Characteristics of a reversible-pump turbine have been measured with five different leading edge profiles in turbine mode. These profiles varied the inlet blade angle and the radius of curvature. Further geometry parameters have been investigated through numerical simulations. The pump turbine tested has much steeper flow-speed characteristics than a comparable Francis turbine. The most obvious geometry difference is the inlet part of the runner blades, where the blade angle for the pump turbine is much smaller than for the Francis turbine. Two different blade angles have been tested on a physical model and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been performed on four different angles. Both methods show that a smaller blade angle gives less steep characteristics in turbine mode, whereas the measured s-shape in turbine brake- and turbine pumping mode gets more exaggerated. Long-radius leading edges result in less steep characteristics. The unstable pump turbine characteristics are in the literature shown to be a result of vortex formation in the runner and guide vane channels. A leading edge with longer curvature radius moves the formation of vortices towards higher speed of rotation.

References

1.
Pejovic
,
S.
,
Krsmanovic
,
L.
,
Jemcov
,
R.
, and
Crnkovic
,
P.
,
1976
, “
Unstable Operation of High-Head Reversible Pump-Turbines
,”
8th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation
,
Leningrad, USSR
, pp.
283
295
.
2.
Dörfler
,
P. K.
,
Engineer
,
A. J.
,
Pendse
,
R. N.
,
Huvet
,
P.
, and
Brahme
,
M. V.
,
1998
, “
Stable Operation Achieved on a Single-Stage Reversible Pump-Turbine Showing Instability at No-Load
,”
19th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation
,
Singapore
.
3.
Klemm
,
D.
,
1982
, “
Stabilisierung der Kennlinien einer Pumpenturbine im Bereich zwischen Turbinen-Teillast und Rückwärtspumpenbetrieb
,”
Voith Forschung und Konstruktion
,
28
(
2
), pp.
2.1
2.7
.
4.
Apfelbacher
,
R.
, and
Etzold
,
F.
,
1988
, “
Energy-Saving, Shock-Free Throttling With the Aid of a Reverse Running Centrifugal Pump
,”
KSB Technische Berichte, Frankenthal
,
24e
(
68
), pp.
33
41
.
5.
Martin
,
C. S.
,
1986
, “
Stability of Pump-Turbines During Transient Operations
,”
5th International Conference on Pressure Surges, BHRA
,
Hanover, Germany
.
6.
Olimstad
,
G.
,
Børresen
,
B.
, and
Nielsen
,
T. K.
,
2012
, “
Geometry Impact on Pump-Turbine Characteristics
,”
14th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machine
,
Honolulu, HI
.
7.
Nielsen
,
T. K.
, and
Olimstad
,
G.
,
2010
, “
Dynamic Behaviour of Reversible Pump-Turbines in Turbine Mode of Operation
,”
13th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machine
,
Honolulu, HI
.
8.
Widmer
,
C.
,
Staubli
,
T.
, and
Ledergerber
,
N.
,
2011
, “
Unstable Characteristics and Rotating Stall in Turbine Brake Operation of Pump-Turbines
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
133
(
4
), p.
041101
.10.1115/1.4003874
9.
Hasmatuchi
,
V.
,
Farhat
,
M.
,
Roth
,
S.
,
Botero
,
F.
, and
Avellan
,
F.
,
2011
, “
Experimental Evidence of Rotating Stall in a Pump-Turbine at Off-Design Conditions in Generating Mode
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
133
(5), p.
051104
10.1115/1.4004088.
10.
International Electrotechnical Commission
,
1999
, “
Hydraulic Turbines, Storage Pumps and Pump-Turbines—Model Acceptance Tests
,” Standard No. IEC 60193.
11.
Staubli
,
T.
,
Senn
,
F.
, and
Sallaberger
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Instability of Pump-Turbines During Start-Up in the Turbine Mode
,”
Hydro 2008
,
Ljubljana, Slovenia
, Paper No. 9.6.
12.
Olimstad
,
G.
,
Børresen
,
B.
, and
Nielsen
,
T. K.
,
2012
, “
A Two Dimensional Model for Pump-Turbine Instability Investigation
,”
14th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machine
,
Honolulu, HI
.
13.
Yamabe
,
M.
,
1972
, “
Improvement of Hysteresis Characteristics of Francis Pump-Turbines When Operated as Turbine
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
,
94
(
3
), pp.
581
585
.10.1115/1.3425495
14.
Senoo
,
Y.
, and
Yamaguchi
,
M.
,
1987
, “
A Study on Unstable S-Shaped Characteristic Curves of Pump Turbines at No-Flow
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
109
(
1
), pp.
77
82
.10.1115/1.3262073
You do not currently have access to this content.