Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Research Papers

J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 237–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678232
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 250–257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678238
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 259–269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678241
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 270–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678243
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 277–280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678246
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 281–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678249
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 290–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678250
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 295–298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678253
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 301–304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678257
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 309–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678264
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 319–322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678265
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 324–328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678268
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 329–332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678269

Discussions

J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 245–246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678233
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678234
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 246–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678235
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678236
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 248–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678237
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 257–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678239
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678240
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678242
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678244
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678245
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678247
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678248
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 293–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678251
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678252
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 298–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678254
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678255
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 299–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678256
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 304–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678258
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 305–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678259
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678260
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 306–307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678261
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678262
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 307–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678263
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 322–323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678266
J. Eng. Power. July 1965, 87(3): 323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3678267
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal