A broadly applicable formulation for investigating design propagations in mechanisms is developed and illustrated. Analytical criteria in terms of the variations of joint position vectors and orientation matrices for planar and spatial mechanisms are presented. Mechanisms are represented using graph theory and closed loops are converted to a tree-like structure by cutting joints and introducing new constraints. The Jacobian matrix in Cartesian space is then transformed to Joint coordinates space. Two cases are considered: a pair of bodies remain connected by one joint after cutting additional joints and a pair of bodies are disconnected after cutting joints. Using this method, a designer has the ability to study the propagated effect of changing a design variable on the design. The presented formulation is validated through a numerical example of a McPherson strut suspension system. The system is analyzed and an assembled configuration is computed after a change in design.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Design, Kinematic analysis, Cutting, Jacobian matrices, Struts (Engineering), Suspension systems
1.
Alder
R. E.
, and
Ishii
K.
,
1989
, “
DAISIE: Designer’s Aid for Simultaneous Engineering
,”
Computers in Engineering Conf. and Expo.
Vol.
1
, pp.
19
–
26
.
2.
Bae, D. S., and Haug, E. J., 1987, “A Recursive Formulation for Constrained Mechanical System Dynamics, Part I-Open Loop Systems, and Part II-Closed Loop Systems,” Mechanics of Structures and Machines, Vol. 15, No. 3 and No. 4.
3.
Bae, D. S., Hwang, R. S., and Haug, E. J., 1988, “Recursive Formulation for Real-Time Dynamic Simulation,” Technical Report D-2, Center for Simulation and Design Optimization, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
4.
Bowen
J.
, and
Bahler
D.
,
1992
, “
Frames, Quantification, Perspectives, and Negotiation in Constraint Networks for Life-Cycle Engineering
,”
Artificial Intelligence in Engineering
, Vol.
7
, pp.
199
–
226
.
5.
Burke, E. K., Elliman, D. G., and Heard, M. I., 1994, “XCODAMS: An Engineering Design System Based on Constraint Propagation,” Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, pp. 601–608.
6.
Cutkosky, M. R., and Tenenbaum, J. M., 1990, “Toward a Computational Framework for Concurrent Engineering,” Electronics Society-IECON, Pacific Grove, CA, pp. 700–706.
7.
DADS User’s Manual, Computer Aided Design Software Inc. (CADSI), P.O. Box 203, Oakdale, Iowa, 52319.
8.
Fisher, D. C., and Nguyen, T. D., 1989, “Design and Analysis Aid for Evaluating Aircraft Structures,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems IEA/AIE, Charleston, pp. 469–472.
9.
Fohn
S. M.
,
Greef
A. R.
,
Young
R. E.
, and
O’Grady
P. J.
,
1994
, “
Constraint System Shell to Support Engineering Approaches to Concurrent Engineering
,”
Artificial Intelligence in Engineering
, Vol.
9
, No.
1
, pp.
1
–
17
.
10.
Gopalakrishnan, B., and Pandiarajan, V., 1990, “Product Design for Manufacturing: The Use of Knowledge Based Systems in Concurrent Engineering,” IEEE Int Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 566–568.
11.
Haug, E. J., 1989, Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems, Vol. I, Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Hwang, R. S., and Haug, E. J., 1988, “A Recursive Multibody Dynamics Formulation for Parallel Computation,” Technical Report R-13, Center for Simulation and Design Optimization, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
13.
Hwang, R. S., Bae, D. S., Kuhl, J. G., and Haug, E. J., 1988, “Parallel Processing for Real-Time Dynamic System Simulation,” ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS, TRANSMISSIONS, AND AUTOMATION IN DESIGN.
14.
Imamura
S.
,
1994
, “
Development of Constraint Based Object Oriented Language for engineering design-on the parametric design support
,”
Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering
Vol.
60
, No.
9
, pp.
1242
–
1246
.
15.
Kolb, M. A., and Bailey, M. W., 1993, “FRODO: Constraint-Based Object Modeling for Preliminary Design,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual ASME Design Automation Conference, Albuquerque, NM, Vol. 65, pp. 307–318.
16.
Serrano, D., and Gossard, D., 1988, “Constraint Management,” MCAE’ Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, J. S. Gero, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 217–239.
17.
Silverstein, E., Kaminski, J. S., Farenci, R., and Kumaran, A., 1990, “A Knowledge Acquisition Tool for Design Engineering Applications,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems IEA/AIE, Charleston, pp. 1167–1172.
18.
Tak, T., and Kim, S. S., 1990, “Design Sensitivity Analysis of Multibody Dynamic Systems,” Technical Report R-88, Center for Simulation and Design Optimization, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
19.
Tsai, F. F., 1989, “Automatic Method for High Speed Simulation of Multibody Dynamic Systems,” PhD Dissertation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
20.
Wittenburg, J., 1977, Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1977.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.