This paper investigates the performance of the popular k-ω and SST turbulence models for the two-dimensional flow past the flat plate at shallow angles of incidence. Particular interest is paid to the leading edge bubble that forms as the flow separates from the sharp leading edge. This type of leading edge bubble is most commonly found in flows past thin airfoils, such as turbine blades, membrane wings, and yacht sails. Validation is carried out through a comparison to wind tunnel results compiled by Crompton (2001, “The Thin Aerofoil Leading Edge Bubble,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol). This flow problem presents a new and demanding test case for turbulence models. The models were found to capture the leading edge bubble well with the Shear-Stress Transport (SST) model predicting the reattachment length within 7% of the experimental values. Downstream of reattachment both models predicted a slower boundary layer recovery than the experimental results. Overall, despite their simplicity, these two-equation models do a surprisingly good job for this demanding test case.

Issue Section:
Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows
Keywords:
bubbles, turbulence, turbulence, leading edge bubble, computational fluid dynamics
Topics:
Boundary layers, Bubbles, Flow (Dynamics), Turbulence, Flat plates, Computational fluid dynamics, Shear (Mechanics), Kinetic energy
1.
Crompton
,
M. J.
, 2001, “
The Thin Aerofoil Leading Edge Bubble
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol.
2.
Bardina
,
J. E.
,
Huang
,
P. G.
, and
Coakley
,
T. J.
, 1997, “
Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing and Development
,” NASA, Technical Report No. 110446.
3.
Collie
,
S.
, and
Gerritsen
,
M.
, 2006, “
The Challenging Turbulent Flows Past Downwind Yacht Sails and Practical Application of CFD to Them
,”
Second High Performance Yacht Design Conference
, Auckland.
4.
Gault
,
D. E.
, 1957, “
An Investigation at Low Speed of the Flow Over a Simulated Flat Plate at Small Angles of Attack Using Pitot Static and Hot-Wire Probes
,” NACA, Technical Report No. TN-3876.
5.
Driver
,
D. M.
,
Seegmiller
,
H. L.
, and
Marvin
,
J. G.
, 1987, “
Time-Dependent Behavior of a Reattaching Shear Layer
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
25
(
7
), pp.
914
–
919
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
Driver
,
D. M.
, and
Seegmiller
,
H. L.
, 1985, “
Features of a Reattaching Turbulent Shear Layer in Divergent Channel Flow
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
23
(
2
), pp.
163
–
171
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
Menter
,
F. R.
, 1992, “
Improved Two-Equation k-ω Turbulence Models For Aerodynamic Flows
,” NASA, Technical Report No. TM-103975.
8.
Crabtree
,
L. F.
, 1957, “
The Formation of Regions of Separated Flow on Wing Surfaces
,”
Aeronautical Research Council
, London, Technical Report No. R&M-3122.
9.
Newman
,
B. G.
, and
Tse
,
M.-C.
, 1992, “
Incompressible Flow Past a Flat Plate Aerofoil With Leading Edge Separation Bubble
,”
Aeronaut. J.
0001-9240,
96
, pp.
57
–
64
.
10.
Cherry
,
N. J.
,
Hiller
,
R.
, and
Latour
,
M. E. M. P.
, 1983, “
The Unsteady Structure of Two-Dimensional Separated-and-Reattaching Flows
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
11
, pp.
95
–
105
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
Kiya
,
M.
, and
Sasaki
,
K.
, 1983, “
Structure of a Turbulent Separation Bubble
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
137
, pp.
83
–
112
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
CFX-International
2003, CFX-5 Solver and Solver Manager Version 5.6, CFX-International.
13.
Raw
,
M.
, 1996, “
Robustness of Coupled Algebraic Multigrid for the Navier-Stokes Equations
,”
34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
, AIAA Paper No. 96-0297.
14.
Menter
,
F. R.
, 1994, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models For Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
–
1605
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
, 1988, “
Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
26
(
11
), pp.
1299
–
1310
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
ICEM-CFD-Engineering
, “
ICEM HEXA 4.2
,” http://www.icemcfd.com/http://www.icemcfd.com/
17.
Österlund
,
J.
, 1999, “
Experimental Studies of Zero Pressure-Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow
,” Ph.D. thesis, Kungl Tekniska Högskolan.
18.
Horton
,
H. R.
, 1969, “
A Semi-Empirical Theory for the Growth and Bursting of Laminar Separation Bubbles
,”
Aeronautical Research Council
, London, Technical Report No. ARC CP-1073.
19.
So
,
R. M. C.
, and
Lai
,
Y. G.
, 1988, “
Low-Reynolds-Number Modeling of Flows Over a Backward Facing Step
,”
ZAMP
0044-2275,
39
, pp.
13
–
27
.
20.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
, 1998,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
, 2nd ed.,
Griffin
,
California
.
21.
Weller
,
H.
,
Tabor
,
G.
,
Jasak
,
H.
, and
Fureby
,
C.
, 1998, “
A Tensorial Approach to Computational Continuum Mechanics Using Object Orientated Techniques
,”
Comput. Phys.
0894-1866,
12
(
6
), pp.
620
–
631
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
22.
Sampaio
,
L. E. B.
,
Nieckele
,
A. O.
,
Gerritsen
,
M.
, and
Collie
,
S.
, 2006, “
Numerical Simulations of the Long Recirculation Bubbles Formed in Thin Flat Plates at Shallow Incidence
,”
Proceedings of the EPTT 2006, Escola de Primavera de Transicao e Turbulencia, ABCM
,
Brazil Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering—ABCM
,
Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
.
23.
Issa
,
R.
, 1985, “
Solution of the Implicit Discretized Fluid Flow Equations by Operator-Splitting
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
62
, pp.
40
–
65
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
24.
Horiuti
,
K.
, 1985, “
Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Channel Flow by One-Equation Modeling
,”
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
0031-9015,
54
(
8
), pp.
2855
–
2865
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
25.
Sampaio
,
L. E. B.
, 2006, “
Large Eddy Simulations of the Thin Plate Separation Bubble at Shallow Incidence
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, in Portuguese.
Copyright © 2008
 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.