Abstract

A common method of generating a tensile wave in Split-Hopkinson bar experiments is to impact a hollow striker on an anvil/collar attached to the incident bar. When the anvil/collar is attached to the incident bar using screw threads, the incident signals usually deviate from the classical trapezoidal form. In order to minimize this deviation, it is a common practice to sufficiently tighten these threads. However, the fundamental reasons for (i) the signal distortion when the threads are not tightened and (ii) how the distortion is eliminated or minimized on tightening are lacking. For a given diameter of the incident bar, the parameters of the thread that govern the incident signals are its pitch and backlash between the mating threads. The effect of these two parameters is investigated using the finite element method. The finite element results show that in the absence of a backlash, the incident signals obtained from a collar that is integral to the incident bar and a collar that is attached by screw threads are practically identical. When threaded collars are used, the pitch of the screw threads does not influence the incident wave. However, the backlash leads to a dramatic distortion of the incident signals under certain conditions. Insights from the finite element analysis are used to develop a one-dimensional analytical model that explains the distortion of the incident signals. The model is also validated against experiments.

References

1.
Kuhn
,
H.
, and
Medlin
,
D.
,
2000
,
ASM Handbook Volume 8: Mechanical Testing and Evaluation
,
American Society of Materials
,
Materials Park, OH
.
2.
Chen
,
W. W.
, and
Song
,
B.
,
2010
,
Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar: Design, Testing and Applications
,
Springer Science & Business Media
,
Berlin
.
3.
Nicholas
,
T.
,
1981
, “
Tensile Testing of Materials at High Rates of Strain
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
21
(
5
), pp.
177
185
.
4.
Staab
,
G. H.
, and
Gilat
,
A.
,
1991
, “
A Direct-Tension Split Hopkinson Bar for High Strain-Rate Testing
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
31
(
3
), pp.
232
235
.
5.
Chen
,
Y.
,
Clausen
,
A. H.
,
Hopperstad
,
O. S.
, and
Langseth
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Application of a Split-Hopkinson Tension Bar in a Mutual Assessment of Experimental Tests and Numerical Predictions
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
38
(
10
), pp.
824
836
.
6.
Seidt
,
J. D.
,
2010
, “
Plastic Deformation and Ductile Fracture of 2024-T351Aluminum Under Various Loading Conditions
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
Ohio State University
,
Columbus, OH
.
7.
Rodriguez
,
J.
,
Navarro
,
C.
, and
Sánchez-Gálvez
,
V.
,
1994
, “
Numerical Assessment of the Dynamic Tension Test Using the Split Hopkinson Bar
,”
J. Test. Eval.
,
22
(
4
), pp.
335
342
.
8.
Yokoyama
,
T.
,
2003
, “
Experimental Determination of Impact Tensile Properties of Adhesive Butt Joints With the Split Hopkinson Bar
,”
J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des.
,
38
(
3
), pp.
233
245
.
9.
Verleysen
,
P.
, and
Degrieck
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Experimental Investigation of the Deformation of Hopkinson Bar Specimens
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
30
(
3
), pp.
239
253
.
10.
Pothnis
,
J. R.
,
Perla
,
Y.
,
Arya
,
H.
, and
Naik
,
N. K.
,
2011
, “
High Strain Rate Tensile Behavior of Aluminum Alloy 7075 T651 and Is 2062 Mild Steel
,”
J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
,
133
(
2
), p.
021026
.
11.
Gerlach
,
R.
,
Kettenbeil
,
C.
, and
Petrinic
,
N.
,
2012
, “
A New Split Hopkinson Tensile Bar Design
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
50
(
1
), pp.
63
67
.
12.
Sharma
,
A. P.
,
Khan
,
S. H.
, and
Parameswaran
,
V.
,
2019
, “
Response and Failure of Fiber Metal Laminates Subjected to High Strain Rate Tensile Loading
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
,
53
(
11
), pp.
1489
1506
.
13.
Huh
,
H.
,
Kang
,
W. J.
, and
Han
,
S. S.
,
2002
, “
A Tension Split Hopkinson Bar for Investigating the Dynamic Behavior of Sheet Metals
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
42
(
1
), pp.
8
17
.
14.
Shin
,
H.
,
Lee
,
J.-H.
,
Kim
,
J.-B.
, and
Sohn
,
S.-I.
,
2020
, “
Design Guidelines for the Striker and Transfer Flange of a Split Hopkinson Tension Bar and the Origin of Spurious Waves
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
234
(
1
), pp.
137
151
.
15.
Oi
,
K.
,
1966
, “
Transient Response of Bonded Strain Gages
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
6
(
9
), pp.
463
469
.
16.
Nguyen
,
K.-H.
,
Kim
,
H. C.
,
Shin
,
H.
,
Yoo
,
Y.-H.
, and
Kim
,
J.-B.
,
2017
, “
Numerical Investigation Into the Stress Wave Transmitting Characteristics of Threads in the Split Hopkinson Tensile Bar Test
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
109
(
1
), pp.
253
263
.
17.
Wang
,
L.
,
2011
,
Foundations of Stress Waves
,
Elsevier
,
Oxford
.
18.
Gong
,
J. C.
,
Malvern
,
L. E.
, and
Jenkins
,
D. A.
,
1990
, “
Dispersion Investigation in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar
,”
ASME J. Mater. Technol.
,
112
(
3
), pp.
309
314
.
You do not currently have access to this content.