Calculations of the performance of modern gas turbines usually include allowance for cooling air flow rate; assumptions are made for the amount of the cooling air bled from the compressor, as a fraction of the mainstream flow, but this fractional figure is often set in relatively arbitrary fashion. There are two essential effects of turbine blade cooling: (i) the reduction of the gas stagnation temperature at exit from the combustion chamber (entry to the first nozzle row) to a lower stagnation temperature at entry to the first rotor and (ii) a pressure loss resulting from mixing the cooling air with the mainstream. Similar effects occur in the following cooled blade rows. The paper reviews established methods for determining the amount of cooling air required and semi-empirical relations, for film cooled blading with thermal barrier coatings, are derived. Similarly, the pressure losses related to elements of cooling air leaving at various points round the blade surface are integrated over the whole blade. This gives another semi-empirical expression, this time for the complete mixing pressure loss in the blade row, as a function of the total cooling air used. These two relationships are then used in comprehensive calculations of the performance of a simple open-cycle gas turbine. for varying combustion temperature and pressure ratio. These calculations suggest that for maximum plant efficiency there may be a limiting combustion temperature (below that which would be set by stoichiometric combustion). For a given combustion temperature, the optimum pressure ratio is reduced by the effect of cooling air.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Advanced Energy Systems
Keywords:
gas turbines, performance evaluation, cooling, combustion, heat engines
Topics:
Cooling, Flow (Dynamics), Pressure, Temperature, Cycles, Blades, Combustion, Gas turbines, Film cooling
1.
Mukherjee, D. K., 1976, “Design of Turbines, Using Distributed or Average Losses; Effect of Blading,” AGARD 195, pp. 8–1–8–13.
2.
Walsh, P. P., and Fletcher, P., 1998, Gas Turbine Performance, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
3.
Watson, D. W., and Ritchey, I., 1997, “Thermodynamic Analysis of Closed Loop Cycles,” ASME paper no. 97-GT-288.
4.
Traupel, W., 1966, Thermische Turbomaschinen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
5.
Hawthorne, W. R., 1956, “The Thermodynamics of Cooled Turbines,” Parts I and II, Proceedings of the ASME, Vol. 78, pp. 1765, 1781.
6.
El-Masri
,
M. A.
,
1986
, “
On Thermodynamics of Gas Turbine Cycles—Part II: Model for Expansion in Cooled Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
108
, pp.
151
–
159
.
7.
Bolland
,
O.
, and
Stadhaas
,
J. F.
,
1995
, “
Comparative Evaluation of Combined Cycle and Gas Turbine Systems With Water Injection, Steam Injection and Recuperation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
117
, pp.
138
–
147
.
8.
El-Masri
,
M. A.
,
1987
, “
Exergy Analysis of Combined Cycles—Part I: Air-Cooled Brayton-Cycle Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
109
, pp.
228
–
235
.
9.
Brown
,
A.
,
Jubran
,
B. A.
, and
Martin
,
B. W.
,
1993
, “
Coolant Optimization of a Gas Turbine Engine
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A: Jrnl. of Power and Energy
,
207
, pp.
31
–
47
.
10.
El-Masri
,
M. A.
,
1988
, “
GASCAN—An Interactive Code for Thermal Analysis of Gas Turbine Systems
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
110
, pp.
201
–
209
.
11.
Chiesa, P., Consonni, S., Lozza, G., and Macchi, E., 1993, “Predicting the Ultimate Performance of Advanced Power Cycles Based on Very High Temperatures,” ASME paper no. 93-GT-223.
12.
El-Masri, M. A., 1997, private communication.
13.
MacArthur, C. D., 1999, Advanced Aero-engine Turbine Technologies and Their Application to Industrial Gas Turbines,” 14th International Symposium on Air-Breathing Engines, Florence, Italy, ISABE Paper No. 99-7151.
14.
Young, J. B., 1998, “Computer-Based Project on Combined-Cycle Power Generation,” Cambridge University Internal Report.
15.
Ainley, D. G., 1957, “Internal Cooling for Turbine Blades,” Aeronautical Research Council R and M 3013.
16.
Horlock, J. H., 1966, Axial Flow Turbines, Butterworth, London.
17.
Holland
,
M. J.
, and
Thake
,
T. F.
,
1980
, “
Rotor Blade Cooling in High Pressure Turbines
,”
AIAA J. of Aircraft
,
17
, No.
6
, pp.
412
–
418
.
18.
De Ruyck, J., Bram, S., and Allard, G., 1996, “Revap Cycle: a New Evaporative Cycle Without Saturation Tower,” ASME paper no. 96-GT-361.
19.
Lakshminarayana, B. L., 1996, Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer in Turbomachinery, John Wiley and Sons, New York, Chapter 7.
20.
Jones, T. V., 1991, “Definitions of Heat Transfer Coefficients in the Turbine Situation,” Turbomachinery—Latest Developments in a Changing Scene, ASME paper no. C 423/046.
21.
Kays, W. M., and Crawford, M. E., 1993, Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
22.
Hartsel, J. E., 1972, “Prediction of Effects of Mass-Transfer Cooling on the Blade-Row Efficiency of Turbine Airfoils,” AIAA Paper 72-11.
23.
Shapiro, A. H., 1953, The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Ronald Press, New York.
24.
Shrivastava, K. D., and Maccallum, N. R. L., 1987, “The Effect of a Transversely Injected Stream on the Flow Through Turbine Cascades—Part 1: Flow Effects,” ASME paper no. 77-GT-87.
25.
Shrivastava, K. D., and Maccallum, N. R. L., 1987, “The Effect of a Transversely Injected Stream on the Flow Through Turbine Cascades—Part II: Performance Changes,” ASME paper no. 87-GT-88.
26.
Day, C. R. B., Oldfield, M. L. G., and Lock, G. D., 1999, “Aerodynamic Performance of an Annular Cascade of Film Cooled Nozzle Guide Vanes Under Engine Representative Conditions,” Experiments in Fluids, in press.
27.
Hawthorne
,
W. R.
, and
Davis
,
G. de V.
,
1956
, “
Calculating Gas Turbine Performance
,”
Engng.
,
181
, p.
361
361
.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.