There are two axioms applicable to this paper: the first is that no flowmeter can be more accurate than the laboratory which calibrated it; the second that no uncalibrated flowmeter can be more accurate than a like one that is calibrated in a recognized standards laboratory. The fundamental systematic uncertainty in flow measurement is that inherited from the flow calibration laboratory. This paper focuses on ascertaining this fundamental systematic uncertainty by deriving from the published instances of interlaboratory comparisons a value in which one may be 95 percent confident. For water flow measurements, this value turns out to be ±0.28 percent, and for liquid hydrocarbon fuels it is ±0.77 percent. Cold water calibrations are the most accurate.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Calibration, Flow (Dynamics), Uncertainty, Flow measurement, Flowmeters, Water, Fuels
1.
Albert, P. G., Sumner, W. J., and Halmi, D., “A Primary Flow Section for Use with the Alternative ASME Acceptance Test,” ASME paper 82-JPGC-PTC-4.
2.
Bean, H. S., Beitler, S. R., and Sprenkle, R. E., 1941, “Discharge Coefficients of Long-Radius Nozzles When Used With Pipe-Wall Pressure Taps,” Trans. ASME, pp. 439–445.
3.
Benedict, R. P., and Wyler, J. S., 1979, “Engineering Statistics-with Particular Reference to Performance Test Code Work,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Power.
4.
Brown, T. M. “Comparison of ASME Flow Nozzle Calibrations,” Private Correspondence.
5.
Brunkalla, R. 1985, “Effects of Fabrication Technique on the Discharge Coefficient of a Throat Tap Nozzle” ASME Paper 85-JPGC-PTC-3.
6.
Cotton, K. C., and Westcott, J. C, 1960, “Throat Tap Nozzles used for Accurate Flow Measurements,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Power, Oct., pp. 247–263.
7.
Clay, C. A. E., Griffiths, C., and Spencer, E. A., 1981, “Improving the Confidence in Hydraulic Laboratory Calibrations,” Flow, Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, Vol. 2, Durgin. W. W., ed. Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, pp. 789–808.
8.
Keyser, D. R., 1996, “How Accurate are Flow Calibrations Anyway?” Proceedings of the 1996 International Joint Power Generation Conference, PWR Vol. 30, Vol. 2, ASME H01077, pp. 131–138.
9.
Levie, S. A., Clay, C. A. E., Miller R. W., Spencer, E. A., and Upp, I. 1978, Flow Measurement of Fluids, Dijstelbergen, H. H. and Spencer, E. A. eds., North-Holland Publisher, pp. 253–265.
10.
Mattingly, G. E., 1988, “A Round Robin Flow Measurement Testing Program Using Hydrocarbon Liquids: Results for First Phase Testing,” Sept., NISTIR 88-4013, Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
11.
Spencer, A., and Neale, L. 1974, “The Reliability of Test Data from Flow Measurement Calibration Laboratories,” Flow, Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, Flow Benchmarks: Principles, Dowdell, R. B. ed., Instrument Society of America, Pittsburgh, PA., pp. 1255–1266.
12.
Wyler, J., and Benedict, R. P., 1974, “Comparisons between Throat and Pipe Wall Tap Nozzles,” ASME Paper 74-WA/FM-3.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.