Research Papers: Piper and Riser Technology

An Empirical Procedure for Fatigue Damage Estimation in Instrumented Risers

[+] Author and Article Information
C. Shi

School of Petroleum Engineering,
China University of Petroleum (East China),
Qingdao, Shangdong 266580, China

L. Manuel

Department of Civil, Architectural,
and Environment Engineering,
University of Texas,
Austin, TX 78712

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received July 1, 2016; final manuscript received November 10, 2016; published online February 17, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Marcelo R. Martins.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 139(3), 031701 (Feb 17, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: OMAE-16-1076; doi: 10.1115/1.4035303 History: Received July 01, 2016; Revised November 10, 2016

In order to assess the effects of vortex-induced vibration (VIV) and to ensure riser integrity, field monitoring campaigns are often conducted wherein the riser response is recorded by a few data sensors distributed along the length of the riser. In this study, two empirical techniques–proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and weighted waveform analysis (WWA)–are sequentially applied to the data; together, they offer a novel empirical procedure for fatigue damage estimation in an instrumented riser. The procedures are briefly described as follows: first, POD is used to extract the most energetic spatial modes of the riser response from the measurements, which are defined only at the available sensor locations. Accordingly, a second step uses WWA to express each dominant POD mode as a series of riser natural modes that are continuous spatial functions defined over the entire riser length. Based on the above empirically identified modal information, the riser response over the entire length is reconstructed in reverse–i.e., compose identified natural modes into the POD modes and, then, assemble all these dominant POD modal response components into the derived riser response. The POD procedure empirically extracts the energetic dynamic response characteristics without any assumptions and effectively cleans the data of noisy or less important features; this fundamental application of WWA is used to identify dominant riser natural modes–all this is possible using the limited number of available measurements from sensor locations. Application of the procedure is demonstrated using experimental data from the Norwegian Deepwater Programme (NDP) model riser.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Tognarelli, M. , Taggart, S. , and Campbell, M. , 2008, “ Actual VIV Fatigue Response of Full Scale Drilling Risers: With and Without Suppression Devices,” 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2008), Estoril, Portugal, June 15–20.
Kleiven, G. , 2002, “ Identifying VIV Vibration Modes by Use of the Empirical Orthogonal Functions Technique,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2002-28425.
Trim, A. , Braaten, H. , Lie, H. , and Tognarelli, M. , 2005, “ Experimental Investigation of Vortex-Induced Vibration of Long Marine Risers,” J. Fluids Struct., 21(3), pp. 335–361. [CrossRef]
Shi, C. , Manuel, L. , Tognarelli, M. , and Botros, T. , 2012, “ On the Vortex-Induced Vibration Response of a Model Riser and Location of Sensors for Fatigue Damage Prediction,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 134(3), p. 031802. [CrossRef]
Lucor, D. , and Triantafyllou, M. , 2008, “ Riser Response Analysis by Modal Phase Reconstruction,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 130(1), p. 011008. [CrossRef]
McNeill, S. , and Agarwal, P. , 2011, “ Efficient Modal Decomposition and Reconstruction of Riser Response Due to VIV,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2011-49469.
Shi, C. , Manuel, L. , and Tognarelli, M. , 2010, “ Alternative Empirical Procedures for Fatigue Damage Rate Estimation of Instrumented Risers Undergoing Vortex-Induced Vibration,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2010-20992.
Braaten, H. , and Lie, H. , 2004, “ NDP Riser High Mode VIV Tests,” Technical Report, Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute, Trondheim, Norway, Main Report No. 512394.00.01.
MIT, 2007, “ Vortex Induced Vibration Data Repository,” Center for Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, http://web.mit.edu/towtank/www/vivdr/datasets.html
Srivilairit, T. , Manuel, L. , and Saranyasoontorn, K. , 2006, “ On the Use of Empirical Orthogonal Decomposition of Field Data to Study Deepwater Current Profiles for Risers,” 16th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), San Francisco, CA, May 28–June 2, pp. 136–140.
Srivilairit, T. , and Manuel, L. , 2009, “ Vortex-Induced Vibration and Coincident Current Velocity Profiles for a Deepwater Drilling Riser,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 131(2), p. 021101. [CrossRef]
Lie, H. , and Kaasen, K. , 2006, “ Modal Analysis of Measurements From a Large-Scale VIV Model Test of a Riser in Linearly Sheared Flow,” J. Fluids Struct., 22(4), pp. 557–575. [CrossRef]
Shi, C. , Park, J. , Manuel, L. , and Tognarelli, M. , 2014, “ A Data-Driven Mode Identification Algorithm for Riser Fatigue Damage Assessment,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 136(3), p. 031702. [CrossRef]
Pesce, C. , Fujarra, A. , Simos, A. , and Tannuri, E. , 1999, “ Analytical and Closed Form Solutions for Deep Water Riser-Like Eigenvalue Problem,” 9th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE-1999), Brest, France, May 30–June 4, pp. 255–264.
Mazzilli, C. E. , Rizza, F. , and Dias, T. , 2016, “ Heave-Imposed Motion in Vertical Risers: A Reduced-Order Modelling Based on Bessel-Like Modes,” Procedia IUTAM, 19, pp. 136–143. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Locations of the 23 input sensors and one target sensor (sensor no. 4) used to illustrate the empirical procedure. Note pinned-pinned boundary conditions are in effect at x/L = 0 and x/L = 1.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Normalized PSD functions of the 23 input (measured) strain time series

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Normalized PSD functions for the first 13 POD subprocesses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Normal and Hilbert shape components of the fifth natural mode of the NDP model riser (with pinned-pinned boundary conditions)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized PSDs and mode shapes of the first three dominant POD modes that account for 45.6%, 33.2%, and 12.2% of the total energy, respectively

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normalized PSDs and modal shapes of the fourth and seventh POD modes that account for 1.8% and 0.9% of the total energy, respectively

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Strain time series at a selected sensor location (z/L = 0.11): direct measurements versus reconstruction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

RMS values of CF strains over the entire riser span

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Fatigue damage ratio estimated using the proposed empirical method (POD combined with WWA) with 23 strains as input. The range of damage ratios estimated with each data set is indicated in the legend.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Fatigue damage ratio estimated using the POD method (with interpolation using third-order polynomials) with 23 strains as input (an earlier study by Shi et al. [7]). The range of damage ratios estimated with each data set is indicated in the legend.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In