A comprehensive experimental investigation was initiated to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of a gas turbine exhaust diffuser/collector for various strut geometries over a range of inlet angle. The test was conducted on a 1/12th scale rig developed for rapid and accurate evaluation of multiple test configurations. The facility was designed to run continuously at an inlet Mach number of 0.40 and an inlet hydraulic diameter-based Reynolds number of 3.4 × 105. Multihole pneumatic pressure probes and surface oil flow visualization were deployed to ascertain the effects of inlet flow angle and strut geometry. Initial baseline diffuser-only tests with struts omitted showed a weakly increasing trend in pressure recovery with increasing swirl, peaking at 14 deg before rapidly dropping. Tests on profiled struts showed a similar trend with reduced recovery across the range of swirl and increased recovery drop beyond the peak. Subsequent tests for a full diffuser/collector configuration with profiled struts revealed a rising trend at lower swirl when compared to diffuser-only results, albeit with a reduction in recovery. When tested without struts, the addition of the collector to the diffuser not only reduced the pressure recovery at all angles but also resulted in a shift of the overall characteristic to a peak recovery at a lower value of swirl. The increased operation range associated with the implementation of struts in the full configuration is attributed to the deswirling effects of the profiled struts. In this case, the decreased swirl reduces the flow asymmetry responsible for the reduction in pressure recovery attributed to the formation of a localized reverse-flow vortex near the bottom of the collector. This research indicates that strut setting angle and, to a lesser extent, strut shape can be optimized to provide peak engine performance over a wide range of operation.

References

1.
Sovran
,
G.
, and
Klomp
,
E. D.
,
1967
, “
Experimentally Determined Optimum Geometries for Rectillinear Diffusers With Rectangular, Conical or Annular Cross-Section
,”
Fluid Mechanics of Internal Flow
,
G.
Sovran
, ed.,
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
, pp.
270
312
.
2.
Lohmann
,
P.
,
Markowski
,
S. J.
, and
Brookman
,
E. T.
,
1979
, “
Swirling Flow Through Annular Diffuses With Conical Walls
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
101
(
2
), pp.
224
229
.
3.
Kumar
,
D. S.
, and
Kumar
,
K. L.
,
1980
, “
Effect of Swirl on Pressure Recovery in Annular Diffusers
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
22
(
6
), pp.
305
313
.
4.
Vassiliev
,
V.
,
Irmisch
,
S.
,
Claridge
,
M.
, and
Richardson
,
D. P.
,
2003
, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Impact of Swirl on the Performance of Industrial Gas Turbines Exhaust Diffusers
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38424.
5.
Pietrasch
,
R. Z.
, and
Seume
,
J. R.
,
2005
, “
Interaction Between Struts and Swirl Flow in Gas Turbine Exhaust Diffusers
,”
ASME J. Thermal Sci.
,
14
(
4
), pp.
314
320
.
6.
Goudkov
,
E. I.
,
Nikolaev
,
M. A.
,
Ris
,
V. V.
,
Smirnov
,
E. M.
, and
Tajc
,
L.
,
2003
. “
Influence of Tip-Clearance Jet Leakage on Efficiency of Working Fluid Injection Into the Diffuser as Applied for Reduction of Exhaust Hood Case
,”
5th European Conference on Turbomachinery
, pp.
761
770
.
7.
Guillot
,
S.
,
Ng
,
W. F.
,
Hamm
,
H. D.
,
Stang
,
U. E.
, and
Lowe
,
K. T.
,
2014
, “
The Experimental Studies of Improving the Aerodynamic Performance of a Turbine Exhaust System
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25481.
8.
Roach
,
P. E.
,
1987
, “
The Generation of Nearly Isotropic Turbulence by Means of Grids
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
8
(
2
), pp.
82
92
.
9.
Aeroprobe
,
2006
, “
Multi-Hole Probe User's Manual for 5-Hole and 7-Hole Probes
,” Vol.
1.21
,
Aeroprobe Corp.
,
Christiansburg, VA
.
10.
Boehm
,
B. P.
,
2012
, “
Performance Optimization of a Subsonic Diffuser-Collector Subsystem Using Interchangeable Geometries
,” M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
11.
Coladipietro
,
R.
,
Schneider
,
J. M.
, and
Sridhar
,
K.
,
1974
, “
Effects of Inlet Flow Conditions on the Performance of Equiangular Annular Diffuser
,”
Trans CSME
,
3
(
2
), pp.
75
82
.
12.
Hoadley
,
D.
, and
Hughes
,
D. W.
,
1969
, “
Swirling Flow in an Annular Diffuser
,”
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
,
Cambridge, UK
, Report No. CUED/A-Turbo/TR5.
13.
Hunt
,
J. C. R.
,
Abell
,
C. J.
,
Peterka
,
J. A.
, and
Woo
,
H.
,
1978
, “
Kinematical Studies of the Flows Around Free or Surface-Mounted Obstacles; Applying Topology to Flow Visualization
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
88
(
1
), pp.
179
200
.
14.
Owczarek
,
J. A.
,
Warnock
,
A. S.
, and
Malik
,
P.
,
1989
, “
A Low Pressure Turbine Exhaust End Flow Model Study
,”
Latest Advances in Steam Turbine Design, Blading, Repairs, Condition, Assessment, and Condenser Interactions
,
D. M.
Rasmussen
, ed.,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
77
88
.
15.
Zhang
,
W.
,
Paik
,
B. G.
,
Jang
,
Y. G.
,
Lee
,
S. J.
,
Lee
,
S. E.
, and
Kim
,
J. H.
,
2007
, “
Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements of the Three-Dimensional Flow in an Exhaust Hood Model of a Low-Pressure Steam Turbine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
129
(
2
), pp.
411
419
.
16.
Yoon
,
S.
,
Stanislaus
,
F. J.
,
Mokulys
,
T.
,
Singh
,
G.
, and
Claridge
,
M.
,
2011
, “
A Three-Dimensional Diffuser Design for the Retrofit of a Low Pressure Turbine Using In-House Exhaust Design System
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-45366.
17.
Shimizu
,
Y.
, and
Sugino
,
K.
,
1980
, “
Hydraulic Losses and Flow Patterns of a Swirling Flow in U-Bends
,”
Bull. JSME
,
23
(
183
), pp.
1443
1450
.
18.
Anwer
,
M.
, and
So
,
R. M. C.
,
1993
, “
Swirling Turbulent Flow Through a Curved Pipe
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
14
(
1–2
), pp.
85
96
.
19.
Kalpakli
,
A.
, and
Örlü
,
R.
,
2013
, “
Turbulent Pipe Flow Downstream a 90 deg Pipe Bend With and Without Superimposed Swirl
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
41
, pp.
103
111
.
You do not currently have access to this content.