Research Papers: Offshore Geotechnics

Elastoplastic Simulation of Stress–Strain Response Considering the Cyclic Degradation of Saturated Clay

[+] Author and Article Information
Haihui Yao

State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering
Simulation and Safety,
Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China
e-mail: yaohaihui05@163.com

Jianhua Wang

State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering
Simulation and Safety,
Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China
e-mail: tdwjh@tju.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received May 15, 2017; final manuscript received February 10, 2018; published online April 19, 2018. Assoc. Editor: David R. Fuhrman.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 140(4), 042002 (Apr 19, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-17-1076; doi: 10.1115/1.4039522 History: Received May 15, 2017; Revised February 10, 2018

A modified anisotropic bounding surface model is developed to simulate the stress–strain response of saturated clay under cyclic loading. In this study, kinematic hardening variables are introduced into the equation for a rotational bounding surface, and an anisotropic bounding surface equation is established by strict mathematical derivation from the isotropic and kinematic hardening rules. To characterize the cyclic degeneration behavior of soil stiffness, the accumulated deviatoric plastic strain is incorporated into the plastic modulus interpolation function. This modified model is then validated by comparison to results of undrained cyclic triaxial tests of isotropic and anisotropic consolidated clay samples from the literature. The results show that the performance of the modified model is an improvement over the original model for simulating the hysteresis, accumulation, and cyclic degeneration of stress–strain response.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hyodo, M. , Yamamoto, Y. , and Sugiyama, M. , 1994, “ Undrained Cyclic Shear Behaviour of Normally Consolidated Clay Subjected to Initial Static Shear Stress,” Soils Found., 34(4), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Moses, G. G. , and Rao, S. N. , 2007, “ Behavior of Marine Clay Subjected to Cyclic Loading With Sustained Shear Stress,” Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol., 25(2), pp. 81–96. [CrossRef]
Hu, L. M. , Ding, J. W. , and Liu, H. X. , 2010, “ Mechanical Behavior of Marine Clay Under Wave Loading,” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 20(1), pp. 72–79.
Zdravković, L. , Potts, D. M. , and Hight, D. W. , 2002, “ The Effect of Strength Anisotropy on the Behaviour of Embankments on Soft Ground,” Geotechnique, 52(6), pp. 447–457. [CrossRef]
Mrǒz, Z. , Norris, V. A. , and Ienkiewicz, O. C. , 1981, “ An Anisotropic, Critical State Model for Soils Subject to Cyclic Loading,” Geotechnique, 31(4), pp. 451–469. [CrossRef]
Li, T. , and Meissner, H. , 2002, “ Two-Surface Plasticity Model for Cyclic Undrained Behavior of Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 128(7), pp. 613–626. [CrossRef]
Liang, R. Y. , and Ma, F. , 1992, “ Anisotropic Plasticity Model for Undrained Cyclic Behavior of Clays. I: Theory,” J. Geotech. Eng., 118(2), pp. 229–245. [CrossRef]
Liang, R. Y. , and Ma, F. , 1992, “ Anisotropic Plasticity Model for Undrained Cyclic Behavior of Clays. II: Verification,” J. Geotech. Eng., 118(2), pp. 246–265. [CrossRef]
Seidalinov, G. , and Taiebat, M. , 2014, “ Bounding Surface SANICLAY Plasticity for Cyclic Clay Behavior,” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 38(7), pp. 702–724. [CrossRef]
Hu, C. , Liu, H. X. , and Huang, W. , 2012, “ Anisotropic Bounding-Surface Plasticity Model for the Cyclic Shakedown and Degradation of Saturated Clay,” Comput. Geotech., 44(3), pp. 34–47. [CrossRef]
Hu, C. , Liu, H. X. , and Huang, W. , 2012, “ Damage-Dependent Bounding Surface Model for Cyclic Degradation of Saturated Clay,” Rock Soil Mech., 33(2), pp. 459–466.
Hu, C. , and Liu, H. X. , 2014, “ Implicit and Explicit Integration Schemes in the Anisotropic Bounding Surface Plasticity Model for Cyclic Behaviours of Saturated Clay,” Comput. Geotech., 55(1), pp. 27–41. [CrossRef]
Dafalias, Y. F. , 1986, “ An Anisotropic Critical State Clay Plasticity Model,” Mech. Res. Commun., 13(6), pp. 341–347. [CrossRef]
Crouch, R. S. , and Wolf, J. P. , 1995, “ On a Three-Dimensional Anisotropic Plasticity Model for Soil,” Géotechnique, 45(2), pp. 301–305. [CrossRef]
Ling, H. I. , Yue, D. , Kaliakin, V. N. , and Themelis, N. J. , 2002, “ Anisotropic Elastoplastic Bounding Surface Model for Cohesive Soils,” J. Eng. Mech., 128(7), pp. 748–758. [CrossRef]
Masing, G. , 1926, “ Eigenspannungen and Verfestigung Beim Messing,” Second International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Zurich, Switzerland, Sept. 12–17, pp. 332–335.
Jiang, W. , 1994, “ New Kinematic Hardening Model,” J. Eng. Mech., 120(10), pp. 2201–2222. [CrossRef]
Dafalias, Y. F. , 1986, “ Bounding Surface Plasticity. I: Mathematical Foundation and Hypoplasticity,” J. Eng. Mech., 112(9), pp. 966–987. [CrossRef]
Roscoe, K. H. , and Burland, J. B. , 1968, “ On the Generalized Stress-Strain Behavior of ‘Wet’ Clay,” Engineering Plasticity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 535–609.
Huang, M. , Liu, Y. , and Sheng, D. , 2011, “ Simulation of Yielding and Stress–Stain Behavior of Shanghai Soft Clay,” Comput. Geotech., 38(3), pp. 341–353. [CrossRef]
Dafalias, Y. F. , and Herrmann, L. R. , 1986, “ Bounding Surface Plasticity. II: Application to Isotropic Cohesive Soil,” J. Eng. Mech., 112(12), pp. 1263–1291. [CrossRef]
Sangrey, D. A. , Henkel, D. J. , and Esrig, M. I. , 1969, “ The Effective Stress Response of a Saturated Clay Soil to Repeated Loading,” Can. Geotech. J., 6(3), pp. 241–252. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometric relationship of the bounding surface in the pq plane: (a) m = 0 and (b) m ≠ 0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Hardening rules and evolution of the bounding surface: (a) initial loading and (b) subsequent loading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Illustration of the radial mapping rule

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effect of the degeneration parameter β: (a) stress–strain curve for β = 0, (b) stress–strain curve for β = 5, (c) stress–strain curve in the first three cycles, and (d) secant shear modulus Gsec versus β

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Secant modulus for the unloading–reloading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of parameter ζr

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of parameter η

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the predicted and measured stress–strain relations for Newfield clay

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of the predicted and measured pore pressures for Kaolin clay with OCR = 5.1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the predicted and experimental stress–strain relations for Itsukaichi clay with k0 = 1.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of the simulated and experimental stress–strain relations for Itsukaichi clay with k0 = 0.57




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In