A new pressure, volume, temperature, and time (PVTt) primary gas flow standard for calibrating flowmeters has an expanded uncertainty k=2 of between 0.02% and 0.05%. The standard diverts a steady flow into a collection tank of known volume during a measured time interval. The standard spans the flow range of 1 slm1 to 2000 slm using two collection tanks (34 L and 677 L) and two flow diversion systems. We describe the novel features of the standard and analyze its uncertainty. The thermostatted collection tank allows determination of the average gas temperature to 7 mK (0.0023%) within an equilibration time of 20 min. We developed a mass cancellation procedure that reduced the uncertainty contributions from the inventory volume to 0.017% at the highest flow rate. Flows were independently measured throughout the overlapping flow range of the two systems and they agreed within 0.015 %. The larger collection system was evaluated at high flows by comparing single and double diversions; the maximum difference was 0.0075%.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
measurement standards, flow measurement, calibration, flowmeters
Topics:
Flow (Dynamics), Pressure, Temperature, Uncertainty, Density, Flow measurement, Gas flow
1.
Berg, R., Green, D., and Mattingly, G., 2000, Semiconductor Measurement Technology: Workshop on Mass Flow Measurement and Control for the Semiconductor Industry, NIST Special Publication 400-101, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gasunie, Gaithersburg, MD, p. 17.
2.
Wright, J., 2003, “What is the ‘Best’ Transfer Standard for Gas Flow?” Proceedings of FLOMEKO, Groningen, The Netherlands.
3.
Olsen, L., and Baumgarten, G., 1971, “Gas Flow Measurement by Collection Time and Density in a Constant Volume,” Flow: Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park, NC, pp. 1287–1295.
4.
Kegel, T., 1995, “Uncertainty Analysis of a Volumetric Primary Standard for Compressible Flow Measurement,” Proceedings of Flow Measurement 3rd International Symposium, San Antonio, TX, Colorado Engineering Experiment Station, Nunn, Co.
5.
Ishibashi, M., Takamoto, M., and Watanabe, N., 1985, “New System for the Pressurized Gas Flow Standard in Japan,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Fluid Flow Measurements, American Gas Association.
6.
Wright, J., 2001, “Laboratory Primary Standards in Flow Measurement,” Flow Measurement: Practical Guides for Measurement and Control, 2nd Ed., D. W. Spitzer ed., The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park, NC, pp. 731–760.
7.
Wright
,
J.
,
Johnson
,
A.
, and
Moldover
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Design and Uncertainty Analysis for a PVTt Gas Flow Standard
,”
J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol.
,
108
, pp.
21
–
47
.
8.
Wright, J., and Johnson, A., 2000, “Uncertainty in Primary Gas Flow Standards Due to Flow Work Phenomena,” Proceedings of FLOMEKO, Salvador, Brazil, Institute for Technological Research, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
9.
Carslaw, H., and Jaeger, J., 1946, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd Ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 198–201.
10.
Jaeger, J., and Davis, R., 1984, A Primer for Mass Metrology, NBS Special Publication 700-1, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, p. 22.
11.
Lemmon, E., McLinden, M., and Huber, M., 2002, Refprop 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties, NIST Standard Reference Database 23, Version 7.0, 7/30/02, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO.
12.
International Organization for Standardization, 1996, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, Switzerland.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.