0
Research Papers: Structures and Safety Reliability

An Analytical Structural Strain Method for Steel Umbilical in Low Cycle Fatigue

[+] Author and Article Information
Wei Wang

College of Shipbuilding Engineering,
Harbin Engineering University,
Harbin 150001, China
e-mail: mimal@126.com

Xianjun Pei

Department of Naval Architecture
and Marine Engineering,
University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: xpei@umich.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 9, 2018; final manuscript received June 26, 2018; published online August 13, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Jonas W. Ringsberg.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 141(1), 011605 (Aug 13, 2018) (8 pages) Paper No: OMAE-18-1037; doi: 10.1115/1.4040721 History: Received April 09, 2018; Revised June 26, 2018

Pipes, especially risers, pipelines, and umbilicals, are extensively used in the subsea production system. Umbilical, as a controlling component of subsea production system, as well as other pipes, will resist reeling, unreeling, and additional processing before on-site installation, which might lead to yielding and plastic deformation of the pipe. This plastic deformation often results in low cycle fatigue (LCF) issue of the pipes, and how to effectively estimate the corresponding fatigue life has become a topic of practical engineering interest. In the present paper, a structural strain method is applied to determine the elastic core of the pipe and to calculate the pseudo structural stress. The pseudo structural stress concept has been applied to analyze the pipe in LCF regime. Further, the results obtained have been compared with the experimental and other available data. It can be seen that the results coincide well with the experimental data. In addition to the demonstrated effectiveness, the key advantage of this pseudo structural stress approach is the simplicity in dealing with girth-welded pipe sections, since finite element stress analysis is unnecessary.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Knapp, R. H. , and Chiu, E. Y. C. , 1998, “Tension Fatigue Model for Helically Wound Cable,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 110(1), pp. 12–18. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. , and Karr, D. G. , 2017, “Determining Ice Pressure Distribution on a Stiffened Panel Using Orthotropic Plate Inverse Theory,” J. Struct. Eng., 143(5), pp. 1–19. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001716
ASME, 2007, “Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sec VIII Div 2,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Dong, P. , Hong, J. K. , Osage, D. A. , Dewees, D. J. , and Prager, M. , 2010, “The Master S-N Curve Method: An Implementation in 2007 ASME Div 2 International Code for Boilers and Pressure Vessels,” Welding Research Council, New York, Bulletin No. 523.
Dong, P. , and Hong, J. K. , 2012, “Fatigue Tubul Joints: Hot Spot Stress Method Revisited,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 134(3), p. 031602. [CrossRef]
Dong, P. , 2001, “A Structural Stress Definition and Numerical Implementation for Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Joints,” Int. J. Fatigue, 23(10), pp. 865–876. [CrossRef]
Nie, C. , and Dong, P. , 2012, “A Traction Stress Based Shear Strength Definition for Fillet Welds,” Int. J. Strain Anal., 47(8), pp. 562–575. [CrossRef]
Healy, B. E. , 2004, “A Case Study Comparison of Surface Extrapolation and Battelle Structural Stress Methodologies,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2004-51228.
Kyuba, H. , and Dong, P. , 2005, “Equilibrium-Equivalent Structural Stress Approach to Fatigue Analysis of a Rectangular Hollow Section Joint,” Int. J. Fatigue, 27(1), pp. 85–94. [CrossRef]
Dong, P. , 2005, “A Robust Structural Stress Method for Fatigue Analysis of Offshore/Marine Structures,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 127(1), pp. 68–74. [CrossRef]
Dong, P. , and Yang, X. , 2010, “A Master S-N Curve Representation of Subsea Umbilical Tube Weld Fatigue Data,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2010-20789.
Markl, A. R. C. , 1947, “Fatigue Tests of Welding Elbows and Comparable Double-Mitre Bends,” Trans. ASME, 69(8), pp. 869–879.
Markl, A. R. C. , and Louisville, K. Y. , 1952, “Fatigue Tests of Piping Components,” Trans. ASME, 74(3), pp. 287–303.
Scavuzzo, R. J. , Srivatsan, T. S. , and Lam, P. C. , 1998, “Fatigue of Butt-Welded Pipe and Effect of Testing Methods,” WRC Bulletin No. 433.
Dong, P. , Pei, X. , Xing, S. , and Kim, M. H. , 2014, “A Structural Strain Method for Low-Cycle Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Components,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 119, pp. 39–51. [CrossRef]
Hinnant, C. , and Paulin, T. , 2008, “Experimental Evaluation of the Markl Fatigue Methods and ASME Piping Stress Intensification Factors,” ASME Paper No. PVP2014-28268.
Dong, P. , Hong, J. K. , and Jesus, A. M. P. , 2007, “Analysis of Recent Fatigue Data Using the Structural Stress Procedure in ASME Div 2 Rewrite,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 129(3), pp. 355–362. [CrossRef]
ASME, 2007, “The 2007 ASME Sec. VIII Div 2 Code: Design by Analysis,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Dong, P. , Cao, Z. , and Hong, J. K. , 2006, “Low Cycle Fatigue Procedure Using the Weld Master S-N Curve,” ASME Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93607.
Jaime, B. , Weir, M. S. , and Kan, W. C. , 2003, “Fatigue Design and Performance Verification of Deepwater Risers,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2003-37492.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Two-side yields conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Lower-side pipe yields

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Upper-side pipe yields

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of mechanical response of one-dimensional rate independent perfect plasticity model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The relationship of c and e in two-side yield

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Girth butt weld test specimen for LCF test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normalized force-moment of one-side yields

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Stress distribution through cross section for two-side yield condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Six kinds of two-side yield

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Normalized force and moment in one- and two-side yield

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Summary of the new approach to obtain pseudo structural stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) Beam element model representing a pipe section and (b) load-deflection curve for specimen G2 with calibrate equivalent yield strength

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Actual stress with other fatigue data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Stress calculated from elastic core method with other fatigue data

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In