Float Over Installation Method—Comprehensive Comparison Between Numerical and Model Test Results

[+] Author and Article Information
Arcandra Tahar, John Halkyard, Atle Steen, Lyle Finn

 Technip USA, Houston, TX 77079

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 128(3), 256-262 (Feb 22, 2006) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2199556 History: Received October 08, 2004; Revised February 22, 2006

Installing a large deck onto a platform, such as a spar, using the floatover method is gaining popularity. This is because the operational cost is much lower than other methods of installation, such as modular lifts or a single piece installation by a heavy lift barge. Deck integration can be performed on land, at quay side and will not depend on a heavy lift barge. A new concept for a floatover vessel has been developed for operations in the Gulf of Mexico and West Africa. In this application sea state conditions are essential factors that must be considered in the Gulf of Mexico, especially for transportation. In West Africa, swell conditions will govern floatover deck (FOD) installation. Based on these two different environmental conditions, Technip Offshore, Inc. developed the FOD installation concept using semi-submersible barge type vessels. A significant amount of development work and model testing has been done on this method in recent years on spar floatover. These tests have validated our numerical methods. Another test was conducted to investigate the feasibility of a deck float-over operation onto a compliant tower for a West Africa project. The project consists of a compliant tower supporting a 25,401metricton(28,000s.ton) integrated deck. This paper will describe comparisons between model test data and numerical predictions of the compliant tower floatover operation.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

The statistic of 0% load transfer

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Density spectrum of BMU big, 85% load transfer with Mating 1 wave

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

The statistic of 85% load transfer

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Ochi-Hubble spectrum for squall environment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Density spectrum of Mating 1 wave

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Density spectrum of relative surge, premating condition with Mating 1 wave; (a) time series; (b) spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Time history and density spectrum of relative heave, premating condition with Mating 1 wave

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

The statistic of premating condition

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Density spectrum of lashing tension, 0% load transfer with Mating 1 wave

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Time history of TMU 2, 0% load transfer with Mating 1 wave

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Pontoon barge configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Lashing configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Spring curve for TMU

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Spring curve for BMU-small

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Spring curve for BMU-big

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Ochi-Hubble spectrum for mating 1 environment



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In