Product definition information drives many business processes, yet its management at a coarse level (documents and files) precludes efficient automation and decision support. Information management at finer levels of granularity realizes the full potential of computable representations. This paper presents an industry oriented perspective of engineering information management (EIM) technologies and implementations and offers classifications of information systems as it relates to EIM systems and business processes. The concept of structured business objects that encapsulate the information and business-process definition at appropriate levels of granularity to support enterprise process dynamics is introduced. This provides a key construct to model the unique, and sometimes opposing, process perspectives within the enterprise. The paper then discusses key EIM and integration issues and future directions.

1.
Kahl, S., 1999, “What’s the “Value” of Supply Chain Software?,” Suppl. Chain Manage. Rev., Fall., pp. 59–67.
2.
Cross, N., 1989 Engineering Design Methods, Wiley, New York.
3.
Pahl G., and Beitz, W., 1984 “Engineering Design,” Design Council, London.
4.
Ullman, D., G., 1997, The Mechanical Design Process, McGraw-Hill.
5.
D. H. Brown and Associates, Inc., 1998, Lifecycle Modeling: Another Look, Available via: http://www.dhbrown.com
6.
CM Plan and CMII Rules, 1997, Institute of Configuration Management, Scottsdale, Arizona.
7.
Vollmann, T. E., Berry, W. L., and Whybark, D.C., 1984, “Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems” Irwin.
8.
Ullman, D. G., Dietterich, T. G., and Stauffer, L., 1988, “A Model of the Mechanical Design Process Based on Empirical Data: A Summary,” AI Eng ’88 Conference, Palo Alto, August.
9.
Erens, F., 1997, “The Synthesis of Variety,” Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
10.
Meyer, M., and Lehnerd, A., 1997, The Power of Product Platforms, The Free Press.
11.
Metz, P. J., 1998, “Demystifying Supply Chain Management,” Suppl. Chain Manage. Rev.
12.
Kaplan, S., and Sawhney, M., 2000, “E-Hubs: The New B2B Marketplaces,” Harvard Business Review, May–June.
13.
Prasad, B., Morenc, R., and Rangan, R. M., 1993, “Research Issues and Strategies for Information Management in Concurrent Engineering Environments,” J. Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl., 1, No. 1.
14.
Chen, P. P., 1976, “The Entity-Relationship Model—Toward a Unified View of Data,” ACM Trans. Database. Sys., 1, No. 1. March.
15.
Rambaugh, J., et al., 1991, Object-oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
16.
Teorey
,
T. J.
,
Yang
,
D.
, and
Fry
,
J. P.
,
1986
, “
A Logical Methodology for Relational Database Using the Extended Entity-Relationship
Model, ACM Comput. Surv.
,
18
, No.
2
, pp.
197
222
.
17.
Fowler, M., and Scott, K., 1998, UML Distilled, Addison-Wesley, Longman.
18.
Integrated Computer Aided Manufacturing (ICAM) Architecture, Part II, Vol. IV—Functional Modeling Manual (IDEF 0). Softech, Waltham, MA, 1981.
19.
Integrated Information Support System (IISS) Information Modeling Manual, Extended (IDEF 1X), Appleton, Manhattan Beach, CA, 1985.
20.
Hammer, M., and Champy, J., 1993, Reengineering the Corporation, Harper Business.
21.
Davenport, T. H., 1993, “Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology,” Harvard Business School Press.
22.
Majumder, D., Rangan, R. M., and Fulton, R. E., “Information Management for Integrated Design Environments.” Proc. 1993 ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference, Coronado Bay, CA.
23.
Finger, S., and Dixon, J. R., 1989, “A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part 1 (pp. 51–67) and Part 2 (pp. 121–137)” Research in Engineering Design, Springer Verlag, New York.
24.
Szykman, S., Fenves, S. J., Keirouz, W., and Shooter, S. B., 2000, “A Foundation for Interoperability in Next-Generation Product Development Systems,” Proceedings of ASME 2000 DETC/CIE Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, September 10–13.
25.
Chadha, B., et al., 1996, Enterprise Infrastructure Support for Agility, 5th National Agility Conference.
26.
Rangan, R., and Fulton, R. E., 1991, “A Data Management Strategy to Control Design and Manufacturing Information,” J. Eng. Comput., July, Springer-Verlag, NY.
27.
Rangan, R. M., Fulton, R. E., and Woolsey, T., 1990, “An Information Based CAD Design Environment to Support Multidisciplinary Design,” Proc ASME International Conference on Computers in Engineering, Boston, MA.
28.
Rangan, R., Maddux, K., Duwe, W., 1994, “A Practical Methodology to Automate Routine and Data Intensive Design Activities,” In Engineering Data Management: Integrating the Engineering Enterprise, Bocks, et al., Eds. ASME.
29.
Software Engineering Institute (SEI), http://www.sei.emu.edu/, 2000.
30.
DCAC, 2000. The Boeing Company Process Improvement Initiative: “DCAC/MRM,” http://www.boeing.com/commercial/initiatives/ under DCAC/MRM.
31.
Chadha, B., 1995, “A Model Driven Methodology for Business Process Engineering,” ASME Engineering Database Symposium.
32.
Rangan, R., and Chadha, B., “Design Patterns for Engineering Processes,” ASME 1997 Design Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, Sacramento, CA, 1997, Presentation only.
33.
Jervis, R., 1997, System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton University Press.
34.
Davenport, T. H., 1998, “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System,” Harvard Bus. Rev., August.
35.
Kassem, N., et al., 2000, Designing Enterprise Applications with the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition, Sun Java Series, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
36.
CORBA Release 3.0, http://www.omg.org
37.
STEP, Standard for the Exchange of Product model data, 2000, http://www.nist.gov/sc4/www/stepdocs.htm.
38.
OMG, Object Management Group Document dtc/00-06-02, 2000, Final Report of the Product Data Management V1.3 Revision Task Force, June.
39.
Commerce XML User’s Guide Version 1.1, 2000, http://www.cxml.org/home.
40.
XCBL 2000, XML Common Business Language, version 2.0, 2000, http://www.commerceone.com/xml.
41.
ebXML, a joint initiative of the United Nations (UN/CEFACT) and OASIS: http://www.ebxml.org/
42.
RosettaNet Partner Interface Protocols, RosettaNet Publications, 2000, http://www.rosettanet.org.
43.
EIA 649, Electronics Industries Association Standard 649: National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management, 1996.
44.
Workflow Management Coalition, 2000, http://www.aiim.org/wfmc/mainframe.htm.
45.
Sobek, D. K., et al., 1998, “
Another Look at How Toyota Integrates Product Development,” Harvard Bus. Rev., July–August.
46.
Grayson, J. P., 2000, “Web-Centric CAD for the Supplier Net,” Alibre Inc., D.H. Brown Implementation Roadmap 2000 Conference, Chicago, October, Presentations available through www.dhbrown.com.
47.
Richardson, A., 2000, “Design in the Information Age, Ford Motor Company,” ASME DETC/CIE Conference—CIE Keynote.
48.
Lundberg, R. P., 2000, “Chrysler’s Successful Transformation to a Product & Process Driven Company,” Daimler Chrysler Corporation, D.H. Brown Implementation Roadmap 2000 Conference, Chicago, October, Presentations available through www.dhbrown.com.
49.
Horter, M., 2000, “Lmtas Global Integration and Management of 21st Century Fighters,” LM Aeronautics, D.H. Brown Implementation Roadmap 2000 Conference, Chicago, October, Presentations available through www.dhbrown.com.
50.
Tessmer, B., 2000, “Collaboration Begins Inside the Enterprise,” Hutchinson Technology Inc., D.H. Brown Implementation Roadmap 2000 Conference, Chicago, October. Presentations available through www.dhbrown.com.
51.
Torchia, D. J., 2000, “Model Management and Design—Team Collaboration,” Logicon-Northrop Grumman, D.H. Brown Implementation Roadmap 2000 Conference, Chicago, October, Presentations available through www.dhbrown.com.
52.
Nalven, N., 2000, “PDM Initiatives at Northrop Grumman’s Airborne—Ground Surveillance and Battle,” Northrop Grumman, D.H. Brown Implementation Roadmap 2000 Conference, Chicago, October, Presentations available through www.dhbrown.com.
53.
Rangan, R., and Jazbutis, G., 1999, “Implementation Dimensions of Enterprise PDM,” Lockheed Martin Mission Critical Enterprise Systems Symposium ’99, May 24–26, Orlando, Florida.
54.
Trinkwitz, G., 2000, “Re-Engineering the Product Definition Process,” SIEMENS AG, D.H. Brown Implementation Roadmap 2000 Conference, Chicago, October, Presentations available through www.dhbrown.com.
55.
Fine, Charles, 1998, Clockspeed—Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage, Perseus Books, Reading, MA.
56.
Rangan, R., 2000, “Process Driven Solutions for Collaborative Commerce,” Product Sight Corporation, D.H. Brown Implementation Roadmap 2000 Conference, Chicago, October, Presentations available through www.dhbrown.com.
57.
Batini
,
C.
,
Lenzerini
,
M.
,
Navathe
,
S. B.
,
1986
, “
A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Datbase Schema Integration
,”
ACM Comput. Surv.
,
18
, No.
4
, December, pp.
323
364
.
58.
Senge, P. M., et al., 1994, The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook, Currency Doubleday, New York.
59.
Perrow, C., 1984, Normal Accidents, Basic Books, New York.
60.
Chadha, B., and Welsh, J., 2000, “Architecture Concepts for Simulation-based Acquisition of Complex Systems,” Summer Computer Simulation Conference, July.
61.
Coveney, P., and Highfield, R., 1995, Frontiers of Complexity, Ballantine Books.
62.
Chadha, B., 1997, “A Federated PIM for Supply Chains,” D.H. Brown Symposium.
63.
Koch, C., 1997, “Crossing No Man’s Land,” CIO Magazine, Dec.
64.
Clippinger, J. H., 1999, Order from the Bottom Up: Complex Adaptive Systems and Their Management, in The Biology of Business, Jossey-Bass California.
65.
Waldo, J., 1999, “The JINI Architecture for Network Centric Computing,” Commun. ACM, July.
66.
Kaufmann, S., 1995, At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, Oxford University Press, New York.
67.
Kelly, K., 1998, New Rules for the New Economy, Viking, New York.
68.
Holland, J. H., 1998, Emergence: From Chaos to Order, Perseus Books, Reading, MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.