Turbine flexible operations with faster startups/shutdowns are required to accommodate emerging renewable power generations. A major challenge in transient thermal design and analysis is the time scale disparity. For natural cooling, the physical process is typically in hours, but on the other hand, the time-step sizes typically usable tend to be very small (subseconds) due to the numerical stability requirement for natural convection as often observed. An issue of interest is: What time-step sizes can and should be used in terms of stability as well as accuracy? In this work, the impact of flow temporal gradient and its modeling is examined in relation to numerical stability and modeling accuracy for transient natural convection. A source term-based dual-timing formulation is adopted, which is shown to be numerically stable for very large time-steps. Furthermore, a loosely coupled procedure is developed to combine this enhanced flow solver with a solid conduction solver for solving unsteady conjugate heat transfer (CHT) problems for transient natural convection. This allows very large computational time-steps to be used without any stability issues, and thus enables to assess the impact of using different time-step sizes entirely in terms of a temporal accuracy requirement. Computational case studies demonstrate that the present method can be run stably with a markedly shortened computational time compared to the baseline solver. The method is also shown to be more accurate than the commonly adopted quasi-steady flow model when unsteady effects are non-negligible.

References

1.
Topel
,
M.
,
Genrup
,
M.
,
Jöcker
,
M.
,
Spelling
,
J.
, and
Laumert
,
B.
,
2015
, “
Operational Improvements for Startup Time Reduction in Solar Steam Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
137
(
4
), p.
042604
.
2.
Born
,
D.
,
Stein
,
P.
,
Marinescu
,
G.
,
Koch
,
S.
, and
Schumacher
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Thermal Modeling of an Intermediate Pressure Steam Turbine by Means of Conjugate Heat Transfer—Simulation and Validation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
139
(
3
), p.
031903
.
3.
Marinescu
,
G.
,
Mohr
,
W. F.
,
Ehrsam
,
A.
,
Ruffino
,
P.
, and
Sell
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Experimental Investigation in to Thermal Behavior of Steam Turbine Components—Temperature Measurements With Optical Probes and Natural Cooling Analysis
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
2
), p.
021602
.
4.
Marinescu
,
G.
,
Stein
,
P.
, and
Sell
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Natural Cooling and Startup of Steam Turbines: Validity of the Over-Conductivity Function
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
137
(
11
), p.
112601
.
5.
Maffulli
,
R.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2014
, “
Wall Temperature Effects on Heat Transfer Coefficient for High Pressure Turbines
,”
AIAA J. Propul. Power
,
30
(
4
), pp.
1080
1090
.
6.
Maffulli
,
R.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2017
, “
Impact of Wall Temperature on Heat Transfer Coefficient and Aerodynamics for 3-D Turbine Blade Passage
,”
ASME J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl.
,
9
(
4
), p.
041002
.
7.
Zhang
,
Q.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2014
, “
Impact of Wall Temperature on Turbine Blade Tip Aerothermal Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
5
), p.
052602
.
8.
He
,
L.
, and
Oldfield
,
M. L. G.
,
2011
, “
Unsteady Conjugate Heat Transfer Modeling
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
3
), p.
031022
.
9.
Sun
,
Z.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Hills
,
N. J.
,
Volkov
,
K. N.
, and
Barnes
,
C. J.
,
2010
, “
Efficient Finite Element Analysis/Computational Fluid Dynamics Thermal Coupling for Engineering Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(
3
), p.
031016
.
10.
Errera
,
M.
, and
Baqué
,
B.
,
2013
, “
A Quasi-Dynamic Procedure for Coupled Thermal Simulations
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
72
(
11
), pp.
1183
1206
.
11.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Corral
,
R.
,
Chaquet
,
J. M.
, and
Pastor
,
G.
,
2013
, “
Analysis and Improvement of a Loosely Coupled Fluid-Solid Heat Transfer Method
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94332.
12.
Altaç
,
Z.
, and
Uğurlubilek
,
N.
,
2016
, “
Assessment of Turbulence Models in Natural Convection From Two- and Three-Dimensional Rectangular Enclosures
,”
Int. J. Therm. Sci.
,
107
, pp.
237
246
.
13.
Ma
,
J.
, and
Xu
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Transient Flows Around a Fin at Different Positions
,”
Procedia Eng.
,
126
, pp.
393
398
.
14.
Xu
,
F.
, and
Saha
,
S. C.
,
2014
, “
Transition to an Unsteady Flow Induced by a Fin on the Sidewall of a Differentially Heated Air-Filled Square Cavity and Heat Transfer
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
71
, pp.
236
244
.
15.
He
,
L.
, and
Fadl
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Multi-Scale Time Integration for Transient Conjugate Heat Transfer
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
83
(
12
), pp.
887
904
.
16.
Perelman
,
T. L.
,
1961
, “
On Conjugated Problems of Heat Transfer
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
3
(
4
), pp.
293
303
.
17.
Jameson
,
A.
,
1991
, “
Time Dependent Calculations Using Multigrid, With Applications to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoil and Wings
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 91-1596.
18.
Arnone
,
A.
,
Liou
,
M. S.
, and
Povinelli
,
L. A.
,
1995
, “
Integration of Navier-Stokes Equations Using Dual Time Stepping and a Multigrid Method
,”
AIAA J.
,
33
(
6
), pp.
985
990
.
19.
He
,
L.
,
2000
, “
3D Navier-Stokes Analysis of Rotor-Stator Interactions in Axial Flow Turbines
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
,
214
(
1
), pp.
13
22
.
20.
Giles
,
M. B.
,
1997
, “
Stability Analysis of Numerical Interface Conditions in Fluid–Structure Thermal Analysis
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
25
(
4
), pp.
421
436
.
You do not currently have access to this content.