Effect of axial acceleration on drivetrain responses in a spar-type floating wind turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
Amir R. Nejad

Associate Professor, Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian Un. of Sci. & Tech. (NTNU), NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway

Erin E. Bachynski

Associate Professor, Department of Marine Technology, NTNU, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway

Torgeir Moan

Professor, Department of Marine Technology, NTNU, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4041996 History: Received December 02, 2017; Revised August 08, 2018


Common industrial practice for designing floating wind turbines is to set an operational limit for the tower-top axial acceleration, normally in the range of 0.2-0.3g, which is typically understood to be related to the safety of turbine components. This paper investigates the rationality of the tower-top acceleration limit by evaluating the correlation between acceleration and drivetrain responses. A 5 MW reference drivetrain is selected and modelled on a spar-type floating wind turbine in 320 m water depth. A range of environmental conditions are selected based on the long-term distribution of wind speed, significant wave height, and peak period from hindcast data for the Northern North Sea. For each condition, global analysis using an aero-hydro-servo-elastic tool is carried out for six one-hour realizations. The global analysis results provide useful information on their own - regarding the correlation between environmental condition and tower top acceleration, and correlation between tower top acceleration and other responses of interest - which are used as input in a decoupled analysis approach. The load effects and motions from the global analysis are applied on a detailed drivetrain model in a multi-body system (MBS) analysis tool. The local responses on bearings are then obtained from MBS analysis and post-processed for the correlation study. Although the maximum acceleration provides a good indication of the wave-induced loads, it is not seen to be a good predictor for significant fatigue damage on the main bearings in this case.

Copyright (c) 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In