Structure sharing means fulfilment of several functions or functional properties by the same physical structure, and is an important concept in product design. However, few guidelines and methods for supporting structure sharing, especially on computers, are currently available. The aim of this paper is to present a new, computational approach, for supporting structure sharing in design, that can automatically create, and offer designers for evaluation, a variety of alternative solution principles as well as their potential, minimal, qualitative embodiments that can fulfil a given intended sensor functionality. These potential alternatives are structure-shared where possible.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
product design, design for manufacture, industrial engineering
Topics:
Databases, Design, Product design, Sensors, Computers, Crystals, Capacitance
1.
Ulrich, K., 1988, “Computational and Pre-Parametric Design,” PhD Thesis, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT Cambridge.
2.
French, M., 1992, Form, Function And Mechanism, McMillan, London, pp. 11–13.
3.
Whitney
,
D.
,
1996
, “
Why Mechanical Designs Cannot be Like VLSI Design
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
8
, pp.
125
–
138
.
4.
Chakrabarti, A., 2001, “Sharing in Design: Categories, Importance and Issues,” Proc. Intl. Conf. on Eng. Design (ICED01), pp. 563–570, Glasgow.
5.
Sessler, G. M., 1994, “Silicon Microphones,” Proc. 27th Meeting Acoustical Society of America, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
6.
Chakrabarti, A., Johnson, A., and Kiriyama, T., 1997, “An Approach to Automated Synthesis of Solution Principles for Micro-Sensor Designs,” Proc. Intl. Conf. on Eng. Design, Tampere, 2, pp. 125–128.
7.
Chakrabarti, A., and Johnson, A. L., 1999, “Detecting Side Effects in Solution Principles,” Proc. Intl. Conf. on Eng. Design, Munich, 2, pp. 661–666.
8.
Chakrabarti, A., and Regno, R., 2001, “A New Approach to Structure Sharing,” Proc. Intl. Conf. on Eng. Design, pp. 155–162, Glasgow.
9.
Chakrabarti, A., 1991, “Designing by Functions,” Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge.
10.
Chaplin, R. V., Li, M., Oh, V. K., Sharpe, J. E. E., and Yan, X. T. 1994, “Integrated Computer Support for Inter-Disciplinary System Design,” Proc. AI in Design Conf., J. Gero, and F. Sudweeks, Eds., Kluwer Academic, Doredrecht.
11.
Sushkov, V., Alberts, L., and Mars, N. J. I., 1996, “Innovative Design Based on Sharable Physical Knowledge,” J. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (Eds), Proc. AI in Design Conf., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 723–742.
12.
Zavbi, R., and Duhovnik, J., 1997, “Prescriptive Model With Explicit Use of Physical Laws,” Proc. Intl. Conf. on Eng. Design (ICED97), Tampere, pp. 37–44.
13.
Zavbi, R., and Duhovnik, J., 2000, “The Problems of Transition from Basic Schematics to a Schematic of a Technical System,” Proc. Intl. Design Conf.-Design 2000, Dubrovnik, pp. 67–72.
14.
Welch
,
R. V.
, and
Dixon
,
J. R.
,
1994
, “
Guiding Conceptual Design Through Behavioral Reasoning
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
6
(
3
), pp.
169
–
188
.
15.
Williams, B. C., 1989, “Invention from First Principles Via Topologies of Interaction,” PhD Thesis, MIT, Cambridge.
16.
Roth, K., 1970, “Systematik Der Machinen Und Ihrer Mechanischen Elementaren, Funktionen,” Feinwerktechnik, 74, pp. 453–460.
17.
Agarwal, M., and Cagan, J., 1999, “Systematic Form and Function Design of MEMS Resonators Using Shape Grammars,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Eng. Design, Munich, 2, pp. 823–828.
18.
Hammond, K. J., 1986, “CHEF: A Model of Case Based Planning,” Proc. AAAI-86, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 267–271.
19.
Pu, P., and Purvis, L., 1994, “Formalizing Case Adaptation in a Case Based Design System,” Proc. AI in Design Conf., J. S. Gero & F. Sudweeks, Eds., Kluwer Academic, Doredrecht, pp. 77–91.
20.
Andreasen, M. M., Hansen, C. T., and Mortenssen, N. H., 1996, “The Structuring of Products and Product Programmes,” Proc. 2nd WDK Workshop on Product Structuring, M. Tichem, T. Storm, M. M. Andreasen and K. J. MacCallum eds., TU Delft, Netherlands.
21.
Hansen, C. T., 1997, “Towards a Tool for Computer Supported Structuring of Products,” Proc. Intl. Conf. on Eng. Design, Tampere, 2, pp. 71–76.
22.
Ringstad, P., 1999, “The Transition Between Concept and Layout—Early Component Design,” Proc. Intl. Conf. on Eng. Design, Munich, 2, pp. 1171–1174.
23.
Fricke, G., 1992, “Experimental Investigation of Individual Processes in Engineering Design,” Proc. Research in Design Thinking, N. Cross, K. Dorst and N. F. M. Roozenburg, eds., Delft University Press, Delft, pp. 105–109.
24.
Bentley, J. P., 1983, Principles of Measurement Systems, Longman, NY.
25.
Cooper, W. D., and Helfrick, A. D., 1985, Electronic Instrumentation and Measurement Techniques, Prentice-Hall international, New Jersey.
26.
Sydenham, P., 1985, Transducer In Measurement and Control, Adam Hilger, Bristol.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.