Slug flow is one of the common flow patterns in gas and oil production and transportation. One of the closure relationships required by the multiphase flow mechanistic models is slug length correlation. There are several closure relationships proposed in the literature as function of pipe geometry, pipe diameter and inclination angle, and to a lesser extent to the flow rates and fluid properties. In this paper, we show that most of the frequently used mechanistic models are insensitive to slug length information. The only exception to this is identified as the Zhang et al. Unified model [1]. The unified model shows sensitivity at high gas flow rates, while displaying a negligible sensitivity at low gas flow rates. In conclusion, the slug length closure relationship is not crucial for pressure loss and holdup calculations. It can be speculated that the success of the unit cell slug flow modeling approach could be attributed to insensitivity of the models to slug length considering the highly probabilistic nature of the slug length.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2009 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
May 31–June 5, 2009
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4347-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Sensitivity of Slug Flow Mechanistic Models on Slug Length
Hong-Quan Zhang,
Hong-Quan Zhang
The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert J. Wilkens
Robert J. Wilkens
University of Dayton, Dayton, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Cem Sarica
The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK
Hong-Quan Zhang
The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK
Robert J. Wilkens
University of Dayton, Dayton, OH
Paper No:
OMAE2009-80141, pp. 621-627; 7 pages
Published Online:
February 16, 2010
Citation
Sarica, C, Zhang, H, & Wilkens, RJ. "Sensitivity of Slug Flow Mechanistic Models on Slug Length." Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 7: Offshore Geotechnics; Petroleum Technology. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. May 31–June 5, 2009. pp. 621-627. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2009-80141
Download citation file:
6
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Fluids Transport Optimization Using Seabed Separation
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,2000)
PCB Migration and Cleanup Scenarios in Natural Gas Pipelines
J. Energy Resour. Technol (June,2004)
Advanced Geothermal Wellbore Hydraulics Model
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,2000)
Related Chapters
Siphon Seals and Water Legs
Hydraulics, Pipe Flow, Industrial HVAC & Utility Systems: Mister Mech Mentor, Vol. 1
Re-entrant Gas Flows of High-speed Ventilated Supercavity
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Completing the Picture
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine