Magnetorheological dampers are intrinsically nonlinear devices, which make the modeling and design of a suitable control algorithm an interesting and challenging task. To evaluate the potential of magnetorheological (MR) dampers in control applications and to take full advantages of its unique features, a mathematical model to accurately reproduce its dynamic behavior has to be developed and then a proper control strategy has to be taken that is implementable and can fully utilize their capabilities as a semi-active control device. The present paper focuses on both the aspects. First, the paper reports the testing of a magnetorheological damper with an universal testing machine, for a set of frequency, amplitude, and current. A modified Bouc–Wen model considering the amplitude and input current dependence of the damper parameters has been proposed. It has been shown that the damper response can be satisfactorily predicted with this model. Second, a backstepping based nonlinear current monitoring of magnetorheological dampers for semi-active control of structures under earthquakes has been developed. It provides a stable nonlinear magnetorheological damper current monitoring directly based on system feedback such that current change in magnetorheological damper is gradual. Unlike other MR damper control techniques available in literature, the main advantage of the proposed technique lies in its current input prediction directly based on system feedback and smooth update of input current. Furthermore, while developing the proposed semi-active algorithm, the dynamics of the supplied and commanded current to the damper has been considered. The efficiency of the proposed technique has been shown taking a base isolated three story building under a set of seismic excitation. Comparison with widely used clipped-optimal strategy has also been shown.

1.
Soong
,
T. T.
, and
Dargush
,
G. F.
, 1997,
Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering
,
Wiley
,
England
.
2.
Soong
,
T.
, and
Spencer
,
B.
, 2002, “
Supplemental Energy Dissipation: State of the Art and State of the Practice
,”
Eng. Struct.
0141-0296,
24
, pp.
243
259
.
3.
Ginder
,
J. M.
,
Davis
,
L.
, and
Elie
,
L.
, 1996, “
Rheology of Magnetorheological Fluids: Models and Measurements
,”
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
0217-9792,
10
, pp.
3293
3303
.
4.
Dyke
,
S.
, and
Spencer
,
B.
, 1997, “
A Comparison of Semi-Active Control Strategies for the MR Damper
,”
Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference, Intelligent Information Systems
, Bahamas.
5.
Dyke
,
S.
,
Spencer
,
B.
,
Sain
,
M.
, and
Carlson
,
J.
, 1996, “
Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
5
, pp.
565
575
.
6.
Yi
,
K.
, and
Song
,
B. S.
, 1999, “
A New Adaptive Sky-Hook Control of Vehicle Semi-Active Suspensions
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D (J. Automob. Eng.)
0954-4070,
213
(
3
), pp.
293
303
.
7.
Zhou
,
L.
,
Chang
,
C.
, and
Wang
,
L.
, 2003, “
Adaptive Fuzzy Control for Nonlinear Building Magnetorheological Damper System
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
0733-9445,
129
, pp.
905
913
.
8.
Liu
,
M.
,
Song
,
G.
, and
Li
,
H.
, 2007, “
Non-Model-Based Semi-Active Vibration Suppression of Stay Cables Using Magneto-Rheological Fluid Dampers
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
16
, pp.
1447
1452
.
9.
Karnopp
,
D.
,
Crosby
,
M.
, and
Harwood
,
R.
, 1974, “
Vibration Control Using Semi-Active Force Generators
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
96
, pp.
619
626
. 0022-0817
10.
Yang
,
G.
,
Spencer
,
B.
,
Jung
,
H. H.
, and
Carlson
,
J. D. J.
, 2004, “
Dynamic Modeling of Large-Scale Magnetorheological Damper Systems for Civil Engineering Applications
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
0733-9399,
130
, pp.
1107
1114
.
11.
Wereley
,
N.
, and
Pang
,
L.
, 1998, “
Nondimensional Analysis of Semi-Active Electrorheological and Magnetorheological Dampers Using Approximate Parallel Plate Models
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
7
, pp.
732
743
.
12.
2007, LORD®, LORD Technical Data: RD-1005 Damper, LORD Corporation, URL: http://www.lordfulfillment.com/upload/DS7017.pdfhttp://www.lordfulfillment.com/upload/DS7017.pdf.
13.
Spencer
,
B. F.
, Jr.
,
Dyke
,
S. J.
,
Sain
,
M. K.
, and
Carlson
,
J. D.
, 1997, “
Phenomenological Model for Magnetorheological Dampers
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
0733-9399,
123
, pp.
230
238
.
14.
Ehrgott
,
R.
, and
Masri
,
S.
, 1992, “
Modeling the Oscillatory Dynamic Behavior of Electrorheological Materials in Shear
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
1
, pp.
275
285
.
15.
Makris
,
N.
, and
Dargush
,
G.
, 1994, “
Generalized Boundary Element Formulation for Dynamic Analysis of Viscoelastic System
,”
Proceedings of the First World Conference on Structural Control
, 3–5 August 1994, Pasadena CA, pp.
73
81
.
16.
Kamath
,
G.
,
Hurt
,
H.
, and
Wereley
,
N.
, 1996, “
Analysis and Testing of Bingham Plastic Behavior in Semi-Active Electrorheological Fluid Dampers
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
5
, pp.
576
590
.
17.
Kamath
,
G.
, and
Wereley
,
N.
, 1997, “
Nonlinear Viscoelastic-Plastic Mechanisms Based Model of an Electrorheological Damper
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
20
, pp.
1125
1132
.
18.
Li
,
W. H.
,
Yao
,
G. Z.
,
Chen
,
G.
,
Yeo
,
S. H.
, and
Yap
,
F. F.
, 2000, “
Testing and Steady State Modeling of a Linear MR Damper Under Sinusoidal Loading
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
9
, pp.
95
102
.
19.
Vavreck
,
A. N.
, 2002, “
Single-Stage Magnetorheological Damper Parameter Estimation
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
11
, pp.
596
598
. 0964-1726
20.
Dominguez
,
A.
,
Sedaghati
,
R.
, and
Stiharu
,
I.
, 2004, “
Modelling the Hysteresis Phenomenon of Magnetorheological Dampers
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
13
, pp.
1351
1361
.
21.
Dominguez
,
A.
,
Sedaghati
,
R.
, and
Stiharu
,
I.
, 2006, “
A New Dynamic Hysteresis Model for Magnetorheological Dampers
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
0964-1726,
15
, pp.
1179
1189
.
22.
Feng
,
Q.
, and
Shinozuka
,
M.
, 1990, “
Use of a Variable Damper for Hybrid Control of Bridge Response Under Earthquake
,”
Proceedings of the U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research
, edited by
G.
Housner
and
S.
Masri
,
University of Southern California
,
Los Angeles, CA
, pp.
107
112
.
23.
Leitmann
,
G.
, 1994, “
Semi-Active Control for Vibration Attenuation
,”
J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.
1045-389X,
5
, pp.
841
846
.
24.
Inaudi
,
J.
, 1997, “
Modulated Homogeneous Friction: A Semi-Active Damping Strategy
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
0098-8847,
26
, pp.
361
376
.
25.
Jansen
,
L.
, and
Dyke
,
S.
, 2000, “
Semi-Active Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
0733-9399,
126
, pp.
795
803
.
26.
Nagarajaiah
,
S.
, and
Narasimhan
,
S.
, 2006, “
Smart Base Isolated Benchmark Building Part II: Phase I Sample Controllers for Linear Isolation System
,”
Struct. Control Health Monit.
,
13
, pp.
589
604
. 0733-9399
27.
Ali
,
S. F.
, and
Ramaswamy
,
A.
, 2008, “
GA Optimized FLC Driven Semi-Active Control for Phase II Smart Nonlinear Base Isolated Benchmark Building
,”
Struct. Control Health Monit.
,
15
, pp.
797
820
. 1545-2255
28.
Ni
,
Y.
,
Chen
,
Y.
,
Ko
,
J.
, and
Cao
,
D.
, 2002, “
Neuro-Control of Cable Vibration Using Semi-Active Magneto-Rheological Dampers
,”
Eng. Struct.
0141-0296,
24
, pp.
295
307
.
29.
Kritic
,
M.
,
Kanellakopoulos
,
I.
, and
Kokotovic
,
P.
, 1995,
Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
30.
Marquez
,
H.
, 2003,
Nonlinear Control Systems Analysis and Design
,
Wiley Interscience
,
Hoboken, New Jersey
.
31.
Chopra
,
A.
, 2005,
Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering
,
Pearson Education
,
New Delhi, India
.
32.
Naeim
,
F.
, and
Kelly
,
J.
, 1999,
Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.