Research Papers: Structures and Safety Reliability

Nonlinear Computational Welding Mechanics for Large Structures

[+] Author and Article Information
Kazuki Ikushima

Graduate School of Engineering,
Osaka Prefecture University,
1-1, Gakuencho, Nakaku,
Sakai 599-8531, Osaka, Japan
e-mail: ikushima@marine.osakafu-u.ac.jp

Masakazu Shibahara

Graduate School of Engineering,
Osaka Prefecture University,
1-1, Gakuencho, Nakaku,
Sakai 599-8531, Osaka, Japan
e-mail: shibahara@marine.osakafu-u.ac.jp

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 19, 2018; final manuscript received September 2, 2018; published online October 12, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Yordan Garbatov.

J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng 141(2), 021603 (Oct 12, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: OMAE-18-1044; doi: 10.1115/1.4041395 History: Received April 19, 2018; Revised September 02, 2018

In the construction of thin plate steel structures, including ships, welding is widely used to join parts. Welding inevitably causes deformation in thin plate structures, which may cause various problems. In the present study, an analysis method is developed to realize the prediction of deformation during the construction of large-scale structures based on the thermal elastic plastic analysis method. The developed method uses the idealized explicit finite element method (IEFEM), which is a high-speed thermal elastic plastic analysis method, and an algebraic multigrid method (AMG) is also introduced to the IEFEM in order to realize an efficient analysis of large-scale thin plate structures. In order to investigate the analysis accuracy and the performance of the developed method, the developed method is applied to the analysis of deformation on the welding of a simple stiffened structure. The developed method is then applied to the prediction of welding deformation in the construction of a ship block. The obtained results indicate that the developed method has approximately the same analysis accuracy as the conventional method, and the computational speed of the developed method is dramatically faster than that of the conventional method. The developed method can analyze the welding deformation in the construction of the ship block structure which consists of more than 10 million degrees-of-freedom and is difficult to solve by the conventional method.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Ueda, Y. , and Yamakawa, T. , 1971, “ Analysis of Thermal Elastic-Plastic Stress and Strain During Welding by Finite Element Method,” Trans. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 2(2), pp. 90–100.
Zhang, Y. , Ying, Y. , Liu, X. , and Wei, H. , 2015, “ Deformation Control During the Laser Welding of a Ti6Al4V Thin Plate Using a Synchronous Gas Cooling Method,” Mater. Des., 90(C), pp. 931–941. [CrossRef]
Li, Y. , Wang, K. , Jin, Y. , Xu, M. , and Lu, H. , 2015, “ Prediction of Welding Deformation in Stiffened Structure by Introducing Thermo-Mechanical Interface Element,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 216, pp. 440–446. [CrossRef]
Brown, S. , and Song, H. , 1992, “ Implications of Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulations of Welding of Large Structures,” Weld. J., 71, pp. 55–62.
Goldak, J. , Mocanita, M. , Aldea, V. , Zhou, J. , Downey, D. , and Dorling, D. , 2000, “ Predicting Burn-Through When Welding on Pressurized Natural Gas Pipelines,” Proc. ASME Pressure Vessels Piping Conf., 410, pp. 21–28.
Murakawa, H. , Oda, I. , Ito, S. , Serizawa, H. , Shibahara, M. , and Nishikawa, H. , 2005, “ Iterative Substructure Method for Fast Computation of Thermal Elastic Plastic Welding Problems,” J. Kansai Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn., 243, pp. 67–70.
Ikushima, K. , Shibahara, M. , Itoh, S. , and Masaoka, K. , 2010, “ Development of Analytical Method for Welding Mechanics Using Idealized Explicit FEM,” The Twenty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, June 19–24, Maui, HI, Paper No. ISOPE-I-11-604.
Wriggers, P. , 2008, Nonlinear Finite Element Methods, Springer, Berlin, Chap. 6.
Harada, T. , Koshizuka, S. , and Kawaguchi, Y. , 2007, “ Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics on GPUs,” Computer Graphics International, pp. 63–70.
Ikushima, K. , and Shibahara, M. , 2014, “ Prediction of Residual Stresses in Multi-Pass Welded Joint Using Idealized Explicit FEM Accelerated by a GPU,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 93, pp. 62–67. [CrossRef]
Brandt, A. , 1977, “ Multi-Level Adaptive Solutions to Boundary-Value Problems,” Math. Comput., 31(138), pp. 333–390. [CrossRef]
Stüben, K. , 1999, “ Algebraic Multigrid (AMG): an Introduction With Applications,” GMD-Rep., 70, pp. 1–127.
Brandt, A. , McComick, S. , and Ruge, J. , 1984, “ Algebraic Multigrid (AMG) for Sparse Matrix Equations,” Sparsity and Its Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 257–284.
Vaněk, P. , Mandel, J. , and Brezina, M. , 1996, “ Algebraic Multigrid by Smoothed Aggregation for Second and Fourth Order Elliptic Problems,” Computing, 56(3), pp. 179–196. [CrossRef]
Maekawa, A. , Kawahara, A. , Serizawa, H. , and Murakawa, H. , 2015, “ Fast Three-Dimensional Multipass Welding Simulation Using an Iterative Substructure Method,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 215, pp. 30–41. [CrossRef]
Lian, W. , Murakawa, H. , and Deng, D. , 2015, “ Investigation of Welding Residual Stress Distribution in a Thick-Plate Joint With an Emphasis on the Features Near Weld End-Start,” Mater. Des., 67, pp. 303–312. [CrossRef]
Schenk, O. , Waechter, A. , and Hagemann, M. , 2007, “ Matching-Based Preprocessing Algorithms to the Solution of Saddle-Point Problems in Large-Scale Nonconvex Interior-Point Optimization,” J. Comput. Optim. Appl., 36(2–3), pp. 321–341. [CrossRef]
DAIHEN Corporation, “ KSUC-1500 Product Manual,” DAIHEN Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Yu, J. , Ozdemir, M. , Tanaka, S. , Ergin, A. , and Yao, T. , 2017, “ Influence of Welding Residual Stress on Buckling/Ultimate Strength of Stiffened Panels Subjected to Longitudinal Thrust,” TEAM2017, pp. 305–312.
Levieil, B. , Bridier, F. , Doudard, C. , Thevenet, D. , and Calloch, S. , 2017, “ Numerical Simulation of Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Welded Joints for Naval Applications: Influence of Residual Stress,” Weld. World, 61(3), pp. 551–561. [CrossRef]
Yamashita, Y. , and Minami, F. , 2008, “ Constraint Loss Correction for Assessment of Brittle Fracture Initiation in Residual Stress Field Based on the Weibull Stress Criterion,” J. Jpn. Soc. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng., 8, pp. 291–300.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Typical two-dimensional aggregates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Distribution of displacement in the z direction: (a) MGIEFEM and (b) SIFEM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Longitudinal distributions of displacements in the z direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Flow of the multigrid method introduced in the IEFEM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of the multigrid method introduced in the IEFEM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Analysis model and mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Material properties of SM490

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Transverse distributions of displacements in the z direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Distributions of longitudinal shrinkage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Distributions of transverse shrinkage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Distributions of residual stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions on the back face under the welding line

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Analysis model and assembly sequence of the double bottom block of the ship hull block

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Example of mesh divisions: (a) mesh division near the stiffener (part A in Fig. 12) and (b) mesh division near the transverse girder and the stiffener

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Distribution of temperature during welding of subassembly 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Distribution of equivalent stress during welding of subassembly 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Distribution of stress during welding of subassembly 1: (a) longitudinal srress σx and (b) transverse srress σy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Distribution of displacements on subassembly 1: (a) x-direction, (b) y-direction, and (c) z-direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Distribution of stress in the longitudinal direction (σx) on subassembly 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Distribution of displacement in the z-direction on subassembly 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Distribution of displacement in the z-direction on large-assembly 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Distribution of displacement in the z-direction on large-assembly 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Distribution of displacement in the z-direction on the ship hull block

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Displacements in the z-direction along line A-B

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Equivalent stress distribution after all welding assembly sequences



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In