0
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering | Volume 137 | Issue 5 | research-article
Research Papers: Ocean Engineering

Comparison of Distributions of Wave Heights From Nonlinear Schröedinger Equation Simulations and Laboratory Experiments

[+] Author and Article Information
Huidong Zhang, Zhivelina Cherneva, Carlos Guedes Soares

Centre for Marine Technology
and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC),
Instituto Superior Técnico,
Universidade de Lisboa,
Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal

Miguel Onorato

Dipartimento di Fisica,
Universitá di Torino,
Via P. Giuria 1,
Torino 10125, Italy

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 17, 2013; final manuscript received July 30, 2015; published online August 20, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Celso P. Pesce.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 137(5), 051102 (Aug 20, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: OMAE-13-1038; doi: 10.1115/1.4031218 History: Received April 17, 2013; Revised July 30, 2015
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

Numerical simulations of the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation are performed by imposing randomly synthesized free surface displacement at the wave maker characterized by the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP) spectrum and compared with four different sea states generated in the deepwater wave basin of Marintek. The comparisons show that the numerical simulations have a high degree of agreement with the laboratory experiments although a little overestimation can be observed, especially in the severe sea state. Thus, the simulations still catch the main characteristics of extreme waves and provide an important physical insight into their generation. The coefficient of kurtosis λ40 presents a similar spatial evolution trend with the abnormal wave density, and the nonlinear Gram–Charlier (GC) model is used to predict the wave height distribution. It is demonstrated again that the theoretical approximation based on the GC expansion can describe large wave heights reasonably well in most cases. However, if the sea state is severe, wave breaking can significantly decrease the actual tail of wave height distribution, and discrepancy occurs when comparing with the numerical simulation. Moreover, the number of waves also plays an important role on the prediction of extreme wave height.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Simulation , Waves , Seas
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
Clauss, G. , 2002, “ Dramas of the Sea: Episodic Waves and Their Impact on Offshore Structures,” Appl. Ocean Res., 24(3), pp. 147–161. [CrossRef]
2
Kharif, C. , Pelinovsky, E. , and Slunyaev, A. , 2009, Rogue Waves in the Ocean, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 11–31.
3
Guedes Soares, C. , Cherneva, Z. , Petrova, P. , and Antão, E. , 2011, “ Large Waves in Sea States,” Marine Technology and Engineering, C. Guedes Soares , Y. Garbatov , N. Fonseca , and A. P. Teixeira , eds., Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp. 79–95.
4
Onorato, M. , Osborne, A. , Serio, M. , and Bertone, S. , 2001, “ Freak Waves in Random Oceanic Sea States,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(25), pp. 5831–5834. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5
Lighthill, M. J. , 1965, “ Contribution to the Theory of Waves in Nonlinear Dispersive Systems,” J. Inst. Math. Appl., 1(3), pp. 269–306. [CrossRef]
6
Benjamin, T. B. , and Feir, J. E. , 1967, “ The Disintegration of Wave Trains on Deep Water. Part 1. Theory,” J. Fluid Mech., 27(3), pp. 417–430. [CrossRef]
7
Zakharov, V. E. , 1968, “ Stability of Periodic Waves of Finite Amplitude on a Surface of Deep Fluid,” ASME J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 9(2), pp. 190–194. [CrossRef]
8
Hasimoto, H. , and Ono, H. , 1972, “ Nonlinear Modulation of Gravity Waves,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 33(3), pp. 805–811. [CrossRef]
9
Mei, C. C. , 1989, The Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surface Waves, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp. 605–618.
10
Zakharov, V. E. , and Shabat, A. B. , 1972, “ Exact Theory of Two-Dimensional Self-Focusing and One-Dimensional Self-Modulation of Waves in Nonlinear Media,” Sov. Phys., JETP, 34, pp. 62–69.
11
Dysthe, K. B. , 1979, “ Note on a Modification to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation for Application to Deep Water Waves,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 369(1736), pp. 105–114. [CrossRef]
12
Trulsen, K. , and Dysthe, K. B. , 1996, “ A Modified Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation for Broader Bandwidth Gravity Waves on Deep Water,” Wave Motion, 24(3), pp. 281–289. [CrossRef]
13
Trulsen, K. , Kliakhandler, I. , Dysthe, K. B. , and Velarde, M. G. , 2000, “ On Weakly Nonlinear Modulation of Waves on Deep Water,” Phys. Fluids, 12(10), pp. 2432–2437. [CrossRef]
14
Lo, E. , and Mei, C. C. , 1985, “ A Numerical Study of Water-Wave Modulation Based on a Higher-Order Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation,” J. Fluid Mech., 150, pp. 395–416. [CrossRef]
15
Ablowitz, M. I. , Hammack, D. , Henderson, J. , and Scholder, C. M. , 2000, “ Modulated Periodic Stokes Waves in Deep Water,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, pp. 887–890. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16
Slunyaev, A. , Pelinovsky, E. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2005, “ Modeling Freak Waves From the North Sea,” Appl. Ocean Res., 27(1), pp. 12–22. [CrossRef]
17
Shemer, L. , Sergeeva, A. , and Slunyaev, A. , 2010, “ Applicability of Envelope Model Equations for Simulation of Narrow-Spectrum Unidirectional Random Wave Field Evolution: Experimental Validation,” Phys. Fluids, 22(1), p. 016601. [CrossRef]
18
Peregrine, D. H. , Skyner, D. , Stiassnie, M. , and Dold, N. , 1988, “ Nonlinear Effects on Focused Water Waves,” 21st International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Torremolinos, Spain, Vol. 1, pp. 732–742.
19
Osborne, A. , 2000, “ Nonlinear Instability Analysis of Deep Water Wave Trains: Computation of Maximum Heights of Rogue Waves,” ASME Paper No. OSU OFT-4033.
20
Ablowitz, M. I. , Hammack, D. , Henderson, J. , and Scholder, C. M. , 2001, “ Long-Time Dynamics of the Modulational Instability of Deep Water,” Physica D, 152–153, pp. 416–433. [CrossRef]
21
Onorato, M. , Osborne, A. , Serio, M. , Cavaleri, L. , Brandini, C. , and Stansberg, C. , 2004, “ Observation of Strongly Non-Gaussian Statistics for Random Sea Surface Gravity Waves in Wave Flume Experiments,” Phys. Rev. E, 70(6), p. 067302. [CrossRef]
22
Onorato, M. , Osborne, A. , Serio, M. , and Cavaleri, L. , 2005, “ Modulational Instability and Non-Gaussian Statistics in Experimental Random Water-Wave Trains,” Phys. Fluids, 17(7), p. 078101. [CrossRef]
23
Onorato, M. , Osborne, A. , and Serio, M. , 2006, “ Modulational Instability in Crossing Sea States: A Possible Mechanism for the Formation of Freak Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, p. 014503. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24
Zakharov, V. E. , Dyachenko, A. , and Prokofiev, A. , 2006, “ Freak Waves as Nonlinear Stage of Stokes Wave Modulation Instability,” Eur. J. Mech. B, 25(5), pp. 677–692. [CrossRef]
25
Slunyaev, A. , Pelinovsky, E. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2011, “ Reconstruction of Extreme Events Through Numerical Simulations,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2011-50314.
26
Shemer, L. , Sergeeva, A. , and Liberzon, D. , 2010, “ Effect of the Initial Spectrum on the Spatial Evolution of Statistics of Unidirectional Nonlinear Random Waves,” J. Geophys. Res., 115, p. C12039. [CrossRef]
27
Longuet-Higgins, M. , 1952, “ On the Statistical Distribution of the Heights of Sea Waves,” J. Mar. Res., 11(3), pp. 245–266.
28
Guedes Soares, C. , 2003, “ Probabilistic Models of Waves in the Coastal Zone,” Advances in Coastal Modeling, C. Lakhan , ed., Elsevier Science, Windsor, Canada, pp. 159–187.
29
Naess, A. , 1985, “ On the Distribution of Crest-to-Trough Wave Heights,” Ocean Eng., 12(3), pp. 221–234. [CrossRef]
30
Boccotti, P. , 1989, “ On Mechanics of Irregular Gravity Waves,” Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei, Mem., 19, pp. 110–170.
31
Boccotti, P. , 2000, Wave Mechanics for Ocean Engineering, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 75–90.
32
Tayfun, M. A. , 1980, “ Narrow-Band Nonlinear Sea Waves,” J. Geophys. Res., 85(C3), pp. 1548–1552. [CrossRef]
33
Tayfun, M. A. , and Fedele, F. , 2007, “ Wave-Height Distributions and Nonlinear Effects,” Ocean Eng., 34(11–12), pp. 1631–1649. [CrossRef]
34
Petrova, P. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2008, “ Maximum Wave Crest and Height Statistics of Irregular and Abnormal Waves in an Offshore Basin,” Appl. Ocean Res., 30(2), pp. 144–152. [CrossRef]
35
Guedes Soares, C. , Cherneva, Z. , and Antão, E. , 2003, “ Characteristics of Abnormal Waves in North Sea Storm Sea States,” Appl. Ocean Res., 25(6), pp. 337–344. [CrossRef]
36
Guedes Soares, C. , Cherneva, Z. , and Antão, E. , 2004, “ Abnormal Waves During the Hurricane Camille,” J. Geophys. Res., 109, p. C08008.
37
Petrova, P. , Cherneva, Z. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2006, “ Distribution of Crest Heights in Sea States With Abnormal Waves,” Appl. Ocean Res., 28(4), pp. 235–245. [CrossRef]
38
Petrova, P. , Cherneva, Z. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2007, “ On the Adequacy of Second-Order Models to Predict Abnormal Waves,” Ocean Eng., 34(7), pp. 956–961. [CrossRef]
39
Mori, N. , 2003, “ Effects of Wave Breaking on Wave Statistics for Deep-Water Random Wave Train,” Ocean Eng., 30(2), pp. 205–220. [CrossRef]
40
Onorato, M. , Osborne, A. , Serio, M. , Cavaleri, L. , Brandini, C. , and Stansberg, C. , 2006, “ Extreme Waves, Modulational Instability and Second Order Theory: Wave Flume Experiments on Irregular Waves,” Eur. J. Mech. B, 25(5), pp. 586–601. [CrossRef]
41
Cherneva, Z. , Tayfun, M. A. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2009, “ Statistics of Nonlinear Waves Generated in an Offshore Wave Basin,” J. Geophys. Res., 114, p. C08005.
42
Cherneva, Z. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2011, “ Evolution of Wave Properties During Propagation in a Ship Towing Tank and an Offshore Basin,” Ocean Eng., 38(17–18), pp. 2254–2261. [CrossRef]
43
Shemer, L. , and Sergeeva, A. , 2009, “ An Experimental Study of Spatial Evolution of Statistical Parameters in a Unidirectional Narrow-Banded Random Wave Field,” J. Geophys. Res., 114, p. C01015.
44
Mori, N. , and Janssen, P. , 2006, “ On Kurtosis and Occurrence Probability of Freak Waves,” J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36(7), pp. 1471–1483. [CrossRef]
45
Cherneva, Z. , Guedes Soares, C. , and Petrova, P. , 2011, “ Distribution of Wave Height Maxima in Storm Sea States,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 133(4), p. 041601. [CrossRef]
46
Alber, I. , and Saffman, P. , 1978, “ Stability of Random Nonlinear Deep-Water Waves With Finite Bandwidth Spectra,” TRW, Defense and Space System Group, Euclid, OH, Technical Report No. 31326-6035-RU-00.
47
Janssen, P. A. E. M. , 2003, “ Nonlinear Four-Wave Interactions and Freak Waves,” J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33(4), pp. 863–884. [CrossRef]
48
Fedele, F. , Cherneva, Z. , Tayfun, M. A. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2010, “ Nonlinear Schrödinger Invariants and Wave Statistics,” Phys. Fluids, 22(3), p. 036601. [CrossRef]
49
Onorato, M. , and Proment, D. , 2011, “ Nonlinear Interactions and Extreme Waves: Envelope Equations and Experimental Results,” Marine Technology and Engineering, C. Guedes Soares , Y. Garbatov , N. Fonseca , and A. P. Teixeira , eds., Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp. 135–146.
50
Tayfun, M. A. , and Lo, J. , 1990, “ Nonlinear Effects on Wave Envelope and Phase,” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng., 116(1), pp. 79–100. [CrossRef]
51
Tomita, H. , and Kawamura, T. , 2000, “ Statistical Analysis and Inference From the In-Situ Data of the Sea of Japan With Reference to Abnormal and/or Freak Waves,” 10th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), Seattle, WA, pp. 116–122.
52
Cherneva, Z. , Tayfun, M. A. , and Guedes Soares, C. , 2013, “ Statistics of Waves With Different Steepness Simulated in a Wave Basin,” Ocean Eng., 60, pp. 186–192. [CrossRef]
53
Toffoli, A. , Gramstad, O. , Trulsen, K. , Monbaliu, J. , Bitner-Gregersen, E. M. , and Onorato, M. , 2010, “ Evolution of Weakly Nonlinear Random Directional Waves: Laboratory Experiments and Numerical Simulations,” J. Fluid Mech., 664, pp. 313–336. [CrossRef]
54
Annenkov, S. , and Shrira, V. , 2001, “ On the Predictability of Evolution of Surface Gravity and Gravity-Capillary Waves,” Physica D, 152, pp. 665–675. [CrossRef]
55
Bitner-Gregersen, E. M. , and Toffoli, A. , 2012, “ On the Probability of Occurrence of Rogue Waves,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, pp. 751–762. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Layout of the Marintek wave basin and gauge locations

+Layout of the Marintek wave basin and gauge locations
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Layout of the Marintek wave basin and gauge locations
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Relationship between the coefficient of kurtosis and the BFI. The full and empty marks represent the experimental and simulated results, respectively.

+Relationship between the coefficient of kurtosis and the BFI. The full and empty marks represent the experimental and simulated results, respectively.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Relationship between the coefficient of kurtosis and the BFI. The full and empty marks represent the experimental and simulated results, respectively.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Relationship between the scaled maximum wave height and the coefficient of kurtosis. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.

+Relationship between the scaled maximum wave height and the coefficient of kurtosis. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Relationship between the scaled maximum wave height and the coefficient of kurtosis. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relationship between Λ and Λapp. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.

+Relationship between Λ and Λapp. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Relationship between Λ and Λapp. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Spatial variation of the coefficient of kurtosis in case 8241. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.

+Spatial variation of the coefficient of kurtosis in case 8241. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Spatial variation of the coefficient of kurtosis in case 8241. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Spatial variation of the rogue wave density in case 8241. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.

+Spatial variation of the rogue wave density in case 8241. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Spatial variation of the rogue wave density in case 8241. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Exceedance distributions of scaled wave heights. The four rows correspond to four different sea states listed in Table 1. The three columns present the results obtained in the locations of gauges 1, 5, and 8, respectively. The solid line, dash line, and thick dotted-dashed line mean Rayleigh distribution, GC models in experiment, and in simulation in sequence. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.

+Exceedance distributions of scaled wave heights. The four rows correspond to four different sea states listed in Table 1. The three columns present the results obtained in the locations of gauges 1, 5, and 8, respectively. The solid line, dash line, and thick dotted-dashed line mean Rayleigh distribution, GC models in experiment, and in simulation in sequence. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Exceedance distributions of scaled wave heights. The four rows correspond to four different sea states listed in Table 1. The three columns present the results obtained in the locations of gauges 1, 5, and 8, respectively. The solid line, dash line, and thick dotted-dashed line mean Rayleigh distribution, GC models in experiment, and in simulation in sequence. The full and empty marks still have the same meaning as in Fig. 2.

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Research on a New Kind of Antenna Used in the Through-The-Earth Communication System
Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies (MIMT 2010)
3D Simulation Technology of Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation and Its Application in Songnan-Baodao Area of Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea
Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology Management and Innovation
Application of MIKE21-BW Model in the General Arrangement of a Fish Porjt
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)
Geophysical Data Processing and Identifying for Gas Hydrate in the Slope of South China Sea
International Conference on Electronics, Information and Communication Engineering (EICE 2012)
Simulation of Fast Trimaran Seakeeping Amelioration Using T-foil
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
Sign In