A coaxial turbulent spray burner was built to evaluate the relative effectiveness of different chemicals for suppressing fires in a jet engine nacelle. The fire suppressant of current choice, halon 1301 (CF3Br), must be replaced because of its detrimental effect on the ozone layer. The alternatives being considered lack the chemical activity of CF3Br, so that the ability of the agents to mix into the flame convectively and to absorb heat is critical to their success. An agent delivery system was designed to inject the desired amount of material into the air upstream of a fuel nozzle and to control the agent injection rate through variation of the storage pressure and the duration of time that a solenoid valve remains open. The influence of air velocity, fuel flow, and injection period on the amount of nitrogen required to extinguish a jet fuel spray flame is discussed. The effectiveness of eleven different fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, and hydrochlorofluorocarbons is compared to that of halon 1301. The alternatives required 1.7 to 2.3 times the amount (on a mass basis) of CF3Br to extinguish the spray flame, with HCFC-22 being the most efficient and FC-31-10 the least.

1.
Anderson
S. O.
,
1987
, “
Halons and the Stratospheric Ozone Issue
,”
Fire Journal
, Vol.
81
, pp.
56
62
.
2.
Bennett, M., 1992, “Halon Replacement for Aviation Systems,” Proceedings of the 1992 International CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference, The Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy, Fredrick, MD, Sept., p. 667.
3.
Booth, K., Melia, B. J., and Hirst, R., 1973, “Critical Concentration Measurements for Flame Extinguishment Using a Laboratory ‘Cup Burner’ Apparatus,” ICI Mond Division, Wilmington Laboratory, Aug. 31.
4.
Grosshandler, W., Lowe, D., Rinkinen, W., and Presser, C., 1993, “A Turbulent Spray Burner for Assessing Halon Alternative Fire Suppressants,” ASME Paper No. 93-WA/HT-23.
5.
Grosshandler, W. L., Gann, R. G., and Pitts, W. M., eds., 1994, Evaluation of Alternative In-Flight Fire Suppressants for Full-Scale Testing in Simulated Aircraft Engine Nacelles and Dry Bays, NIST SP-861, Apr.
6.
Hamins, A., Gmurczyk, G., Grosshandler, W., Rehwoldt, R., V´zquez, I., Cleary, T., Presser, C., and Seshadri, K., 1994, “Flame Suppression Effectiveness,” in: Evaluation of Alternative In-Flight Fire Suppressants for Full-Scale Testing in Simulated Aircraft Engine Nacelles and Dry Bays, W. L. Grosshandler, R. G. Gann, and W. M. Pitts, eds., NIST SP-861, Apr., Sec. 4.
7.
Harrington
J. L.
,
1993
, “
The Halon Phaseout Speeds Up
,”
NFPA Journal
, Vol.
87
, No.
2
, pp.
38
42
.
8.
Lin˜an
A.
,
1974
, “
The Asymptotic Structure of Counterflow Diffusion Flames for Large Activation Energies
,”
Acta Astronautica
, Vol.
1
, p.
1007
1007
.
9.
Pitts, W. M., Nyden, M. R., Gann, R. G., Mallard, W. G., and Tsang, W., 1990, “Construction of an Exploratory List of Chemicals to Initiate the Search for Halon Alternatives,” NIST Technical Note 1279, Aug.
10.
Sheinson
R. S.
,
Penner-Hahn
J. E.
, and
Indritz
D.
,
1989
, “
The Physical and Chemical Action of Fire Suppressants
,”
Fire Safety Journal
, Vol.
15
, pp.
437
450
.
11.
Tucker
D. M.
,
Drysdale
D. D.
, and
Rasbash
D. J.
,
1981
, “
The Extinction of Diffusion Flames Burning in Various Oxygen Concentrations by Inert Gases and Bromotrifluormethane
,”
Combustion and Flame
, Vol.
41
, p.
293
293
.
12.
Van Wylen, G. J., and Sonntag, R. E., 1978, Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, p. 400.
13.
Williams
F. A.
,
1974
, “
A Unified View of Fire Suppression
,”
Journal of Fire and Flammability
, Vol.
5
, p.
54
54
.
14.
Yang, J., and Breuel, B., 1994, “Thermodynamic Properties of Alternative Agents,” in: Evaluation of Alternative In-Flight Fire Suppressants for Full-Scale Testing in Simulated Aircraft Engine Nacelles and Dry Bays, W. L. Grosshandler, R. G. Gann, and W. M. Pitts, eds., NIST SP-861, Apr., Sec. 2.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.