Transient thermal behavior modeling and simulation is a key issue in predicting flight performance of stratospheric lighter-than-air (LTA) vehicles, such as airships or balloons. To reduce computational load of the transient thermal model without significant loss of accuracy, first this paper adopted an analytical model of view factor from the element surfaces to the Earth and constructed a full distributed parameter transient thermal model. Then, the full model was validated by comparing the predictions obtained from the full model with the flight experimental data. The comparison results show that the divergence of the predicted average internal gas temperatures from the flight data is about 0.4%, and the divergence of the predicted envelop temperatures from the flight data is less than 2.4%. Furthermore, considering that the effect of the net radiation heat transfer among the inner surface enclosure on average internal gas temperature is far less than radiation heat transfer of the outer surfaces, the full model was simplified by omitting radiant heat exchange within the inner surface enclosure. The accuracy of the simplified model was investigated by comparing the predictions of average internal gas temperature and skin temperature distribution between the simplified model and full model under various conditions, such as flight time, altitude, and different external skin thermal properties. The comparison results indicate that the simplified model agrees well with the full model. The discrepancies of the predicted average internal gas temperature between the two models are less than 0.3% under most conditions, and the discrepancies of the predicted temperature distribution between the two models are also acceptable when the LTA vehicle, especially with low absorptivity/emissivity ratio coatings, operates at about 20 km altitude.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research-Article
A Simplified Thermal Model and Comparison Analysis for a Stratospheric Lighter-Than-Air Vehicle
Wei Zheng,
Wei Zheng
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology,
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: zhengwei@qxslab.cn
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: zhengwei@qxslab.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiangyi Zhang,
Xiangyi Zhang
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology,
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: zhangxiangyi@qxslab.cn
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: zhangxiangyi@qxslab.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Rong Ma,
Rong Ma
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology,
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: marong@qxslab.cn
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: marong@qxslab.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Yong Li
Yong Li
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology,
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: liyong@qxslab.cn
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: liyong@qxslab.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Wei Zheng
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology,
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: zhengwei@qxslab.cn
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: zhengwei@qxslab.cn
Xiangyi Zhang
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology,
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: zhangxiangyi@qxslab.cn
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: zhangxiangyi@qxslab.cn
Rong Ma
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology,
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: marong@qxslab.cn
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: marong@qxslab.cn
Yong Li
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology,
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: liyong@qxslab.cn
China Academy of Space Technology,
P. O. Box 5142-221,
Beijing 100094, China
e-mail: liyong@qxslab.cn
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received June 21, 2016; final manuscript received June 19, 2017; published online August 29, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Laurent Pilon.
J. Heat Transfer. Feb 2018, 140(2): 022801 (9 pages)
Published Online: August 29, 2017
Article history
Received:
June 21, 2016
Revised:
June 19, 2017
Citation
Zheng, W., Zhang, X., Ma, R., and Li, Y. (August 29, 2017). "A Simplified Thermal Model and Comparison Analysis for a Stratospheric Lighter-Than-Air Vehicle." ASME. J. Heat Transfer. February 2018; 140(2): 022801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037194
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Thermal Performance Analysis of Geologic High-Level Radioactive Waste Packages
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (December,2011)
A Comparison of Simplified One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Analytical Models for Predicting Metallic Recuperator Performance
J. Heat Transfer (December,2020)
Conjugate Thermal Analysis of Air-Cooled Discrete Flush-Mounted Heat Sources in a Horizontal Channel
J. Electron. Packag (December,2011)
A Modular Ceramic Cavity-Receiver for High-Temperature High-Concentration Solar Applications
J. Sol. Energy Eng (February,2012)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Human Thermal Comfort
Electromagnetic Waves and Heat Transfer: Sensitivites to Governing Variables in Everyday Life
Radiation
Thermal Management of Microelectronic Equipment
Radiation
Thermal Management of Microelectronic Equipment, Second Edition