. Ocean Res., 35, pp. 1–13.
Yabe, T. , Xiao, F. , and Utsumi, T. , 2001, “ The Constrained Interpolation Profile Method for Multiphase Analysis,” J. Comput. Phys., 169(2), pp. 556–593.
Peng, W. , Lee, K. H. , Shin, S. H. , and Mizutani, N. , 2013, “ Numerical Simulation of Interactions Between Water Waves and Inclined-Moored Submerged Floating Breakwaters,” Coast. Eng., 82, pp. 76–87.
Nematbakhsh, A. , Olinger, D. J. , and Tryggvason, G. , 2013, “ A Nonlinear Computational Model for Floating Wind Turbines,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 135(12), p. 121103.
Nematbakhsh, A. , Olinger, D. J. , and Tryggvason, G. , 2014, “ Nonlinear Simulation of a Spar Buoy Floating Wind Turbine Under Extreme Ocean Conditions,” J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 6(3), p. 033121.
Nematbakhsh, A. , Bachynski, E. E. , Gao, Z. , and Moan, T. , 2014, “ Comparison of Wave-Induced Response of a TLP Wind Turbine Obtained by CFD Method and Potential Theory,” 24th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Busan, Korea, June 15–20, Paper No. ISOPE-I-14-064.
Nematbakhsh, A. , Bachynski, E. E. , Gao, Z. , and Moan, T. , 2015, “ Comparison of Wave Load Effects on a TLP Wind Turbine by Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Potential Flow Theory Approaches,” Appl. Ocean Res., 53, pp. 142–154.
Sarpkaya, T. , 1986, “ Force on a Circular Cylinder in Viscous Oscillatory Flow at Low Keulegan–Carpenter Numbers,” J. Fluid Mech., 165, pp. 61–71.
Guilmineau, E. , and Queutey, P. , 2002, “ A Numerical Simulation of Vortex Shedding From an Oscillating Circular Cylinder,” J. Fluid Struct., 16(6), pp. 773–794.
Osher, S. , and Fedkiw, R. , 2003, Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces, Springer Science and Business Media, New York.
Iaccarino, G. , and Verzicco, R. , 2003, “ Immersed Boundary Technique for Turbulent Flow Simulations,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 56(3), pp. 331–347.
Lai, M. C. , and Peskin, C. S. , 2000, “ An Immersed Boundary Method With Formal Second-Order Accuracy and Reduced Numerical Viscosity,” J. Comput. Phys., 160(2), pp. 705–719.
Curet, O. M. , AlAli, I. K. , MacIver, M. A. , and Patankar, N. A. , 2010, “ A Versatile Implicit Iterative Approach for Fully Resolved Simulation of Self-Propulsion,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 199(37), pp. 2417–2424.
Nojiri, N. , and Murayama, K. , 1975, “ A Study on the Drift Force on Two-Dimensional Floating Body in Regular Waves,” Trans. West-Jpn. Soc. Nav. Arch., 51, pp. 131–152.
Koo, W. , and Kim, M. H. , 2004, “ Freely Floating-Body Simulation by a 2D Fully Nonlinear Numerical Wave Tank,” Ocean Eng., 31(16), pp. 2011–2046.
Tanizawa, K. , Minami, M. , and Naito, S. , 1999, “ Estimation of Wave Drift Force by Numerical Wave Tank,” 9th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Brest, France, May 30–June 4, Paper No. ISOPE-I-99-274.
Newman, J. N. , 1977, Marine Hydrodynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Chap. 6, pp. 257–260.
Bardestani, M. , and Faltinsen, O. M. , 2013, “ A Two-Dimensional Approximation of a Floating Fish Farm in Waves and Current With the Effect of Snap Loads,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2013-10487.
Fenton, J. , 1985, “ A Fifth-Order Stokes Theory for Steady Waves,” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng., 111(2), pp. 216–234.
Lamb, H. , 1932, Hydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Stern, F. , Bhushan, S. , Carrica, P. , and Yang, J. , 2010, “ Large Scale Parallel Computing and Scalability Study for Surface Combatant Static Maneuver and Straight Ahead Conditions Using CFDShip-Iowa,” Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics: Recent Advances and Future Directions, R. Biswas , ed., DEStech Publications, Lancaster, PA, pp. 79–94.
Hogben, N. , and Standing, R. , 1975, “ Experience in Computing Wave Loads on Large Bodies,” Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 5–8, Paper No. OTC-2189-MS.
Lee, C. H. , 1995, “ WAMIT Theory Manual,” Department of Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Report No. 95-2.
Bachynski, E. E. , and Ormberg, H. , 2015, “ Hydrodynamic Modeling of Large-Diameter Bottom-Fixed Offshore Wind Turbines,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2015-42028.
Robertson, A. , Wendt, F. , Jonkman, J. , Popko, W. , Vorpahl, F. , Stansberg, C. T. , Bachynski, E. E. , Bayati, I. , Beyer, F. , de Vaal, J. B. , Harries, R. , Yamaguchi, A. , Shin, H. , Kim, B. , Zee, T. V. , Bozonnet, P. , Aguilo, B. , Bergua, R. , Qvist, J. , Qijun, W. , Chen, X. , Guerinel, M. , Tu, Y. , Yutong, H. , Li, R. , and Bouy, L. , 2015, “ OC5 Project Phase I: Validation of Hydrodynamic Loading on a Fixed Cylinder,” 25th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Kona, HI, June 21–26, Paper No. ISOPE-I-15-116.
Morison, J. , Johnson, J. , and Schaaf, S. , 1950, “ The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles,” J. Pet. Tech., 2(5), pp. 149–154.
Faltinsen, O. M. , 1990, Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, Chap. 1, pp. 10–12.
Gallardo, J. P. , Andersson, H. I. , and Pettersen, B. , 2014, “ Turbulent Wake Behind a Curved Circular Cylinder,” J. Fluid Mech., 742, pp. 192–229.
Majumdar, S. , Iaccarino, G. , and Durbin, P. , 2001, “ RANS Solvers With Adaptive Structured Boundary Non-Conforming Grids,” Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, pp. 353–366.
Tseng, Y. H. , and Ferziger, J. H. , 2003, “ A Ghost-Cell Immersed Boundary Method for Flow in Complex Geometry,” J. Comput. Phys., 192(2), pp. 593–623.
Lohner, R. , Appanaboyina, S. , and Cebral, J. R. , 2008, “ Comparison of Body-Fitted, Embedded and Immersed Solutions of Low Reynolds-Number 3-D Incompressible Flows,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 57(1), pp. 13–30.
Verzicco, R. , Mohd-Yusof, J. , Orlandi, P. , and Haworth, D. , 2000, “ Large Eddy Simulation in Complex Geometric Configurations Using Boundary Body Forces,” AIAA J., 38(3), pp. 427–433.

Figures

Fig. 1

Sketch of the numerical wave tank used to study the barge response. The barge is hinged at the center of gravity, allowing to have roll motion in addition to sway and heave. λ is the wavelength.

Fig. 2

Wave amplitude measured at the wave generator for kB/2=0.61. Distorted waves after 53 s due to the re-reflected waves can be seen.

Fig. 3

Interaction of the barge with relatively short length waves (kB/2=0.61). The wave is traveling from left to the right side of the barge: (a) t=55.25 s and (b) t=55.75 s.

Fig. 4

Sway motion of the barge for kB/2=0.61. The sway motion is normalized by the barge breadth (B).

Fig. 5

Heave motion of the barge for kB/2=0.61. The heave response is normalized by the barge breadth (B).

Fig. 6

Roll motion of the barge for kB/2=0.61. A mean negative roll angle is observed.

Fig. 7

Sway (a), heave (b), and roll (c) RAOs of a 2D model of floating barge. Experimental data are derived from Ref. [39] and linear frequency domain results are calculated in Ref. [40]. θ is measured in radians.

Fig. 8

Sway, heave, and roll responses, and zoomed in view plot of the responses at the barge's roll natural frequency (kB/2=0.5)

Fig. 9

Sketch of the numerical wave tank used to study wave loads on a surface-piercing fixed cylinder. In all the simulations, water depth is 2.5 m, and the cylinder diameter is 1 m, corresponding to model scale test [47].

Fig. 10

Wave amplitude measured two wavelengths upstream of the cylinder at two locations as shown in Fig. 9

Fig. 11

One frame of numerical simulation for ka = 0.5 at t = 39.5 s. The zoomed view includes cross section of numerical grid points. 216×100×150 number of grid points in x, y, and z directions are used for numerical simulation.

Fig. 12

Time domain horizontal wave forces and bending moments on fixed circular cylinder. The moment is calculated with respect to the bottom of the cylinder.

Fig. 13

Comparing the CFD results for the wave-induced forces and bending moments at the bottom of fixed surface piercing cylinder, with the experimental data and potential flow theory-based results. “WAMIT,” “CFD model,” and “Morison Eq.” are calculated in the current research. “Exp” and “Potential Flow Theory” results were obtained by Ref. [47].

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related Proceedings Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

• TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
• EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In