A practical consideration for implementing a real-time on-board engine component performance tracking system is the development of high fidelity engine models capable of providing a reference level from which performance changes can be trended. Real-time engine models made their advent as state variable models in the mid-1980s, which utilized a piecewise linear model that granted a reasonable representation of the engine during steady state operation and mild transients. Increased processor speeds over the next decade allowed more complex models to be considered, that were a combination of linear and nonlinear physics-based elements. While the latter provided greater fidelity over both transient operation and the engine operational flight envelope, these models could be further improved to provide the high level of accuracy required for long-term performance tracking, as well as address the issue of engine-to-engine variation. Over time, these models may deviate enough from the actual engine being monitored, as a result of improvements made during an engine’s life cycle such as hardware modifications, bleed and stator vane schedule alterations, cooling flow adjustments, and the like, that the module performance estimations are inaccurate and often misleading. The process described in this paper will address these shortcomings while maintaining the execution speed required for real-time implementation.

1.
Brotherton
,
T.
,
Volponi
,
A.
,
Luppold
,
R.
, and
Simon
,
D.
, 2003, “
eSTORM: Enhanced Self Tuning On-Board Real-Time Engine Model
,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, March, Paper No. 1023.
2.
Volponi
,
A.
, 2005, “
Use of Hybrid Engine Modeling for On-Board Module Performance Tracking
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68169.
3.
Urban
,
L. A.
, 1972, “
Gas Path Analysis Applied to Turbine Engine Conditioning Monitoring
,” AIAA/SAE Paper No. 72-1082.
4.
Urban
,
L. A.
, 1974, “
Parameter Selection for Multiple Fault Diagnostics of Gas Turbine Engines
,”
AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 165
.
5.
Volponi
,
A. J.
, and
Urban
,
L. A.
, 1992, “
Mathematical Methods of Relative Engine Performance Diagnostics
,”
SAE Tech. Pap. Ser.
0148-7191,
101
,
922048
.
6.
Doel
,
D. L.
, 1992, “
TEMPER - A Gas Path Analysis Tool for Commercial Jet Engines
,” ASME Paper No. 92-GT-315.
7.
Doel
,
D. L.
, 1993, “
An Assessment of Weighted-Least-Squares Based Gas Path Analysis
,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-119.
8.
Kobayashi
,
T.
, and
Simon
,
D. L.
, 2003, “
Application of a Bank of Kalman Filters for Aircraft Engine Fault Diagnostics
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2003-38550.
9.
Kanelopoulos
,
K.
,
Stamatis
,
A.
, and
Mathioudakis
,
K.
, 1997, “
Incorporating Neural Networks Into Gas Turbine Performance Diagnostics
,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-035.
10.
Romessis
,
C.
,
Stamatis
,
A.
, and
Mathioudakis
,
K.
, 2001, “
A Parametric Investigation of the Diagnostic Ability of Probabilistic Neural Networks on Turbofan Engines
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0011.
11.
Ganguli
,
R.
, 2003, “
Application of Fuzzy Logic for Fault Isolation of Jet Engines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
125
(
3
), pp.
617
623
.
12.
Sampath
,
S.
,
Galuti
,
A.
, and
Singh
,
R.
, 2002, “
Fault Diagnostics Using Genetic Algorithm for Advanced Cycle Gas Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30021.
13.
Singh
,
R.
, and
Sampath
,
S.
, 2004, “
An Integrated Fault Diagnostics Model Using Genetic Algorithm and Neural Networks
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53914.
14.
Luppold
,
R. H.
,
Gallops
,
G.
,
Roman
,
J.
, and
Kerr
,
L.
, 1989, “
Estimating In-Flight Engine Performance Variations Using Kalman Filter Concepts
,” AIAA Paper No. 89-2584.
15.
Volponi
,
A.
, and
Brotherton
,
T.
, 2005, “
A Bootstrap Data Methodology for Sequential Hybrid Engine Model Building
,”
2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings
, Big Sky, MT, March.
16.
Haykin
,
S.
, 1999,
Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
, 2nd ed.,
Prentice-Hall
, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
17.
Bisop
,
C. M.
, 1995,
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
,
Oxford University Press
, Oxford, U.K.
18.
Duda
,
R. O.
,
Hart
,
P. E.
, and
Stork
,
D. G.
, 2001,
Pattern Classification
, 2nd ed.,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
, New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.