Nanopolishing processes are used in medical, industrial, telecommunication, optics, and military fields. Hydrodynamic polishing (HDP) is one of the prominent nanopolishing methods in creating nanopolished surfaces on hard and profiled surfaces, where rigid tool-based methods like diamond turning, grinding, and honing have many limitations. This work is focused on modeling of hydrodynamic polishing method. In this method, a film of abrasive suspension is formed between the work-piece surface and a rotating soft tool, which helps in nanopolishing. The past experimental research gives an insight into the process but the process has not been explicitly modeled. Consequently, besides experimental characterization, a numerical/mathematical model of hydrodynamic polishing process is important. This paper presents a model of the HDP process which takes into account the polishing process variables, such as, contact load, spindle speed, tool and work-piece material properties/geometry, and abrasive suspension properties. The response of the model is the pressure distribution and the abrasive film thickness in the polishing zone. To model the elastohydrodynamic process encountered in HDP, the pressure and the film thickness profiles of lubricated isothermal point contacts have been evaluated using the multilevel multi-integration (MLMI) scheme coded in C programming language. Finally, load, tool stiffness, speed, and particle concentration in the suspension have been implicitly correlated to the surface roughness (SR) to evolve a semi-empirical model for surface roughness as a function of mean film thickness and mean pressure. Empirical models for mean film thickness and mean pressure have also been developed as a function of process variables. These models have been developed from a Taguchi L27 orthogonal array wherein the mean pressure/film thickness values have been determined from the model and the average surface roughness values have been measured experimentally. It has been observed that the load does not affect the surface roughness significantly and mean pressure does not change with the change in abrasive size and spindle speed. Abrasive particle concentration has been found to be the most important parameter and it affects the surface roughness significantly.

References

1.
Komanduri
,
R.
,
Lucca
,
D. A.
, and
Tani
,
Y.
,
1997
, “
Technological Advances in Fine Abrasive Processes
,”
Ann. CIRP
,
46
(
2
),
pp.
545
596
.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60880-4
2.
Girma
,
B.
,
Joshi
,
S. S.
, and
Raghuram
,
M. V. G. S.
,
2006
, “
An Experimental Analysis of Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Plane Surfaces
,”
Mach. Sci. Technol.
,
10
(
3
),
pp.
323
340
.10.1080/10910340600902140
3.
Jain
,
V. K.
, and
Adsul
,
S. G.
,
2000
, “
Experimental Investigations Into Abrasive Flow Machining (AFM)
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
40
,
pp.
1003
1021
.10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00114-5
4.
Mori
,
Y.
,
Yamauchi
,
K.
, and
Endo
,
K.
,
1987
Elastic Emission Machining
,”
Precis. Eng.
,
9
,
pp.
123
128
.10.1016/0141-6359(87)90029-8
5.
Su
,
Y. T.
,
Horng
,
C. C.
,
Wang
,
S. Y.
, and
Jang
,
S. H.
,
1996
, “
Ultra-Precision Machining by the Hydrodynamic Polishing Process
,”
Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manuf.
,
36
,
pp.
275
291
.10.1016/0890-6955(95)98766-Z
6.
Yamauchi
,
K.
,
Mimura
,
H.
,
Inagaki
,
K.
, and
Mori
,
Y.
,
2002
, “
Figuring With Subnanometer-Level Accuracy by Numerically Controlled Elastic Emission Machining
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
,
73
(
11
),
pp.
4028
4033
.10.1063/1.1510573
7.
Joshi
,
M.
,
Singh
,
R. K.
,
Joshi
,
S. S.
,
Balasubramaniam
,
R.
, and
Suri
,
V. K.
,
2009
, “
Preliminary Investigations of Hydrodynamic Polishing of Flat Steel Plates
,”
4M/ICOMM Conference
,
Karlsruhe, Germany
.
8.
Su
,
Y.-T.
,
Wang
,
S.-Y.
, and
Hsiau
,
J.-S.
,
1995
, “
On Machining Rate of Hydrodynamic Polishing Process
,”
Wear
,
188
,
pp.
77
87
.10.1016/0043-1648(95)06614-4
9.
Barus
,
C.
,
1893
, “
Isotherms, Isopiestics and Isometrics Relative to Viscosity
,”
Am. J. Sci.
,
45
,
pp.
87
96
.
10.
So
,
B. Y. C.
, and
Klaus
,
E. E.
,
1980
, “
Viscosity-Pressure Correlation of Liquids
,”
ASLE Trans.
,
23
,
pp.
409
421
.10.1080/05698198008982986
11.
Dowson
,
D.
, and
Higginson
,
G. R.
,
1966
,
Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication, The Fundamentals of Roller and Gear Lubrication
,
Pergamon Press
,
Oxford, Great Britain
.
12.
Dowson
,
D.
,
1995
, “
Elastohydrodynamic and Microelastohydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
Wear
,
190
,
pp.
125
138
.10.1016/0043-1648(95)06660-8
13.
Gohar
,
R.
,
1985
,
Elastohydrodynamics
(
Ellis Horwood Series in Mechanical Engineering
),
Imperial College Press
,
New York
.
14.
Hertz
,
H.
,
1881
, “
On the Contact of Elastic Solids
,”
J. Reine Angew. Math.
,
92
,
pp.
156
171
.
15.
Moes
,
H.
,
1965
, “
Discussion on a Paper by D. Dowson
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
180
,
pp.
244
245
.
16.
Venner
,
C. H.
, and
Lubrecht
,
A. A.
,
2000
,
Multilevel Methods in Lubrication
,
Elsevier
,
New York
.
17.
Goodyer
,
C. E.
,
2001
, “
Adaptive Numerical Methods for Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
University of Leeds
,
Leeds, England
.
18.
de
Sande
,
B. V.
,
2007
, “
Assessment of Fuji Pre-Scale Films in Tyre/Road Contact Surface Measurements
,”
DCT Bachelor Final Project
,
Eindhoven University
,
Eindhoven
.
19.
Phadke
,
M. S.
,
1989
,
Quality Engineering Using Robust Design
,
Prentice-Hall Publication
,
New Jersey
.
20.
Zhang
,
Z.
,
Liu
,
W.
, and
Song
,
Z.
,
2010
, “
Effect of Abrasive Particle Concentration on Preliminary Chemical Mechanical Polishing of Glass Substrate
,”
Microelectron. Eng.
,
87
(
11
),
pp.
2168
2172
.10.1016/j.mee.2010.01.020
21.
Jacobson
,
B. O.
,
1991
,
Rheology and Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
,
Elsevier Science Ltd.
,
Amsterdam
.
You do not currently have access to this content.