Research Papers: Materials Technology

Fatigue Testing of Full Scale Girth Welded Pipes Under Variable Amplitude Loading

[+] Author and Article Information
Y.-H. Zhang

TWI Ltd.,
Cambridge CB21 6AL, UK
e-mail: yanhui.zhang@twi.co.uk

S. J. Maddox

TWI Ltd.,
Cambridge CB21 6AL, UK

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 23, 2013; final manuscript received October 15, 2013; published online January 17, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Xin Sun.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 136(2), 021401 (Jan 17, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-13-1014; doi: 10.1115/1.4026025 History: Received January 23, 2013; Revised October 15, 2013

In the fatigue design of steel catenary risers, there are concerns regarding the fatigue damage to girth welds from low stresses, below the constant amplitude fatigue limit, in the loading spectrum and the validity of Miner's cumulative damage rule. These fundamental issues were addressed in a recent joint-industrial project (JIP). A key feature was development of the resonance fatigue testing rigs to enable them to test full-scale pipes under variable amplitude loading. Such tests were performed under a loading spectrum representative of that experienced by some risers, with many tests lasting over 100 million cycles to investigate the fatigue damage due to small stresses as well as the validity of Miner's rule. However, the resonance rigs are only capable of producing spectrum loading by gradually increasing or decreasing the applied load whereas more “spiky” random load sequences may be relevant in practice. Therefore, the program also included fatigue tests in conventional testing machines on strip specimens cut from pipes to compare the two types of loading sequence. This paper presents the results of these tests, conclusions drawn, and recommendations for changes to current fatigue design guidance for girth welded pipes regarding the definition of the fatigue limit, allowance for the damaging effect of low stresses, and the validity of Miner's rule.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Berger, C., Eulitz, K.-G., Heuler, P., Kotte, K.-L., Naundorf, H., Schütz, W., Sonsino, C. M., Wimmer, A., and Zenner, H., 2002, “Betriebsfestigkeit in Germany—An Overview,” Int. J. Fatigue, 24(6), pp. 603–625. [CrossRef]
Tilly, G. P., 1985, “Fatigue of Land-Based Structures,” Int. J Fatigue, 7(2), pp. 67–78. [CrossRef]
Gurney, T. R., 2006, Cumulative Damage of Welded Joints, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
Zhang, Y. H., and Maddox, S. J., 2009, “Investigation of Fatigue Damage to Welded Joints Under Variable Amplitude Loading Spectra,” Int. J. Fatigue, 31, pp. 138–152. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. H., and Maddox, S. J., 2011, “Development of Fatigue Testing of Full-Scale Girth Welded Pipes Under Variable Amplitude Loading,” Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2011, R.Riggs, ed., Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Paper No. OMAE2011–49942.
British Standards Institution, 2005, “BS 7910:2005 Guide on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures,” British Standards Institution, London.
British Standards Institution,1993, “BS 7608:1993 Fatigue Design and Assessment of Steel Structure,” British Standards Institution, London.
Maddox, S. J., and Zhang, Y. H., 2008, “Comparison of Fatigue of Girth-Welds in Full-Scale Pipes and Small-Scale Strip Specimens,” Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, B.Leira, ed., Estoril, Portugal, Paper No. OMAE2008-57103.
Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 2010, “DNV-RP-C203 Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures,” DNV, Baerum, Norway.
Pyttel, B., Schwerdt, D., and Berger, C., 2011, “Very High Cycle Fatigue—Is There a Fatigue Limit?,” Int. J. Fatigue, 33, pp. 49–58. [CrossRef]
Salama, M. M., 1999, “Fatigue Design of Girth Welded Pipes and the Validity of Using Strips,” Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, S.Liu, ed., St. John's, Canada, Paper No. OMAE99/MAT-2003.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

An actual cyclic loading sequence (peak stresses in each loading and unloading cycle) that illustrates the good repeatability of the loading block in the VA testing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stress distribution and definition for each subspectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Resonance fatigue testing of the full-scale pipes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Strip specimen dimensions and strain gauge locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Loading patterns of the subspectrum VT-2, used for VA testing of the strip specimens: (a) sequential loading (same sequence as that used for the full scale pipes) and (b) random loading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of the constant amplitude fatigue performance of the full-scale and strip specimens with the class D mean curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of variable amplitude test results for the full-scale pipes with bilinear versions of constant amplitude S-N curves, with VA data presented in terms of equivalent stress range calculated using a bilinear S-N curve with slope change from 3.0 to 5.0 at 5 × 107 cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variable amplitude fatigue data obtained from full scale pipes and strip specimens illustrating effect of loading sequence (sequential or random) on fatigue performance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Macrosections of the two welds in pipe S12 after being tested under CA loading for 108 cycles: (a) weld W1, showing a 0.14 mm deep crack at the toe of the weld root bead and (b) weld W2, with no evidence of cracking in the region of poorest profile (WRBH = 0.47 mm). The definitions for hi-lo and WRBH are shown in the figure.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Macrosections of the two welds in pipe S15 after being tested under VA-5 loading (minimum stress range of 40 MPa) for 1.96 × 108 cycles, showing fatigue cracking at the toe of weld root bead: (a) W1 weld, 0.19 mm deep crack and (b) W2 weld, 93 μm deep crack that initiated in a region of poor profile (WRBH = 0.58 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Dependence of the ratio of the calculated fatigue life based on a bilinear S-N curve to that based on a single slope S-N curve on the minimum stress range in the applied loading spectrum



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In