Research Papers: Ocean Engineering

Behavior of a Pontoon Supported by a Mooring Dolphin in a Tsunami (First Report)

[+] Author and Article Information
Mitsuhiro Masuda

Assistant Professor
Department of Maritime Systems Engineering,
Division of Marine Technology,
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology,
Tokyo, Japan
e-mail: masuda@kaiyodai.ac.jp

Koichi Masuda

e-mail: masuda.koichi@nihon-u.ac.jp

Tomoki Ikoma

e-mail: ikoma.tomoki@nihon-u.ac.jp
Department of Oceanic Architecture and Engineering,
CST, Nihon University Chiyoda,

Kuniaki Shoji

Japan Transport Safety Board
Tokyo, Japan
e-mail: shoji-k2kq@mlit.go.jp

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Manuscript received November 18, 2011; final manuscript received September 28, 2012; published online February 25, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Ron Riggs.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 135(2), 021102 (Feb 25, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: OMAE-11-1102; doi: 10.1115/1.4023249 History: Received November 18, 2011; Revised September 28, 2012

In recent years, a number of floating facilities for the utilization of ocean space, such as a marine disaster prevention base, floating restaurant, or floating container terminal, are planned, and some of them are actually built. Most of these facilities are of the pontoon-type floating structure, and the mooring system is basically a mooring dolphin. In the design of such facilities, it is important that the prediction of the motions of a pontoon-type floating body, supported by a mooring dolphin, in a tsunami is obtained. The objective of the present research is to develop a simulation system to obtain such predictions. In the present simulation system developed here, the three-dimensional (3D) MPS method (moving particle semi-implicit method) is used, and a solitary wave and borelike wave are applied to represent the incoming tsunami wave. The present paper is a report of the first stage of the research, and the heaving motion of the floating body acted upon by the tsunami is paid special attention, and we also report on the results of the study of the detaching of the floating body from the mooring dolphin.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Masuda, K., Masuda, M., and Ikoma, T., 2010, “Study on Collision Forces on Water-Front Facilities Induced by Floating Vessels Washed Onto Apron by Tsunami,” Proc. of OMAE’10, ASME, Paper No. OMAE2010-20501. [CrossRef]
Kubo, M., Sakakibara, S., Kobayashi, E., Koshimura, T., and Mizui, S., 2004, “On the Impact of the Generation of Large Scale Tsunami on Anchored Vessels,” Institute of Social Safety Science, No. 14, pp. 65–68.
Uchida, M., Masuda, K., Ikoma, T., and Maeda, H., 2006, “Research on the Response of Floating Structures to Tsunami in the Vicinity of the Quay Side,” Lecture Meeting of The Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, No. 2E, pp. 87–88.
Koshizuka, S., and Oka, Y., 1996, “Moving-Particle Semi-Implicit Method for Fragmentation of Incompressible Fluid,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 123(3), pp. 421–434.
Masuda, M., Ikoma, T., Masuda, K., and Maeda, H., 2008, “A Study on Predictions of Fully Nonlinear Motion Aircushion Type Floating Structures Using 2D MPS Method,” Proc. of OMAE'08, ASME, Paper No. OMAE2008-57387. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Arrangement of the wave meter for measured the incident wave height. (b) Experimental setup system.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Coordinate system for floating washed onto the apron in numerical calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of the time history of the incident wave elevation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Comparison of the maximum water elevation on the apron side at each point from H4 through H7. (b) Comparison of the time history of the water elevation at H4 on the apron. (c) Comparison of the time history of water elevation at H5 on the apron. (d) Comparison of the time history of water elevation at H6 on the apron. (e) Comparison of the time history of water elevation at H7 on the apron.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of the time history of dynamic pressure on the apron side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Horizontal displacement of a floating vessel washed onto the apron by a tsunami. (b) Vertical displacement of a floating vessel washed onto the apron by a tsunami.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Snapshots of the experiment versus the MPS method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the time history of the collision force (X = 0.3 m)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) Calculation setup system (x-y). (b) Calculation setup system (x-z).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) Incident wave elevation (solitary wave). (b) Horizontal displacement (solitary wave). (c) Vertical displacement (solitary wave). (d) Snapshots of calculations (solitary wave). (e) Snapshots of the detachment of the floating body (time = 48.0 s).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Incident wave height (bore). (b) Horizontal displacement (bore). (c) Vertical displacement (bore). (d) Snapshots of the calculations (bore). (e) Snapshot of the detachment of the floating body (time = 70.0 s). (f) Snapshot of the detachment of the floating body (time = 82.0 s).



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In