Since its inception about 200 years ago, Lagrangian mechanics has been based upon the Principle of D’Alembert. There are, however, many physical situations where this confining principle is not suitable, and the constraint forces do work. To date, such situations are excluded from general Lagrangian formulations. This paper releases Lagrangian mechanics from this confinement, by generalizing D’Alembert’s principle, and presents the explicit equations of motion for constrained mechanical systems in which the constraints are nonideal. These equations lead to a simple and new fundamental view of Lagrangian mechanics. They provide a geometrical understanding of constrained motion, and they highlight the simplicity with which Nature seems to operate.

1.
Lagrange, J. L., 1787, Mecanique Analytique, Mme Ve Courcier, Paris.
2.
Gauss
,
C. F.
,
1829
, “
Uber Ein Neues Allgemeines Grundgesetz der Mechanik
,”
J. Reine Ang. Math.,
,
4
, pp.
232
235
.
3.
Gibbs
,
J. W.
,
1879
, “
On the Fundamental Formulae of Dynamics
,”
Am. J. Math.
,
2
, pp.
49
64
.
4.
Appell
,
P.
,
1899
, “
Sur une Forme Generale des Equations de la Dynamique
,”
,
129
, pp.
459
460
.
5.
Pars, L. A., 1979, A treatise on Analytical Dynamics, Oxbow Press, Woodridge, CT, p. 202.
6.
Dirac, P. A. M., 1964, Lectures in Quantum Mechanics, Yeshiva University, New York.
7.
,
F. E.
, and
Kalaba
,
R. E.
,
1992
, “
A New Perspective on Constrained Motion
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
439
, pp.
407
410
.
8.
Udwadia, F. E., and Kalaba, R. E., 1996, Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9.
10.
,
F. E.
, and
Kalaba
,
R. E.
,
2000
, “
Non-ideal Constraints and Lagrangian Dynamics
,”
J. Aerosp. Eng.,
,
13
, pp.
17
22
.
11.
Penrose
,
R.
,
1955
, “
A Generalized Inverse of Matrices
,”
Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.
,
51
, pp.
406
413
.
12.
,
F. E.
, and
Kalaba
,
R. E.
,
1995
, “
The Geometry of Constrained Motion
,”
Z. Angew. Math. Mech.
,
75
, pp.
637
640
.