Three-dimensional steady multistage calculations, using the mixing plane approach, are compared with experimental measurement in a low speed 3-stage model turbine. The comparisons are made with two levels of shroud seal clearance, one representative of a real turbine and one with minimal seal clearance and almost no shroud leakage. Three different calculations are compared. The first computes the main blade path with no modelling of shroud leakage. The second includes a simple model of shroud leakage using sources and sinks on the end-walls and the third is a multiblock calculation with all leakage paths and cavities computed. It is found that neglect of shroud leakage makes the computed velocity profiles and loss distributions significantly different to those measured. Simple modelling of shroud leakage gives some improvement but full calculation of the leakage flows and cavities is necessary to obtain good agreement between calculation and measurement.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
June 6–9, 2005
Reno, Nevada, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- International Gas Turbine Institute
ISBN:
0-7918-4730-6
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
The Importance of Shroud Leakage Modelling in Multistage Turbine Flow Calculations
Budimir Rosic,
Budimir Rosic
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
John D. Denton,
John D. Denton
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Graham Pullan
Graham Pullan
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Budimir Rosic
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
John D. Denton
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Graham Pullan
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Paper No:
GT2005-68459, pp. 561-570; 10 pages
Published Online:
November 11, 2008
Citation
Rosic, B, Denton, JD, & Pullan, G. "The Importance of Shroud Leakage Modelling in Multistage Turbine Flow Calculations." Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 6: Turbo Expo 2005, Parts A and B. Reno, Nevada, USA. June 6–9, 2005. pp. 561-570. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2005-68459
Download citation file:
15
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
The Importance of Shroud Leakage Modeling in Multistage Turbine Flow Calculations
J. Turbomach (October,2006)
Aerothermal Investigations of Tip Leakage Flow in Axial Flow Turbines—Part II: Effect of Relative Casing Motion
J. Turbomach (January,2009)
Related Chapters
Aerodynamic Performance Analysis
Axial-Flow Compressors
Insights and Results of the Shutdown PSA for a German SWR 69 Type Reactor (PSAM-0028)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential